wheeler
10-03-2005, 02:26 AM
Brunell/Moss BRUNELL/MOSS has a good ring to it ..........and RAMSEY BACKIN HIM UP depth............
Brunellwheeler 10-03-2005, 02:26 AM Brunell/Moss BRUNELL/MOSS has a good ring to it ..........and RAMSEY BACKIN HIM UP depth............ Longtimefan 10-03-2005, 02:46 AM I agree with your analysis 100% Skinsguy and wish more of us could feel that way. It wasn't a perfect game, but none are, and I'm very pleased to be able to relish in the win. Maybe last year we would have lost today's game, so I do see progress, and that's all anyone can ask for. On the Brunell Int. I thought it may have been wise for Portis to just make an attempt to knock the ball away since he didn't have much of a chance to catch it. It's possible that he wasn't thinking to do that, but when you tip the ball (espically up into the air) it's likely it just might fall into the hands of a defender. It seems now that even when we win games we somehow find little things to nit-pick about. It was a great win despite being a little nerve racking at the end. illdefined 10-03-2005, 02:59 AM On the Brunell Int. I thought it may have been wise for Portis to just make an attempt to knock the ball away since he didn't have much of a chance to catch it. It's possible that he wasn't thinking to do that, but when you tip the ball (espically up into the air) it's likely it just might fall into the hands of a defender. no one can blame Portis or Brunell for that INT, that's just ridiculous. we had more chance to make that catch then miss it. offiss 10-03-2005, 04:18 AM No matter how good anyone say's Brunell played the Hawk's were in a position to beat us at home on the final play, personally I don't lay our offensive woe's on Brunell as much as Gibbs, it's Gibbs job to get it into Brunells head to hit recievers out of their cut's and so on. IMO we are more talented than the Seahawks, and as talented as any team in the league, it is unacceptable to be in a position to lose at home on the final play to seattle, I don't care what their record was coming in, I have never been impressed with Ray Rhodes on defense, and Holgrum is nothing special, we wont get away with this kind of play against better teams, who IMO we haven't faced yet. Chicago- no QB Dallas- no nothing Seattle- poorly coached IMO going into Denver will be our first real test. TheMalcolmConnection 10-03-2005, 07:09 AM I was at the game and as was mentioned earlier. He looks like a completely different QB. He made great reads and got the ball to the open guy. Also, is it just me or does the playcalling seem much improved? Gibbs was running a trick play or two, AND the routes were run deeper this week, rather than those 5-6 yard routes we're used to. 12thMan 10-03-2005, 08:37 AM we wont get away with this kind of play against better teams, who IMO we haven't faced yet. Chicago- no QB Dallas- no nothing Seattle- poorly coached IMO going into Denver will be our first real test. I hear you offiss, but here's the thing every week there has been a so-called first real test for our Skins team. Go back and read the threads prior to each game, and pretty much the consensus was that we're facing a much tougher opponent this week, then next week.....and so on. Every week we have "gotten away" with what some say would call mediocre play and came away with a win. If we happen to split on our next two week road trip, it shouldn't take anything away from our past three victories. Seems like we are a waiting for a loss to confirm our doubts about our team. (not you necessarily) IMO, whether we lose to Denver or beat the hell out of them, I still believe, as do you, that we can play with any team in the NFL. I don't think Jake Plummer is more effecient than Hasselback, and Denver certainly doesn't have the same running attack as Seattle does. Then on the other hand, Denver's D isn't as good as Chicago's, IMO. See where I'm going? We've already passed different tests along the way on some level this year, we'll just find out a little more about our team next week. TheMalcolmConnection 10-03-2005, 08:50 AM Well put, 12th man. Hog1 10-03-2005, 09:09 AM Let's also remember that Brunell didn't get much work in the offseason with the starters, so he's still working on getting his timing down with those guys. Best post in this thread. The focus on a mis-thrown pass, which did not effect the outcome of the game, in what otherwise was an incredible outing, is ridiculous. The numbers for the QB are formidable. The best part is this offense is still a toddler. It is growing up FAST!!!!!!!!!! And we stil have a few more weeks til' we play another division rival. at the moment THEISMAN IS A GENIUS MTK 10-03-2005, 09:57 AM i thought everyone has a right to an opinion here. it's when you're told to stop expressing yours by admins and moderators that i begin to ask if there's 'rules'. Who told you to stop expressing your opinion?? illdefined 10-03-2005, 10:00 AM Why can't we just talk about the solid performance that our starting QB had today without the conversation reverting to the tired 'what would Ramsey do' debate?? and the like. |
|
EZ Archive Ads Plugin for vBulletin Copyright 2006 Computer Help Forum