|
|
rickmmrr 09-13-2005, 01:17 PM You can’t deny that Brunell has looked more confident and more comfortable then Ramsey all pre-season and the first game. He’s had zip on his passes and been very accurate and don’t give me that crap about (He was playing with scrubs) because number one when a receiver was open he got him the ball and number two when he was in trouble with a rush or whatever he didn’t do anything stupid and in some cases he kept the drive alive be getting out of trouble and completing the pass.
So at this point the only beef anyone can muster against Brunnel is he can’t throw the deep ball. Well he can’t throw it as deep as Ramsey but he can throw it well enough to get the job done.
I like Ramsey and if Ramsey was the future for us I’d say keep him in and let him learn but he isn’t. I’m not happy about that but that’s not my decision. I hope Ramsey has a great career but it won’t be with the redskins.
skins052bgr8 09-13-2005, 01:21 PM It won't satisfy me or get me on the Brunell bandwagon, he is serviceable will not produce alot of wins and make the game so horrible to watch. I never ever turn the TV off and rarely miss a play when the skins are playing, but damn Ramsey made it so much more fun to watch with a much improved vertical attack and would eventually spread the D out and only improve the running game and we could get back to Redskins ball. The receivers can get down field and need the ball to get to them without having the corners having so much time to adjust or recover with a lofted deep ball that is sputtering to get to them. What kind of accuracy can you expect from his deep ball when all he is doing is poutting everything he has into it and pray that it is deep enough.
Schneed10 09-13-2005, 01:22 PM What a bunch of babies.
Our D can kill any QB the Cow-Whores put in, Bledsoe looked horrible initially, the Bolts didn't finish the job. Our D won't be a nice.
As for our Offense, Cow-Whores are far too aggressive a D, we'll run all over them.
Quit your whining.
Yeah seriously, I'm with you, Rat.
This is absurd. The Chargers ran all over Dallas, we can too. And our D is a lot better than San Diego's. You guys do realize we moved the ball really well against a really tough Bears defense? If we just stop turning the ball over we'll be good. I like Brunell better in that department.
I'm on the Brunell bandwagon for good. I think the Dallas game will be a war and it is a tough one to call. But saying we don't have a chance is just crazy.
illdefined 09-13-2005, 01:27 PM Brunell is 36. he is a dead end no matter HOW HE PLAYS this year. i can't be on his bandwagon because i havent seen enough *regular season* proof that he's magically improved while Ramsey magically regressed over last season to not have the same winning day in Dallas.
i'd rather see Campbell or Ramsey build with the franchise then rely on a temporary (no one can deny he's temporary) hope that a past star can reach his former potential one last time.
backrow 09-13-2005, 01:28 PM If Brunell leads the offense down the field and scores us enough to beat Dallas, then will guys finally jump on the bandwagon? Would you be happy?
2nd Question: In that case then, what would your expectations for the team become?
Oh ye of little faith! I can't figure out the "If we beat dallas" philosophy. Don't you mean "When we beat the cowroids Monday, and when M. Brunell leads the team down the field and scores more than enough to beat the 'roids, will guys finally jump on the bandwagon? Yes! Would I be happy?
Yes!
You need to check the fluids in those Burgandy glasses my friend!
LadyT 09-13-2005, 01:29 PM Brunell is 36. he is a dead end no matter HOW HE PLAYS this year. i can't be on his bandwagon because i havent seen enough *regular season* proof that he's magically improved while Ramsey magically regressed over last season to not have the same winning day in Dallas.
i'd rather see Campbell or Ramsey build with the franchise then rely on a temporary (no one can deny he's temporary) hope that a past star can reach his former potential one last time.
Well said. In fact, I question if MB is even a temporary hope. For me, that temporary hope faded after 9 games last year.
Just for the record, Brunell is turning 35 on 9/17.
I agree with Schneed, people thinking we are going to get crushed are giving up far too easily. Our D matches should contain their O... we really are trying to emulate the 2000 Ravens season now. Looking back at the game, Brunell did make a couple of plays. The bad snap he picked up from shotgun and turned into a completion... that's pretty much it, but it's something.
One thing I do like out of all of this, the last few years we have been the obviously better team and still found a way to lose to them. Since it's now widely believed (not by me) that they are a better team, maybe bizarro logic dictates they will find a way to lose to us.
FRPLG 09-13-2005, 01:33 PM What a bunch of babies.
Our D can kill any QB the Cow-Whores put in, Bledsoe looked horrible initially, the Bolts didn't finish the job. Our D won't be as nice.
As for our Offense, Cow-Whores are far too aggressive a D, we'll run all over them.
Quit your whining.
I tend to agree here. I think we'll be much the same as last year this season. We'll be in just about every game and maybe with some luck here and there grab a playoff spot.
Schneed10 09-13-2005, 01:40 PM Just in general, no matter who wins at QB, we should still be happy. Even if you don't like the decision, I mean, you're still a Redskins fan. And Mark Brunell is indeed a Redskin, so I'd think we're all rooting for him.
So of course we'll all be happy. Despite our differences on the boards today, that one thing still binds us together. We all still want the Skins to win more than anything. And still:
:dallas:
|