i'm mainly talking about your comment when you said you "bet there would have been more deeper completions" with ramsey as the starter. i believe the seahawks would have blitzed even more than they did and thus ramsey not having the time to sit in the pocket and make the deep throw.
Good point, it's pointless to play guessing games as to what Ramsey would have done, because the circumstances would have been totally different.
Seattle would have had a different gameplan and attacked differently. It's not as cut and dry as saying well if Ramsey was in there he would have completed more deep passes. He could have also been sacked a few more times, thrown another INT or two, or not as been effective on 3rd downs.
This Ramsey stuff is really getting tired.
illdefined
10-02-2005, 10:31 PM
wtf. i was responding to someone else bringing up the switch, you know, like in a discussion? if you look around you'll find tons of praise for Brunell today.
wolfeskins
10-02-2005, 10:32 PM
Good point, it's pointless to play guessing games as to what Ramsey would have done, because the circumstances would have been totally different.
Seattle would have had a different gameplan and attacked differently. It's not as cut and dry as saying well if Ramsey was in there he would have completed more deep passes. He could have also been sacked a few more times, thrown another INT or two, or not as been effective on 3rd downs.
This Ramsey stuff is really getting tired.
thank you.
thats all i was saying.
agreed.
He was 11 of 15 on 3rd downs today folks, that's clutch. Plain and simple, that's clutch. Yet all I'm hearing is he didn't lead the WRs enough, he overthrew/underthrew, etc.
He played a pretty good game, that's all I care about.
You can pick apart any QBs performance, even guys like Peyton Manning.
Is Brunell perfect? Far from it.
Is he a heck of a lot better than last year, and far more effective than a lot of us though he could be? Hell yes.
illdefined
10-02-2005, 10:36 PM
i'm mainly talking about your comment when you said you "bet there would have been more deeper completions" with ramsey as the starter. i believe the seahawks would have blitzed even more than they did and thus ramsey not having the time to sit in the pocket and make the deep throw.
yeah i know. i saw Seattle run-blitz almost every down, i think that's the general gameplan vs. the skins no matter who's QB. again, i just think it was our OLine outmatching this particular team's blitzing LBs and Dline. good look for us.
illdefined
10-02-2005, 10:38 PM
Must say Gibbs' move to start Brunell is looking good as of now.
^^^^^^^^^
ok, ok i got it. only Brunell's name can be mentioned here. understood
Redskins8588
10-02-2005, 10:38 PM
I said it before and I will say it again, I do not care who our QB is as long as he is efficent and gets the job done...
SmootSmack
10-02-2005, 10:41 PM
^^^^^^^^^
ok, ok i got it. only Brunell's name can be mentioned here. understood
:rolleyes: :Smoker:
Big C
10-02-2005, 10:42 PM
i thought brunell played very well, very efficient. the one pass wasnt "horrible". horrible is throwing it where theres no reciever, or right to an opponent. it was a tipped ball. it was overthrown, and a mistake, but not horrible. i am extremely pleased with his play.
illdefined
10-02-2005, 10:44 PM
gotta love these admins and moderators :Smoker: