EternalEnigma21
09-21-2005, 12:30 AM
I've been reeling all day. I worked a 12 hour shift today after staying up until 4 am drinking and laughing uncontrollably, woke up at 630 and had more energy today than I've had in months.
Where are the apologies?EternalEnigma21 09-21-2005, 12:30 AM I've been reeling all day. I worked a 12 hour shift today after staying up until 4 am drinking and laughing uncontrollably, woke up at 630 and had more energy today than I've had in months. illdefined 09-21-2005, 12:39 AM so we can get back to celebrating the historic comeback victory? are we done questioning board member's loyalties? good. skinsfan0201 09-21-2005, 01:02 AM Let's tone down all of the ignorant comments including ones about trading anyone during bye weeks. That is not wise. RedskinPete 09-21-2005, 05:30 AM I'm sorry SC -- I can't excuse 3 1/4 of just horrible QBing with 3/4 of one. I feel Ramsey would have done better throughout the game and given us a win that wouldn't have stopped my heart three times! Brunell still doesnt have me sold till he can perform anywhere near the level of the 4th quarter more than once. We have 3 unproven QBs as far as Im concerned. I have seen nothing that would say that Ramsey would have done better! I am sure he would have thrown the ball up for grabs when Brunell ran that 20+ run. For that matter has Ramsey ever had a run over 20 yards? You are right that the QB's we have are a big concern. But Brunell has been there and has done the job. Lets hope that he has something left! As for Ramsey he has never do anything and as look very bad. Campbell much to green! That Guy 09-21-2005, 06:16 AM I really am not looking for an apology. I'm looking for a couple of daredevils to just jump off the Ramsey bandwagon and hop on the winning train because the next stop is Landover, MD and Seahawks are standing in the way. I don't care who does them in, as long as we win. thank you... this is the most reasonable post in the thread ;) seriously this thread started as a troll and turned into a pissing match with the same questioning of loyalties and all the other pointless bickering we saw all last week... we WON. You're allowed to disagree with gibbs decision and still be a fan... really, its true. mooby 09-21-2005, 07:24 AM while mark brunell didn't look particulary effective for 56 minutes monday night, those two deep passes showed me something. It showed me we can have a deep passing game, and if Joe Gibbs doesn't start incorporating that into his gameplan he's not realizing how good we are, and how good we can be. That said, i do believe he will start doing that when we play Seattle. illdefined 09-21-2005, 08:23 AM Originally Posted by SUNRA I really am not looking for an apology. I'm looking for a couple of daredevils to just jump off the Ramsey bandwagon and hop on the winning train because the next stop is Landover, MD and Seahawks are standing in the way. I don't care who does them in, as long as we win. i don't see this SUNRA post anywhere on this thread. Moderators did you do something? joecrisp 09-21-2005, 08:26 AM while mark brunell didn't look particulary effective for 56 minutes monday night, those two deep passes showed me something. It showed me we can have a deep passing game, and if Joe Gibbs doesn't start incorporating that into his gameplan he's not realizing how good we are, and how good we can be. That said, i do believe he will start doing that when we play Seattle. That's pretty much how I feel about the situation. Hopefully, Brunell proved to himself and to Gibbs that he can throw the ball deep, and hopefully, Gibbs will continue to allow him to do so-- without waiting until they're backed into a corner and have no choice. The offense went nowhere (and will continue to go nowhere, like it did in the first 56 minutes against the Cowboys) if Gibbs pulls the reigns back in. Santana Moss was brought to the Redskins to do exactly what he did in the last 4 minutes of that game. Gibbs needs to maximize the use Moss's talents; in doing so, he will maximize the capabilities of this offense, and maximize this team's ability to win any game. illdefined 09-21-2005, 08:36 AM That's pretty much how I feel about the situation. Hopefully, Brunell proved to himself and to Gibbs that he can throw the ball deep, and hopefully, Gibbs will continue to allow him to do so-- without waiting until they're backed into a corner and have no choice. The offense went nowhere (and will continue to go nowhere, like it did in the first 56 minutes against the Cowboys) if Gibbs pulls the reigns back in. Santana Moss was brought to the Redskins to do exactly what he did in the last 4 minutes of that game. Gibbs needs to maximize the use Moss's talents; in doing so, he will maximize the capabilities of this offense, and maximize this team's ability to win any game. absolutely. isn't this is the consensus among all Redskins fans right now? does anybody still think we can win games with the original gameplan/offensive execution of the first 56 1/2 minutes of the Dallas game? when i did the "Dallas Game Needs A Nickname" thread, my favorite was the "The Beginning" because i really hope it is. The beginning of something *NEW* MTK 09-21-2005, 09:22 AM i don't see this SUNRA post anywhere on this thread. Moderators did you do something? It's right on page 2 of this thread http://www.thewarpath.net/showpost.php?p=108196&postcount=14 |
|
EZ Archive Ads Plugin for vBulletin Copyright 2006 Computer Help Forum