Video of all of Ramsey's and Brunnell's passes against the Bears

Pages : [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

JWsleep
09-14-2005, 10:29 PM
THis is very cool--edited by CrazyZeb on extremeskins. :biggthump

Week 1: Ramsey vs Brunell - A Video Analysis (http://www.extremeskins.com/forums/showthread.php?t=114367)

Well worth checking out. Pretty much confirms what we've been saying in both directions.

The hit on Ramsey is one of the most obvious and egregious personal fouls I've seen in a while. I still get completely pissed everytime I see it. WTF.

MTK
09-14-2005, 10:36 PM
By the way was that LB fined yet?

JWsleep
09-14-2005, 10:39 PM
I have not heard anything, which is disturbing...

TheMalcolmConnection
09-14-2005, 10:46 PM
Is it just me or do both of them look pretty good?

The deep passes Brunell threw were pretty damn close. I'm not worried about the dinks and dunks as long as I see him going deep every now and then.

Hail to the Redskins
09-14-2005, 11:11 PM
Let's just throw this out there..

Ramsey starts the game 1 for 4 for 4 yds, INT...

he then goes 5 for 7 for 101 yards (not bad AT ALL!) BUT...

if the bogus penalty on Cooley wasn't called it becomes 6 for 8 for 107 yds, TD. AND don't forget Portis drops a VERY catchable ball in there that would have been a 7 yarder which would have made him 7 for 8 for 114yds, TD after his first 4 attempts. I'd say that's damn good for ANY quarterback in the NFL in their first REAL action of the season after getting warmed-up (first 4 attempts).

Also let's DEFINITELY not forget the Brunell threw an INT into Vasher's hands as well, only his was called back due to penalty. So basically, Ramsey has a TD called back, and Brunell has a pick called back...

This is nuts. It even looked like Patrick was starting to look comfortable out there for once. It is VERY clear from watching the 2 play that you have 2 basic options. You can go with the Favre-type QB in the sense that he can and will get big chunks of yards on some plays yet throw a few INTs as well, or a guy who can only be ULTRA--ULTRA CONSERVATIVE throwing slants and WR screens but not many INTs. We proved last year that you HAVE to TRY and go downfield to help the running game and to score FREAKING TOUCHDOWNS to win games!! Remember that if we would have scored on average 21 points per game last year (which is less than the 6-10 panthers scored) we'd have been 11-5!!!

Can Brunell lead this team to the Super Bowl?? NO. Let Ramsey PROVE... I mean REALLY prove his isn't the future...

SUNRA
09-14-2005, 11:15 PM
Well it confirmed to me that Brunell looked damn good considering last year. Picking up the bad snap and turning it into a 15 yd. pass was impressive. Brunell knew what to do when the play was dead. No fumbles, no Ints. Lets wait and see if he can pick up where he left off.

SUNRA
09-14-2005, 11:20 PM
Let's just throw this out there..

Ramsey starts the game 1 for 4 for 4 yds, INT...

he then goes 5 for 7 for 101 yards (not bad AT ALL!) BUT...

if the bogus penalty on Cooley wasn't called it becomes 6 for 8 for 107 yds, TD. AND don't forget Portis drops a VERY catchable ball in there that would have been a 7 yarder which would have made him 7 for 8 for 114yds, TD after his first 4 attempts. I'd say that's damn good for ANY quarterback in the NFL in their first REAL action of the season after getting warmed-up (first 4 attempts).

Also let's DEFINITELY not forget the Brunell threw an INT into Vasher's hands as well, only his was called back due to penalty. So basically, Ramsey has a TD called back, and Brunell has a pick called back...

This is nuts. It even looked like Patrick was starting to look comfortable out there for once. It is VERY clear from watching the 2 play that you have 2 basic options. You can go with the Favre-type QB in the sense that he can and will get big chunks of yards on some plays yet throw a few INTs as well, or a guy who can only be ULTRA--ULTRA CONSERVATIVE throwing slants and WR screens but not many INTs. We proved last year that you HAVE to TRY and go downfield to help the running game and to score FREAKING TOUCHDOWNS to win games!! Remember that if we would have scored on average 21 points per game last year (which is less than the 6-10 panthers scored) we'd have been 11-5!!!

Can Brunell lead this team to the Super Bowl?? NO. Let Ramsey PROVE... I mean REALLY prove his isn't the future...

Who cares who leads this team to the Super Bowl? This shit is getting ridiculous.

SmootSmack
09-14-2005, 11:24 PM
Well it confirmed to me that Brunell looked damn good considering last year. Picking up the bad snap and turning it into a 15 yd. pass was impressive. Brunell knew what to do when the play was dead. No fumbles, no Ints. Lets wait and see if he can pick up where he left off.

I agree 100% with that.

If I saw right there was just one three-and-out the entire game (yes, it was Brunell). But anyway, that's a good job by our offense. And nice job by our receivers to run the right distance to get those first downs.

DirtBagZ
09-14-2005, 11:56 PM
Who cares who leads this team to the Super Bowl? This shit is getting ridiculous.

I actually agree with you, it is ridiculous to think either Ramsey or Brunell is going to lead this team to the Super Bowl. Not going to happen, especially not going to happen with Brunell.

That Guy
09-15-2005, 12:02 AM
I agree 100% with that.

If I saw right there was just one three-and-out the entire game (yes, it was Brunell). But anyway, that's a good job by our offense. And nice job by our receivers to run the right distance to get those first downs.

there MAY have been a 2nd, that 36yard penalty was basically a free 3 points for us... to bad we gave them a free 7 in return :(

either way, lets hope dallas goes a bit better. and i agree, we're not looking at a super bowl right now, we're looking for 8-8 and on from there.

EZ Archive Ads Plugin for vBulletin Copyright 2006 Computer Help Forum