All Arrington All The Time (Mega Merge Club Mix)

Pages : 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20

offiss
10-03-2005, 05:51 PM
I can't argue with that other than to say that maybe he just can't be the same player he was before with the banged up knee. I have to imagine if he could rush the passer like has done in the past for us he'd be on the field. I think this is a health issue and if not a health issue it is an issue where the knee is healed but damaged so much it has reduced his effectiveness.


The thing is we are not hearing that from either side, and it's not like Lavar has had reconstructive knee surgery, he say's he's 100%, the team hasen't said otherwise, in fact what they have said is Lavar has to learn what we [Williams] want's from him, apparently he's having a major problem figuring that out.

Sociofan
10-03-2005, 05:54 PM
I don't know. Lavar said that he and the coaches aren't even really talking with one another about this. The Redskins organization made a substantial financial commitment to him which tells me that they see him as an integral part of their team. How can coaches just refuse to communicate with an integral part of the team? I guess we as fans can only speculate, but this just does not smell right.

offiss
10-03-2005, 05:54 PM
I would agree it does not make sense to pay a player that much money just to ride the bench. Its like the same argument that Gibbs put in Brunell because he picked him and gave him such a large contract. I think they maybe saving Lavar for the right game because he is not playing teams will not game plan for him.


Come FD, I think your really stretching on this one, kind of like the argument that Gibbs is keeping teams in games because he doesn't want to reveal our double secret offensive scheme because he's saving it for the super bowl.

offiss
10-03-2005, 05:56 PM
I don't know. Lavar said that he and the coaches aren't even really talking with one another about this. The Redskins organization made a substantial financial commitment to him which tells me that they see him as an integral part of their team. How can coaches just refuse to communicate with an integral part of the team? I guess we as fans can only speculate, but this just does not smell right.


I wonder if Lavar has found a plasma tv at his doorstep yet? :laughing2

Sociofan
10-03-2005, 05:59 PM
:laughing- Awww man. That's just not funny, so I shouldn't be laughing.

sportscurmudgeon
10-03-2005, 06:02 PM
12th Man/FRPLG:

I don't know why Arrington is not on the field; only Gibbs and Willliams know that.

Last year, the Redskins defense was really, really good, LaVar Arrington contributed next to nothing to their being really, really good. So, the coaching staff has some reason to suspect that they can have a really, really good defense on the field with LaVar Arrington on the sidelines or in the owners' box or at Redskins' Park or in Lower Slobbovia. They already did that last year.

Now it is 2005. Warrick Holdman played well in the exhibition games and LaVar Arrington's knee required him to ease on through some of the workouts. So, it's time to name a starting unit and Gibbs and Williams sit down to make up the first string. Remember, Gibbs wears the hat of Coach Gibbs and also the hat of President of Football Operations Gibbs.

IF Williams tells Gibbs that Williams believes that the defense will be just fine with Holdman at starting LB, let's IMAGINE what Joe Gibbs does. Remember, this is IMAGINATION because we cannot read minds. And remember, the premise here is that Williams believes that the defense is perfectly OK with Holdman in the starting line-up and Arrington playing only a little bit.

Gibbs has two choices; he can tell Williams that he wants Arrington on the field or he can go along with Williams.

Choice #1 - Overrule Willliams and put LaVar on the starting unit:

Pro: You get a physically gifted football player out there on the field.
You "get your money's worth" from your highest plaid player.

Con: You will have a less than fully happy Defensive Coordinator if you overrule him.
You will have to pay Arrington even more money if he achieves the incentive levels in his contract.
You may put Arrington a year closer to leaving the team as a free agent if he plays and plays really well.


Choice #2 - Go along with the recommendation of Defensive Coordinator

Pro: Happier coaching staff
You have one hell of a guy on the bench to provide a "shot in the arm" for the defense if they ever falter.
You can sit back and see how the season unfolds. If the defense is strong, you just let things keep on keeping on; if they hit a rough spot, you can be the guy who "makes the tough call" and insert Arrington into the lineup.

Con: You have to listen to media gurus like Doc Walker and Al Koken wonder why all this is happening.


So, if you were Joe Gibbs and you got that recommendation from Gregg Williams, what would you have done?

Sociofan
10-03-2005, 06:07 PM
Curmudgeon, I don't think this is about Gibbs versus Williams. I think it's more about what has happened that Williams has lost faith in Lavar. If you have a 3 time Pro Bowler in his prime sitting on the bench, aren't you at least intrigued by what might happen when you put him on the field healthy?

I think we are all just curious about WHY Lavar is not getting the snaps we all think he's earned.

Kevikazi
10-03-2005, 06:15 PM
I remember seeing Gregg Williams pulling LaVar out of Dallas game after just 2 plays. Williams made some kind of "cut-throat" gesture to say "You are done playing." I just get the feeling that LaVar is unable to play within Williams' scheme.

Daseal
10-03-2005, 06:27 PM
Me too, Kev. I simply think Arrington wants to be the star and that doesn't include buying into the scheme and playing his part no matter how large or small. I think he wants sacks from an upright position and bonecrushing hits on RBs. Problem is, he can be caught out of position (over-runs the play) and burned. So I can understand why he's off.

The problem is -- he's not going anywhere. Personally, I would have traded him before giving him that ridiculously huge contract because I feel his contributions aren't worth a portion of our cap that large.

memphisskin
10-03-2005, 06:34 PM
I think Lavar just wants to help us win, when I read his comments I heard a guy frustrated that he hasn't been able to do more to help the team win but a guy ready and willing to do just that.

As for the rumor about his unwillingness to play special teams, I know at least one punter who would argue with that. Once LA hits the field, the opponents will pay. I don't know what it is, my only hope is to see Lavar back on the field knocking qbs into retirement. that's it.

EZ Archive Ads Plugin for vBulletin Copyright 2006 Computer Help Forum