why not cut nemo?

Pages : [1] 2 3

jamf
09-13-2005, 08:40 PM
im glad to see brown go, i dont think he will make an impact anywhere else. trackstars are a dime a dozen...

but we only had 4 WR's now and jacobs cant get on the field so basicly we have 3 for mondays game.
does anyone else have a problems with this?
moss missed some time last game with a calf injury. patten has missed alot of time in his career. thrash is solid(hope i dont jinx him :( )

with one injury we drastically limit our offence.

i like nemo but rock is better than he is on offence and special teams and there is alot of depth at rb/fb. nemo should be gone or maybe one of the clemons brothers.


btw, at some point we have to get rid of john hall if he cant stay healthy. we are wasting a roster spot on his bad hamstrings/quadriceps.

That Guy
09-13-2005, 08:43 PM
i think killing and raymer are next on the list, nemo is the big back. rock is more of a catching out of the backfield type rb that can do some short yardage... a bunch of his 3rd and 1s in 2003 where runs to the outside.

skinsguy
09-13-2005, 08:43 PM
I like Nemo and feel he's going to be a deciding factor in our offense eventually. Brown had so much potiential, but he couldn't make it as a wide receiver and fumbling on kick offs is a no-no.

We could always resign Dyson if we need another person at WR. I don't believe he signed with anyone else did he?

illdefined
09-13-2005, 08:45 PM
how did everyone forget about our #4 WR Sean Taylor?

BossHog
09-13-2005, 08:46 PM
I've said it before. Bring back Farris. He's a solid WR and returner. You'd think if we wanted a 6' 3" 230 lb WR (Taylor) we would've drafted one or held on to Gardner or McCants. Moving Nemo isn't neccessary until you have another prospect. And how come we didn't see him in fourth and short situations against CHI? :oink:

BossHog
09-13-2005, 08:49 PM
We could always resign Dyson if we need another person at WR. I don't believe he signed with anyone else did he?

Dyson (and McCants) seemed to undermine what we were doing on offense, as if the offense, or Ramsey, wasn't working. :oink:

skinsguy
09-13-2005, 08:51 PM
I forgot about Farris - he had a very good game against the Ravens.

e16bball
09-13-2005, 08:53 PM
We can definitely use a big WR now. The speedsters have been effectively rendered useless by the QB switch.

skinsguy
09-13-2005, 09:02 PM
*Yawn* Is this going to be in every thread?

Riggo44
09-13-2005, 10:20 PM
I've said it before. Bring back Farris. He's a solid WR and returner. You'd think if we wanted a 6' 3" 230 lb WR (Taylor) we would've drafted one or held on to Gardner or McCants. Moving Nemo isn't neccessary until you have another prospect. And how come we didn't see him in fourth and short situations against CHI? :oink:
I agree. Farris would be a welcome addition in my book. I really like how he always went 100 miles an hour. I was bumed we cut him.

EZ Archive Ads Plugin for vBulletin Copyright 2006 Computer Help Forum