jermus22
07-27-2005, 09:16 AM
I'd prefer to compare Campbell to a young Doug Williams, although from all I've heard, Campbell has already developed a nice touch on his long passes that Williams lacked early in his career. Both have (had) rocket arms able to throw any pass in the book, both excelled on medium to long range passes, and both were good scramblers with excellent mobility (Williams scrambled far less in his later years, when he played in Washington). However, Williams was often maligned for overthrowing receivers; the papers said he was the only person who could overthrow the regime in Iran. It wasn't until after a few years in the USFL that Williams improved on his touch, allowing him to torch secondaries once he joined the 'Skins. Expect Campbell to have his share of growing pains, but also expect him to contribute sometime in the next two or three years.
firstdown
07-27-2005, 09:53 AM
It will be intresting to see who ends up as our second string QB. I would say that skip it to him Brunell would be listed as our 2nd starting off but as thing progress that could change.
TheMalcolmConnection
07-27-2005, 10:01 AM
I'd prefer Campbell to win the backup job. It's only going to stunt his development to have him as third string...
...unless they ARE planning on replacing Ramsey and I'll forego beating an already dead and decomposing horse.
Brunell in all likelihood be the backup this year.
I'm actually kinda interested to see how Brunell looks this preseason.
Paintrain
07-27-2005, 11:15 AM
I expect Campbell to be the backup no later than midseason and if the Redskins struggle he will play (assuming QB is part of the problem) once the playoffs are out of reach.. Obviously hoping that we don't have to worry about that as we roll towards the postseason! :httr:
Davnpurt
07-27-2005, 11:20 AM
Brunell in all likelihood be the backup this year.
I'm actually kinda interested to see how Brunell looks this preseason.
Me too. I haven't heard a thing about him this offseason; did he/does he have any lingering injuries, what are his feelings on PR being the starter, etc...
This Campbell kid is an interesting cat. Because of the success of African-American QBs like McNabb, Culpepper, Vick et al in the passing game (maybe not Vick yet) he won't be dogged with questions about him being a scrambling QB who occassionally passes which can only bode well for his attitude and confidence. As for comparisons size wise btw himself and Culpepper thats wholly unrealistic. Daunte looks like a d tackle.
TheMalcolmConnection
07-27-2005, 11:31 AM
I just want to see Campbell in for mop up duty after Portis has run for 200+ yards and our receivers have caught a couple touchdown passes.
Schneed10
07-27-2005, 11:42 AM
Brunell in all likelihood be the backup this year.
I'm actually kinda interested to see how Brunell looks this preseason.
Amen. It would be interesting to see how much of Brunell's crappy play was attributable the players around him last year. He had to play with guys who had no idea what was going on.
Then again, there's no excuse for his 1-8 performance against the Bengals (that was the Bengals game, right?). I remember Ramsey coming in and playing much better that day.
But the point remains, Brunell probably wouldn't be nearly as bad this year as he was last year. That said, I'd still prefer PR of course. But I don't mind having Mark Brunell as my backup QB, not one bit.
Schneed10
07-27-2005, 11:48 AM
Campbell is actually an inch taller at 6-5, but Culpepper outweighs him by a good 35 pounds
Yeah it's the weight that makes the difference. Duante can run LBs over at the goalline when he wants to. Campbell would have to run around them.
SmootSmack
07-27-2005, 11:54 AM
Amen. It would be interesting to see how much of Brunell's crappy play was attributable the players around him last year. He had to play with guys who had no idea what was going on.
Then again, there's no excuse for his 1-8 performance against the Bengals (that was the Bengals game, right?). I remember Ramsey coming in and playing much better that day.
But the point remains, Brunell probably wouldn't be nearly as bad this year as he was last year. That said, I'd still prefer PR of course. But I don't mind having Mark Brunell as my backup QB, not one bit.
Agree with all your points here...but what really concerns me is this. If we release Rod Gardner, then which wide receiver will throw the touchdown passes on our trick plays? If Gardner could do nothing else, it was throw ducks into the end zone