All Arrington All The Time (Mega Merge Club Mix)

I really don't think this has anything to do with Snyder at all.I agree with you but if it did I would be very dispointed in our coaching staff.

I agree with you but if it did I would be very dispointed in our coaching staff.

If anything, I believe Danny wants LaVar on the field. You have to remember, Danny was a diehard Redskin fan before he struck it rich and bought them. If this was anyother coaching staff, he would have already demanded LaVar be on the field. In a way, I wish he would step in and say to play him.

It's too easy to use the same 'Dan Snyder ruined the Redskins' excuse. If we have gained anything with the re-hire of Coach Gibbs it's that Dan has taken a back seat to Gibbs.

I'd guess at a Lavar Vs. Williams ego clash. Lavar has a problem playing outside of his instictive style, Williams needs him to to perform within the framework.

When the circumstances dictate (i.e. we're looking to take a QB out of his rhythm, Mr. Plummer) Lavar will be let loose, lord help the poor bugger on the end of THAT storm.

Snyder and Arrington are supposedly very tight, I'm not sure how the whole contract dispute thing may have hurt their relationship, but LaVar was a pallbearer at Snyder's father's funeral if that tells you anything.

Are you saying Danny does not want Lavar on the field and the coaches are going along and you think the same was true with brunell and Ramsey?


I don't think the same about brunnel or Ramsey at all. That was a coaching issue.
Lavar on the other hand has blasted the team in the past in the media.
Had a dirty dispute with the team over 6.5 million dollars.
Lavar has a hefty contract and the less time he has on the field the more money the team saves.

Because of that preseason game were Willams was able to use Arrington well, I think those whole thing about him not being able to "fit" into schemes is just smoke and mirrors.

>>Snyder will make his life hell as a Redskin. Maybe what Coles said was true, cause it seems to me that he is carrying it out on Lavar.>>

>>So what are the facts??? IMHO, I believe the skins realized that they don't need $11+M tied to one player, when that player is replaceable by a system. Secondly, I think what makes arrington so attractive to alot of teams is also the reason why he is not attractive to Williams/Lindsay.>>

Firstly (to the first quote) do we want this kind of Owner? I know, I know... it is a rhetorical question. We are Stuck with him.
Secondly - Shouldn't we be thinking about the future? Won't it be about time for Williams to get another chance to be a head coach after this season? What if our next Def. Coordinator prizes LA's Style of play. OBC spermier got rid of Steve Davis and boy, Joe Gibbs sure would have liked to have had SD last year.

What position do you think we we fill in:

1. another Stout DT
2. Pass rushing end
3. Big offensive line
4. another speedy wide receiver
5. another TE
6. A high draft pick

A stud passrusher!! Which if nothing else, use Lavar.. Remember when Marvin Lewis used him as a DE, he registered 11 sacks. and that was as a part time DE.

Snyder and Arrington are supposedly very tight, I'm not sure how the whole contract dispute thing may have hurt their relationship, but LaVar was a pallbearer at Snyder's father's funeral if that tells you anything.

Exactly!!! That's why it cannot be a Danny thing. Additionally, It will take a lot more than I have read thus far to convince me that our coaching staff would be involved in some kind of nefarious plot, and conspire to keep Lavar off the field for illegitimate reasons. There is NO payoff for the Redskins?

I don't really care at this point. I just know two things:

1. I want LaVar and his huge asssss contract to stay here in D.C. I think it will go a long way in terms breeding a culture of tenured Redskins for life, if there is such a thing. (ref. to an earlier post)

2. I want him to rip Plummer's ass on Sunday!!!

>>Snyder will make his life hell as a Redskin. Maybe what Coles said was true, cause it seems to me that he is carrying it out on Lavar.>>

>>So what are the facts??? IMHO, I believe the skins realized that they don't need $11+M tied to one player, when that player is replaceable by a system. Secondly, I think what makes arrington so attractive to alot of teams is also the reason why he is not attractive to Williams/Lindsay.>>

Firstly (to the first quote) do we want this kind of Owner? I know, I know... it is a rhetorical question. We are Stuck with him.
Secondly - Shouldn't we be thinking about the future? Won't it be about time for Williams to get another chance to be a head coach after this season? What if our next Def. Coordinator prizes LA's Style of play. OBC spermier got rid of Steve Davis and boy, Joe Gibbs sure would have liked to have had SD last year.

I doubt Williams is going anywhere next year. He's well paid here - and could very well be Gibbs' heir appearant. Plus he loves himself some Sean Taylor:)