Cool read!

http://www.redskins.com/news/newsDetail.jsp?id=11529

Sometimes we forget how far the Skins have come

They have even questioned his sanity, these guys know no shame. they think they are better than anyone. it really sickens me their pride and arrogance.they judge everyone and everything, but don't you dare question them.

Great article. I love the stuff about Gibbs and the "bonding" of the team.

They have even questioned his sanity, these guys know no shame. they think they are better than anyone. it really sickens me their pride and arrogance.they judge everyone and everything, but don't you dare question them.

At the risk of getting an answer I won't like ... who are you talking about?

At the risk of getting an answer I won't like ... who are you talking about?
Yeah, I am lost here too. You got some splaining to do!

I thought it was a good read myself. The previous article I took a little bit of issue with, this one had some good points and gave some good reasons to believe.

I like the turnover breakdown - I hadn't seen those numbers before!

This was a decent article. I personally have no problem with any article I've read (I believe) from him. Its the Art guy that always puts a divide up and makes an attempt to alienate and intimidate someone who doesn't have the same opinion.

The writer pointed out the same thing my brother said the other day while watching the game against K.C. -- when Washington fumbles the ball, it bounces all over the field. But when Washington's opponents fumble, it conveniently bounces right back to them.

It's about time that ball bounces the other way.

This was a decent article. I personally have no problem with any article I've read (I believe) from him. Its the Art guy that always puts a divide up and makes an attempt to alienate and intimidate someone who doesn't have the same opinion.

I take a slightly different tact towards these columns than Om does, in that I attempt to judge the issue most discussed among the fans and form an opinion based on that to put forth in a column. Given the highly divided nature of recent discussions it is likely either side one lands on that would have a problem with writing that takes the other.

Such is the nature of having an opinion. Indeed, I was very hard on those on one side of the most recent LaVar debate due to the inane, ludicrous, fictional nature of the position most put forth. But, that was merely the content because it was all there was.

The article on the Ramsey/Brunell situation was similar where I felt shame in fellow fans for their ignorant, baseless revolt on Gibbs happening throughout the Brunell/Ramsey debate. Likely, if one's inclined to feel that way on an issue, it's not likely the column associated with it will be designed to bring folks together, but, rather, to jolt the sensibilities of those unwilling to let simple facts enter the equation.

I can say that for those on the LaVar side, given the content outlined attributed to them, and for those on the Ramsey side earlier, if they were bothered, intimidated or insulted, good. That's just how those of us on the other side felt about them :).