Could the Redskins be interested in Vince Wilfork?

Pages : 1 [2]

offiss
04-17-2004, 02:35 AM
Vince is a huge presence to say the least. The guy is massive and can move. Id only take him if Taylor is gone though. Ive seen interviews with Wilfork where he even says Taylor is the best player on the team. Some of you might not think that means much, but Miami players always think they are the best, they might say someone is good but to flat out say another player is best is a rare thing.

Id liek to see us get Taylor at five, and trade somethign, mabye next years first, to get Wilfork later in the draft. Him and C.Griffen are both monsters at stuffing the run, wed probably need some depth though to rotate them in and out to keep them fresh.

Im with you on that, if we come out of this draft with just taylor and wilfork it was a major success.

SKINSnCANES
04-17-2004, 02:46 AM
Yea it would, that would be a hell of a draft to get Taylor and a stud DT. You cant trust all the rumors but I wouldnt mind us getting those two. Man, our defense would be great if that could happen.

skinsfanthru&thru
04-17-2004, 03:13 AM
we aren"t gonna be trading next years early round picks unless its a second or third packaged with a couple players and even then we arent getting back into the first round

SKINSnCANES
04-17-2004, 04:10 AM
why do you say that. Baltimore traded a one and a two last year to get into the first round. What makes this year any different. They seemed to have set the bar for getting an extra first round pick. Dont you think?

skinsfanthru&thru
04-17-2004, 02:31 PM
i'm just not too keen on selling the future for today when no matter what, we r gonna have holes this year. how do we know the draft won't be better next year with a couple players who'd be perfect for us. only a couple of the deals we've made trading future picks has worked out for us and I honestly don't see us having enough fire power to move up high enough to get someone like wilfork or udeze. that is unless of course we risk too much for one player almost like ditka w/williams. too much to risk losing for one player IMO.

SKINSnCANES
04-17-2004, 03:53 PM
I agree we sholdnt be giving up to many players. Its just so tempting to get all our needs filled this year. But then next year we'd have nothing to talk about, having no picks. Our flexability this year is hurt by not having many picks.

offiss
04-18-2004, 05:40 AM
I agree we sholdnt be giving up to many players. Its just so tempting to get all our needs filled this year. But then next year we'd have nothing to talk about, having no picks. Our flexability this year is hurt by not having many picks.

Well I say let's enjoy a bountiful draft this year we can fulfill our need's in this draft, who know's if the right player's will be available next year? Besides the future is now! we wont need a draft next year if we play this one right. And don't worry so long as DS own's the team we will alway's have something to talk about.

SKINSnCANES
04-18-2004, 03:14 PM
Its always nice to get ore needs filled this year, but we're still going to have needs next year to. How many people didnt think Bailey was going to be a Skin for life this time last year? How many people thought we'd need oline help this year after picking up randy thomas and dave fiorra? I do want us to get the most out of this years draft that we can so that we can make a push for the title this year, but I dont know if it would be the smartest of moves.

EZ Archive Ads Plugin for vBulletin Copyright 2006 Computer Help Forum