Patten on Ramsey

http://www.unc.edu/~mirabile/Wonderlic.htm (http://www.unc.edu/%7Emirabile/Wonderlic.htm)

Heath Shuler scored a 16.

You're such a stick in the mud. IT WAS A JOKE!

I hope no one thinks I'm rooting for Campbell over Ramsey just because I pointed out some areas where Ramsey needs to improve. Truth is I'm really hoping Ramsey has a Pro Bowl year and leads us to the playoffs. I'm not completely convinced he will, but I like the guy's attitude, guts, and work ethic, and I think he may have the talent and intagibles to take us all the way. Only time will tell.

I also like everything I heard about Campbell but I never got to see him play. Offiss, you wanted to know how his abilities fit into those of a Gibbs type qb. My post in the "Campbell is Culpepper clone?" thread should answer your question. His skills are reminscint of Doug Williams, who did a pretty darn good job under Gibbs. Am I saying Ramsey isn't the answer? No. I'm wishing the best for him. I'm only saying it's nice to have Campbell on board in case things go sour. :)

You're such a stick in the mud. IT WAS A JOKE!
Curiously, Jeff George damn near did score under his jersey number (which was #3).

I hope no one thinks I'm rooting for Campbell over Ramsey just because I pointed out some areas where Ramsey needs to improve. Truth is I'm really hoping Ramsey has a Pro Bowl year and leads us to the playoffs. I'm not completely convinced he will, but I like the guy's attitude, guts, and work ethic, and I think he may have the talent and intagibles to take us all the way. Only time will tell.

I also like everything I heard about Campbell but I never got to see him play. Offiss, you wanted to know how his abilities fit into those of a Gibbs type qb. My post in the "Campbell is Culpepper clone?" thread should answer your question. His skills are reminscint of Doug Williams, who did a pretty darn good job under Gibbs. Am I saying Ramsey isn't the answer? No. I'm wishing the best for him. I'm only saying it's nice to have Campbell on board in case things go sour. :)


I don't mind having the guy on board, my problem is we gave up a ton for a 3 year project, since Gibbs arrived he's been over evaluating players talents, and giving up way to much, Brunell, Portis, and now Campbell.

I don't mind having the guy on board, my problem is we gave up a ton for a 3 year project, since Gibbs arrived he's been over evaluating players talents, and giving up way to much, Brunell, Portis, and now Campbell.

Three years??? I did not know you have the ability to look into the future.

IF (and that is a big if) Campbell wins the Redskins a Superbowl or plays at a probowl level and gets us into the playoffs, the price will not have been too much. It will have been worth it.
Gibss is not perfect, but he did make one good player choice, when he choose Sean Taylor over Kellen Winslow II.

Three years??? I did not know you have the ability to look into the future.

IF (and that is a big if) Campbell wins the Redskins a Superbowl or plays at a probowl level and gets us into the playoffs, the price will not have been too much. It will have been worth it.
Gibss is not perfect, but he did make one good player choice, when he choose Sean Taylor over Kellen Winslow II.


I do, just take a look at my past comments about Brunell, and the Portis trade, I was dead on, as I will be with Campbell it's only a matter of time.

If Ramsey can't get it done under Gibbs, no way Campbell will either.

Gibbs has made much more than just 1 good decision in Taylor regardless of how much of a problem this kid turns out to be, he has defiently made good moves Cooley was a tremendous move for us, the problem is he is creating a big problem cap wise with highly over priced players, Brunell and Portis are absolultly killing us cap wise we have something like 95 mil tied up between the 2, I like Clinton but not for what we gave up in trade or money, and couple that with the fact that we have to redesign the offensive blocking schemes for him [ which by the way I said we would have to do when we traded for him ] I just feel other backs were available at far more reasonable price that would have been more conducive to Gibbs style of offensive running game.

Regardless of how those backs would have played, it wasn't because Clinton was too small, it was because the offense was outdated. Even if he had a bruiser back, I don't think it would have been that much better.