'Skins-Cowboys Game thread 9/19/05 [Archive] - Page 20


	Commanders Post at The Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum > 'Skins-Cowboys Game thread 9/19/05 PDA 'Skins-Cowboys Game thread 9/19/05 Pages : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 [20] 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 Sheriff Gonna Getcha 09-20-2005, 12:59 AM It's paypack time, we need to win one to get back for last year's miracle bomb to Crayton. PSUSkinsFan21 09-20-2005, 12:59 AM Dude, you're bragging on a QB who has a subpar winning percentage. Gimme a break. They both suck. No, again, Matty I think you're missing the point of my posts.....either that or you just don't want to admit that I'm right. Ramsey gives us a better chance to win. Period. He's had more success in Gibbs's system. He's got a better winning percentage. He's got a better QB rating. He's better than Brunell in nearly every QB category. I'm not saying Ramsey is God.....I never did. What I've consistently said is that Brunell is the worst option we have and that Ramsey should be starting over Brunell. That's it. MTK 09-20-2005, 01:02 AM No, again, Matty I think you're missing the point of my posts.....either that or you just don't want to admit that I'm right. Ramsey gives us a better chance to win. Period. He's had more success in Gibbs's system. He's got a better winning percentage. He's got a better QB rating. He's better than Brunell in nearly every QB category. I'm not saying Ramsey is God.....I never did. What I've consistently said is that Brunell is the worst option we have and that Ramsey should be starting over Brunell. That's it. Maybe I am missing your point, or maybe it's just incredibly lame. I could see your argument if Ramsey had a nice winning percentage... some sort of solid proof he's a proven winner. He's 3-4 under Gibbs and 9-14 for his career. Sorry if that fails to impress me. He sucks a little less than Brunell... that's really something to hang your hat on. :rolleyes: DirtBagZ 09-20-2005, 01:03 AM It's called shake his hand it's not a fashion show, who really cares how it looks. It does matter, and I did say shake his hand. If stuff like how it looks on TV does not matter than why did everyone get up in arms over the Randy Moss "mooning" in Green Bay? DirtBagZ 09-20-2005, 01:05 AM Did the Refs just call something in the Skins favor? MTK 09-20-2005, 01:05 AM D needs to step it up MTK 09-20-2005, 01:05 AM It does matter, and I did say shake his hand. If stuff like how it looks on TV does not matter than why did everyone get up in arms over the Randy Moss "mooning" in Green Bay? You win, he's not a man because he didn't shake his hand correctly. Who cares PSUSkinsFan21 09-20-2005, 01:07 AM Maybe I am missing your point, or maybe it's just incredibly lame. I could see your argument if Ramsey had a nice winning percentage... some sort of solid proof he's a proven winner. He's 3-4 under Gibbs and 9-14 for his career. Sorry if that fails to impress me. He sucks a little less than Brunell... that's really something to hang your hat on. :rolleyes: No, see I think the problem is you just refuse to admit that Gibbs is not perfect. He made the wrong call. You can't give me one decent reason for starting Brunell over Ramsey. The numbers don't add up. I'm not saying Ramsey is great, but can you tell me why you don't start the guy that is better in every single category? Why don't you start the guy who wins just a little more often? Why don't you start the QB with a better passer rating, more yards per attempt and completion, more total yards...etc, etc, etc??? Just tell me why you choose to start the worse option of the two. Please tell me. I mean maybe I'm way off here, but I thought the reason you play games is to win........so why not at least give yourself the best chance possible, even if that chance still isn't good? Aren't we trying to win games here? MTK 09-20-2005, 01:08 AM Holy Shit!!!!!!!!!!!! MTK 09-20-2005, 01:09 AM Oh My God