Ramsey/Brunell: a closer look

Anyone else wish we had taken a chance on Trent Dilfer instead of Heath Shuler.

Maybe he could have been the long term game manager that we needed and then we wouldnt have to worry about Mark Brunell and Patrick Ramsey.

Guys,

I haven't posted in a while but I am torn on this issue. Naturally I'll support whoever Gibbs puts in there. I just don't see what everyone is basing Brunell's ability to "play not to lose is." Did we not try that last year and fail? Brunell played well against the second-string D in the preseason. Some people at the stadium seem to forget that about a year ago people wanted Brunell's head on a platter.

I was at the game and when Brunell came in throwing a grounder followed by a jump ball thrown so poorly that the defender almost couldn't not interfere, the I started to have my doubts. Brunell made a good throw or two sure but I think he got us the three FGs primarily by handing the ball to the RBs. And guess what? Our leading/only scorer is not out with an injured leg. I think the need to get some yardage/TDs has increased more than slightly.

Now that might work against the Bears, albeit only by 2 pts. Is it going to hold against Dallas? Kansas City? Hell, even the Giants are putting up 6 TDs.

I don't think we're going to know anything until Tuesday morning and Brunell having received most of the snaps in practice. As a Redskins fan I've learned to appreciate every win due to the infrequency of their occurence. That being said, this was the first time in a long time I left the stadium after a win very unimpressed. When putting a 36 y/o who got yanked last year is an improvement I think we are in trouble. Only time will tell though and as always when I'm doubting the 'Skins; I hope that I am incorrect.

Here's to hoping for a win in Dallas. Go 'Skins!

Guys,

I haven't posted in a while but I am torn on this issue. Naturally I'll support whoever Gibbs puts in there. I just don't see what everyone is basing Brunell's ability to "play not to lose is." Did we not try that last year and fail? Brunell played well against the second-string D in the preseason. Some people at the stadium seem to forget that about a year ago people wanted Brunell's head on a platter.

I was at the game and when Brunell came in throwing a grounder followed by a jump ball thrown so poorly that the defender almost couldn't not interfere, the I started to have my doubts. Brunell made a good throw or two sure but I think he got us the three FGs primarily by handing the ball to the RBs. And guess what? Our leading/only scorer is not out with an injured leg. I think the need to get some yardage/TDs has increased more than slightly.

Now that might work against the Bears, albeit only by 2 pts. Is it going to hold against Dallas? Kansas City? Hell, even the Giants are putting up 6 TDs.

I don't think we're going to know anything until Tuesday morning and Brunell having received most of the snaps in practice. As a Redskins fan I've learned to appreciate every win due to the infrequency of their occurence. That being said, this was the first time in a long time I left the stadium after a win very unimpressed. When putting a 36 y/o who got yanked last year is an improvement I think we are in trouble. Only time will tell though and as always when I'm doubting the 'Skins; I hope that I am incorrect.

Here's to hoping for a win in Dallas. Go 'Skins!
Thank you for clearly stating what I was too lazy to type.

We'll be lucky to get a 3rd for him.

I disagree. AJ Feeley yielded a 2nd rounder. Ramsey's cap number will be low next year, there's no reason some team out there won't be willing to give up at least a 2nd rounder. I don't think a 1st is out of the question, a lot of people think all Ramsey needs is a change of scenery.

Guys,
I haven't posted in a while but I am torn on this issue. Naturally I'll support whoever Gibbs puts in there. I just don't see what everyone is basing Brunell's ability to "play not to lose is." Did we not try that last year and fail? Brunell played well against the second-string D in the preseason. Some people at the stadium seem to forget that about a year ago people wanted Brunell's head on a platter.

Well, it's not last year. You'll note that Brunell was hurt last year during the Giants game (2nd game of the season). That hamstring injury made it hard for him to get much mustard on his throws. That explains why his passes have much more zip this year.

Also, the offensive line was dismal last year when Brunell was playing. They sure look a lot better now.

I think with his arm and legs back to 100%, and a better team around him, all the ingredients are there for him to make the same throws that Ramsey can make. Only difference is that Brunell is less likely to turn it over, seeing that he knows how to get rid of the ball before being sacked and fumbling.

To a point I have flip-flopped.

I supported Gibbs' decision to stick by Ramsey, even though he was struggling I was thinking well there must be something that Gibbs sees in him to keep sticking with him. Maybe he's close to turning the corner.

Now it's obvious he isn't close to turning that corner. Gibbs has decided to pull the plug before things get ugly. He stuck by Brunell last year way too long and he's not going to repeat that.

Now I'm supporting Gibbs' decision to make the switch.

Looking at the big picture, and keeping emotion out of it, Brunell is the better option right now.

I don't know why there's this view that people can't change their minds.

Winning in the NFL and in life is all about adapting to change and making adjustments on the fly.

Sticking to a plan is great, but when circumstances dictate a change in plans, sticking to your plan just for the sake of sticking to it is not a smart thing to do.

the point is, Ramsey was clearly the better option last year, and Gibbs didn't take it. he saw something in Brunell too, he didn't turn any corner, but he stayed with him and it killed our season. that proved he was fallible, and is the only reason we're questioning him now. it's not emotion, it's *recent memory*.

10 games was too way too long last year but 19 minutes??

You know who Ramsey sort of reminds me of? Gus Frerotte.

The guy came in and showed flashes of being a starting quartback in this league. Ultimately, he made too many mistakes under pressure and started doubting his own talent and ability.

He bounced around and actually played well when given the opportunity. He kept bouncing around and finally has gotten an opportunity to be the man. I think he is going to surprise a lot of people this year. Also, there is something about being bounced around that strengthens the resolve of people with strong wills.

I think mentally, most QBs are going to go through some really difficult times in the NFL. How they deal with it will determine what kind of player they are. Ramsey whining for a trade like some schoolboy bitch is really pathetic. He knows how he played, he needs to suck it up and accept the fact that he is not ready yet.

On Ramsey, the interceptions are quite frustrating. But I recognize interceptions are going to happen, and Brunell might not be much of an improvement in that department. But to me the difference is Brunell knows how to get rid of the ball. He has that internal clock in his head that tells him when a play is busted. He did a nice job of scrambling out of the pocket and throwing the ball away on Sunday. The interceptions are frustrating, but the fumbles at the hands of the pass rush are the most frustrating thing. You can't sit in the pocket and wait to get drilled. And since intentional grounding can only be called when you're in the tackle box, it sure would help if we had a QB who could actually get out of the tackle box to get rid of the ball.

Ramsey is a turnover waiting to happen and that's not going to change. He has great games occasionally for sure, but the turnovers and sacks are not worth it. Time for a change.

the point is, Ramsey was clearly the better option last year, and Gibbs didn't take it. he saw something in Brunell too, he didn't turn any corner, but he stayed with him and it killed our season. that proved he was fallible, and is the only reason we're questioning him now. it's not emotion, it's *recent memory*.

10 games was too way too long last year but 19 minutes??

Those 19 minutes resulted in one interception on a badly thrown ball, and two fumbles. Luckily only one was recovered by the Bears.

In the NFL these days, you can't sit in the pocket and wait and wait and wait. In the NFL now, the pass rush is coming. Be it in the form of Jevon Kearse, Michael Strahan, Demarcus Ware, or a host of blitzing LBs and safeties. Defenses bring the house nowadays. You can't sit and wait for it, you have to get rid of the ball. That has always been Ramsey's #1 problem, and we can't wait for that to change any longer. He should have shown progress by now.

It's tempting to keep playing Ramsey because when he has time to throw he'll gash the defense. But no offensive line is perfect and we shouldn't expect them to be. One fumble per game is too many, but two in 19 minutes?? The line must be drawn somewhere. The tone must be set: WE DON'T TOLERATE TURNOVERS ON THIS TEAM.