Two major concerns

this thread is specifically about "Major Concerns" and SUNRA is just expressing his. the lack of a large, physical receiver on the roster is a legitimate one, and it's already been noticed around the NFL. it's not being "negative" its being "concerned", hence the thread title. so back off him guys.

Is it just me illdefined, skinnyfan and TAFKAS, but do you sense a concerted effort by JWSleep, backrow and the other space cadet that they haven't matured to the point where they can read a post to which they dissagree and not post an intelligent point of view in response? Let's face it, some people just aren't bold enough to step outside of the box and think independently. They just go along to get along. What a pity.

And to make things nice and peaceful MattyK, I will NEVER respond in kind to any post that doesn't use an intelligent rationale for their point of view. That's a waste of all of our time.

well calling people space cadet certainly isn't the right way to go or get intelligent rationale across. though i'm pretty sure if your WR concern came from say, Curmudgeon, it wouldn't be getting the reaction you're getting. not sure if it's cuz of the poster, the name, tone or what, but i think keeping things light all around is the way to go.

i expressed your exact WR concerns before as well, and these things always end up the same way. let's wait and see. this is just a football discussion site, and we're all rooting for the same team.

Is it just me illdefined, skinnyfan and TAFKAS, but do you sense a concerted effort by JWSleep, backrow and the other space cadet that they haven't matured to the point where they can read a post to which they dissagree and not post an intelligent point of view in response? Let's face it, some people just aren't bold enough to step outside of the box and think independently. They just go along to get along. What a pity.

And to make things nice and peaceful MattyK, I will NEVER respond in kind to any post that doesn't use an intelligent rationale for their point of view. That's a waste of all of our time.

wow, so you're calling people immature a-holes and then saying you'd never reply without using an intelligent rationale ;)

how.... ironic.

backrow, JW Sleep and whoever else you're talking about have had several solid, intelligent posts. Bottom line, as illdefined says, we all want the same thing. And we're going to disagree about how to get there. BUT if things turn personal and petty then, of course, we moderators have no choice but to start locking threads. Let's try to avoid that

Santana Moss (http://www.redskins.com/news/newsDetail.jsp?id=3753) addresses SUNRA's concerns