Did anyone else watch Comcast postgame? (Lavar Related)

Pages : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 [17] 18 19

railcon56
10-12-2005, 03:08 PM
I totally think #56 is LaVar.
NO he's not LaVar and i for 1 am in total 2000% agreement with #56 this thing is sick and it stinks...watch and see how this comes out and watch where he goes and then watch him totally terrorizes the skins ...its personal and Gibbs and that lying dog williams are lying ..You can slowly see the Defense fall apart week by week werent we #2 well we're #5 now wanna bet #7 next week anytakers???

I wont be as nice this sux ..Williams is making a point that he can do it without Lavar his liitle ego is hurt ..Like he's bigger than Lavar ..in the mean time u have scrubs that cant even carry the wrapper Lavar's jock came in starting ahead of him what a joke...
Lavar cant play in a system well watch that system its crumbling slowly ..a run here a loss here...

#56fanatic
10-12-2005, 03:26 PM
Can you get it through your hard damn head that maybe JUST F*&^ING MAYBE Lavar is full of sh*t and actaully does get a reasonable amount of snaps? You take his saying that he doesn't as gospel. Open your eyes man! Can't you see you're being snowed by your emotions on this one. I love Lavar as a player too but I'd be willing to bet he wouldn't feel he was getting enough reps unless he was getting EVERY REP. His definition of enough reps and the coaches is probably vastly different. If you want to argue he isn't getting enough reps don't do it solely based on what Lavar says. We really have no reason to believe anything he says since as Matty pointed out "Lavar is always the victim".

First, dont talk to me like that. This is a chat where people voice their opinion, thats mine. If you dont like it, or dont agree with it, fine. Thats your opinion and you are entitled to one. Just because I feel the organization is crapping on LaVar doesn't mean you feel the same way. There are alot of people in this that side with both of us. If thats the way you are going to respond to my remarks, then dont respond. I really dont feel it necessary. I dont believe I have said anything harsh or profain lased to you, in fact I know I havn't. So, apology accepted. lets move on.

FRPLG
10-12-2005, 03:52 PM
No apology offered. I think your views on the situation are misguided and uninformed. I think they take into consideration only what suits your argument with prejudice for what does not. I think your far too emotionally attached to one player rather than being attached to the team. You are being hard headed without good reason or fact and when it comes down to it your arguments are not just weak but unfathomably asanine.

As far as how I respond to you I will respond how I please. If I think your are right I will say so and if I think you are right I will say so.

If I think your a retarded moron I would say that and if I thought you were a brilliant genius I would say that. I think based on your comments that your are none of these. Rather I see you as someone who is so emotionally attached to one guy that it clouds your judgement of the situation.

Notice how I haven't really reposnded to others on this too much. My last several posts have been about your thoughts but have strangely been ignored by you as I posed some questions you seem unwilling to answer. That leads me to believe you really have no argument much beyond "Well, just because!".

#56fanatic
10-12-2005, 04:02 PM
No apology offered. I think your views on the situation are misguided and uninformed. I think they take into consideration only what suits your argument with prejudice for what does not. I think your far too emotionally attached to one player rather than being attached to the team. You are being hard headed without good reason or fact and when it comes down to it your arguments are not just weak but unfathomably asanine.

As far as how I respond to you I will respond how I please. If I think your are right I will say so and if I think you are right I will say so.

If I think your a retarded moron I would say that and if I thought you were a brilliant genius I would say that. I think based on your comments that your are none of these. Rather I see you as someone who is so emotionally attached to one guy that it clouds your judgement of the situation.

Notice how I haven't really reposnded to others on this too much. My last several posts have been about your thoughts but have strangely been ignored by you as I posed some questions you seem unwilling to answer. That leads me to believe you really have no argument much beyond "Well, just because!".



I haven't seen any of your questions. Ask away, I always enjoy aswering them. I dont know that any of my answers are misguided on misinformed as I get them from the horses mouth, but thats ok too. Yes I am a HUGE fan of LaVar, I do think he is a better player than Holdman and Clemons, but I am all so grateful that we are finally winning. I think our defense is playing good football, I also THINK(key word) that we would be as good, possible better with him on the field. Its not anyones fault that some of us think there is a deeper meaning to LaVar not playing, rather than not learning the system. And I do hope that comes to not be the case. Maybe GW is right, who knows, no one knows whats going on at Redskins park, at least none of us on this chat. Dont be so angry with someone expressing the way they feel or the opinions they have. Just because you dont agree, or maybe my opinions are wrong, who cares they are opinions. I have never attacked you or your statements, and as a Redskin fan first and foremost I am extremely happy we are winning. LaVar is the 2nd story, it just so happens to be a VERY BIG story. feel free to ask your questions if you have any, if you want to start bashing, I might join in, might not, just depends on how I feel.

TheMalcolmConnection
10-12-2005, 04:13 PM
Guys, I think that both of you are taking it a bit personally. We're WINNING fellas, whether an opinion is misguided or uninformed, that's no reason to get upset over this.

You'd think an opposing team's fan had come to the board.

Chiiiill. :)

#56fanatic
10-12-2005, 04:15 PM
Because on a team that doesn't win much, that's where they make the money. Looking at your age you should know this, old man. ;)

I just saw this, good one. I am not that old!! you are right, they havn't won much in the past 10 years, except for the 1 trip to playoffs. But they use certain players as cash cows then toss them aside when their done. I guess thats the way its going to be, gotta get use to it.

#56fanatic
10-12-2005, 04:16 PM
I totally think #56 is LaVar.

AHHHH, you wish! Guess I have to change my screen name!

TheMalcolmConnection
10-12-2005, 04:16 PM
If you want someone to laugh at who has been passed around, I always look at Eddie Kennison and his tattoos of all the teams he's played with...

...he's like the town whore.

#56fanatic
10-12-2005, 04:19 PM
When did they lie? In your wildest imaginations you can't find anythign they have said that is a lie. You're taking Lavar's word as gold and dismissing they're word. Why? And honestly if you look at what both have said you don't see to much contradiction. No where did Gibbs or Williams say that Lavar was getting every rep possible. All they said was he needed to show improvement in practice. Lots of guys move up the depth chart by only a getting a few reps in practice and doing the max they can with them. The coaches don't stop watching when the 3rd and 4th stringers are getting reps. They're watching to see who is doing what.

Who knows who is lying and who isn't. LaVar says hes practicing as much as hes playing, which is not at all. His jersey looked pretty clean after the game sunday. If you dont practice, you can't prove anything.

cpayne5
10-12-2005, 04:26 PM
http://www.skinsfan.us/Redskins/eaters.mp3

EZ Archive Ads Plugin for vBulletin Copyright 2006 Computer Help Forum