Even Theisman going against us.

dallas can win but they can't score over 18 points

I am looking at a score of 13-6 redskins.

Matty, a look at the scoreboard shows where we're different. The Cowboys scored many TDs and we didn't score one. SD's defense isn't great, but it certainly isn't bad. I'm worried about getting TDs. I think we can get FGs. In good news, Bledsoe DID throw some balls to questionable places and SD didnt take advantage, so hopefully we can do that.

You can't predict the Cowboys success against our team with the success they had against a lesser defense. If that's the case, we can look at how many points we allowed and how many points the Cowboys allowed. It's a big difference. Our defense #2, our offense #16. We gained 323 total yds. More than the Eagles, Giants and Cowboys did in total yds. Without penalties and stupid turnovers by the special teams, we win this game.

In this game, if we are going to be successful in moving the ball, Gibbs can not rely on Portis as he did last week. The short dump-offs and the screens allow Santana and David to go one on one with Newman and their other CBs. Get Sean Taylor involved early on in the game on offense. Dallas is focusing on Cooley and Portis, so throw to Mike Sellers, Rock Cartwright and Thrash. Dallas is not solid in their secondary. This is where San Diego was successful.

You can't predict the Cowboys success against our team with the success they had against a lesser defense. If that's the case, we can look at how many points we allowed and how many points the Cowboys allowed. It's a big difference. Our defense #2, our offense #16. We gained 323 total yds. More than the Eagles, Giants and Cowboys did in total yds. Without penalties and stupid turnovers by the special teams, we win this game.

In this game, if we are going to be successful in moving the ball, Gibbs can not rely on Portis as he did last week. The short dump-offs and the screens allow Santana and David to go one on one with Newman and their other CBs. Get Sean Taylor involved early on in the game on offense. Dallas is focusing on Cooley and Portis, so throw to Mike Sellers, Rock Cartwright and Thrash. Dallas is not solid in their secondary. This is where San Diego was successful.

nfl.com says we're the #6 scoring defensse and the #26 scoring offense... points win games, not yards.

nfl.com says we're the #6 scoring defensse and the #26 scoring offense... points win games, not yards.

USA TODAY reported our defense as 2# behind Buffalo, and 16# in offense. Yards are accumulated in the process of producing points. To me that's important.

Sunra - we put up tons of yards against the Bears, we won with 3 FG's. It's been our problem last year and so far this year. We're not aggressive enough to punch it in so far. Week 2 is always so important in defining a team, by then the flukes of week 1 can be exposed or get another solid win and make people realize.

just a thought, Joe (T.) made that predicton before all the recent turmoil. maybe he doesn't like Brunell, or just the effect of a sudden switch will have during the week.

Good point SUNRA about Williams knowing Bledsoe, I didn't even think of that.

Dude i'd pick the cowboys too. Do you realize that Mark Brunnel is our qb. Our only hope is that Demarcus Ware comes around the outside on the first play of the game and breaks brunnels leg and Ramsey comes back in.

based on what Chicago's offense is doing today (31 at half) we can accurately calculate that Dallas will score -12 points against us Monday.

If people are going to judge tomorrow night's game by what happened last week, then you also have to consider what's happening today...at least with the Bears.

The Bears only had one score against us....by us giving them the ball deep in our own territory. Today, the Bears score over 30 points in one half. So, the excuse that the Bears' had a rookie QB, and their offense isn't capable of scoring doesn't fly with me.

The Redskins are alot better than what some of you people are giving them credit for. Sure, I know, they'll have to prove it.