|
Pages :
1
2
[ 3]
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
VTSkins897 10-02-2005, 08:43 PM what do you mean its not like hitting the bullseye in darts, I dont get what you are saying? Brunell might have a hard time hitting the bullseye on a dart board with a football. Which is just weird underthrowing a stationary object.
Brunell is getting a lot better, but the bottom line is the scoreboard... Im very glad to have a defense that keeps us in these games.
Heres to our offense continually getting better and makign our defense better since they wont hvae to try for a shut out all the time :)
no i think you're misunderstood. you don't play darts with a football. i feel that if it hits the rec. in the hands he should snag it. to me that throw wasn't so grossly thrown that CP couldn't pull it in.
as for the darts i was sorta implying that i dont feel the QB doesnt have to hit him on the numbers every time in my opinion... wasnt the best analogy. but i went to VT so dont expect much.
SKINSnCANES 10-02-2005, 09:10 PM no i think you're misunderstood. you don't play darts with a football. i feel that if it hits the rec. in the hands he should snag it. to me that throw wasn't so grossly thrown that CP couldn't pull it in.
as for the darts i was sorta implying that i dont feel the QB doesnt have to hit him on the numbers every time in my opinion... wasnt the best analogy. but i went to VT so dont expect much.
heh, its cool, we cant all be canes ;) j/p
anyhow, as far as the throw, portis was stretched out diving and being jumped on. Hitting someone in the hands means the receiver puts his hands up and the qb puts the ball there. A dump off pass should not require a stretch dive.
SUNRA 10-02-2005, 09:16 PM As a true supporter of Brunell and his overall play today, I must admit that he ran an efficient offense to say the least. He threw to five different receivers and scrambled for a first down drive. He was robbed of his best pass of the day to Moss in the endzone, but certainly showed poise and conviction in the redzone to Royal and Sellers. Let's chalk this one up, we are 3-0 sitting on top of the NFC East Baby!
Let's also remember that Brunell didn't get much work in the offseason with the starters, so he's still working on getting his timing down with those guys.
SUNRA 10-02-2005, 09:27 PM Let's also remember that Brunell didn't get much work in the offseason with the starters, so he's still working on getting his timing down with those guys.
True that.
offiss 10-02-2005, 09:38 PM Let's also remember that Brunell didn't get much work in the offseason with the starters, so he's still working on getting his timing down with those guys.
He's had 3 regular season games plus the by week, if that's the case why didn't we here this about Ramsey? That's more quality time than he was given.
SKINSnCANES 10-02-2005, 09:40 PM Let's also remember that Brunell didn't get much work in the offseason with the starters, so he's still working on getting his timing down with those guys.
but hey, did you notice how great our defense was at stopping the screen pass...it was almost like our defense, regardless of our starting qb, gets a lot of pratice during the week at stopping the screen. lol
skinsguy 10-02-2005, 09:45 PM Overall, Brunell had a great day! That one INT was crucial and it definitely wasn't Portis' fault.
Not sure why people are complaining about the playcalling. I thought Gibbs called a great game today. Nice ball controlled offense that kept the number 2 offense off the field. If anything, think about our defense allowing the Seahawks to go 90+ yards down the field to tie the game.
wolfeskins 10-02-2005, 09:56 PM Overall, Brunell had a great day! That one INT was crucial and it definitely wasn't Portis' fault.
Not sure why people are complaining about the playcalling. I thought Gibbs called a great game today. Nice ball controlled offense that kept the number 2 offense off the field. If anything, think about our defense allowing the Seahawks to go 90+ yards down the field to tie the game.
i agree with you 100%, the only reason the game was close is because the defense had a few breakdowns today.
SUNRA 10-02-2005, 10:03 PM Overall, Brunell had a great day! That one INT was crucial and it definitely wasn't Portis' fault.
Not sure why people are complaining about the playcalling. I thought Gibbs called a great game today. Nice ball controlled offense that kept the number 2 offense off the field. If anything, think about our defense allowing the Seahawks to go 90+ yards down the field to tie the game.
12 of 17 first downs is outrageously good! The majority were on third downs and notice the penalties were at a minimum. The play calling is fine, the execution has to keep getting better. The pass to Portis would have picked up the first down. That's just the risk you take to win. We didn't play to not lose, we clearly played to win and that has been the difference this year.
|