Huddle Report Mock Draft

Pages : [1] 2 3 4 5 6

Cush
04-13-2004, 08:55 PM
http://www.thehuddlereport.com/2004DRAFT/REmock.htm

CHARGERS trade #1 & #66 to REDSKINS for #5 and OT Chris Samuels

01) Washington: Eli Manning QB Miss

BILLS trade #13 to REDSKINS for QB Patrick Ramsey

13: Washington: Vince Wilfork DT, Miami

MTK
04-13-2004, 08:58 PM
ok this makes no sense whatsoever

SmootSmack
04-13-2004, 09:00 PM
http://www.thehuddlereport.com/2004DRAFT/REmock.htm

CHARGERS trade #1 & #66 to REDSKINS for #5 and OT Chris Samuels

01) Washington: Eli Manning QB Miss

BILLS trade #13 to REDSKINS for QB Patrick Ramsey

13: Washington: Vince Wilfork DT, Miami

Well I don't see the benefits of these moves at all. This seems like those cartoons where the character jumps five feet off the ground, spins his legs and feet in a furious frenzy creating a cloud of smoke but doesn't actually go anywhere. That's my "thorough" analysis of where the Redskins would be if they made those moves

Jamaican'Skin
04-13-2004, 09:01 PM
That is possibly the most random, inaccurate thing I have ever seen.

Showtime
04-13-2004, 09:02 PM
Would anyone want Manning more than Ramsey? Not me. Ramsey has a rocket arm, is tough, and is smart.

Anyways, Matty K is right - this makes no sense at all. We might as well draft Clarett with our #5 pick instead . .

SKINSnCANES
04-13-2004, 09:28 PM
I dont think many people want to get rid of Ramsey, but if he isnt going to play for the next two to three years then mabye we should get somethign for him. I dont want to do that, but Gibbs likes his vetts and Brunell is probably going to start. I dont know if Manning would be the QB to get though. Id rather them get Taylor with five. Then trade Ramsey to get a pick then get a QB. Then we didnt get rid of our pick, and Samuels and Gardner. We could still get rid of Gardner then and mabye our pick form next year and get some dline help.

skinsfanthru&thru
04-13-2004, 09:54 PM
Even though I'd rather keep him, if we traded Ramsey, how about to Pittsburgh, trade that pick down to get a later 1st round pick and a second/or 3rd and use the new 1st round pick to draft J.P. Losman, who took Ramsey's place at Tulane and is supposed to be stronger and more mobile than Ramsey.

SKINSnCANES
04-13-2004, 09:57 PM
Some people say Losman is the best QB in the draft and has the most potential a few years down the road. Im sure he would learn a lot under Brunell to, along with Gibbs. If we had the 11th pick though id use it and get the dline of our choice to go along with Taylor at five and make our d awesome.

offiss
04-13-2004, 10:04 PM
we are not taking a QB, Gibb's does not want a rookie backup, he brought in brunell because after 2 year's he felt ramsey was still to young, we are not in a rebuilding mode we are a win now team drafting a young QB goes against all that.

SKINSnCANES
04-13-2004, 10:08 PM
We are still in a winning mode if we draft a QB, hence why he brough in Brunell. If its a backup it can be a rookie or a two year pro. Honestly i want Ramsey to start and Brunell to just be an expensive backup. Spurrier had his problems but I think he was a great tutor to Ramsey, and now beign under Gibbs Ramsey could be a probowler this year if hes given the shot.

EZ Archive Ads Plugin for vBulletin Copyright 2006 Computer Help Forum