2024 Commanders Off-Season Thread

Pages : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 [32] 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48

Meks
05-14-2024, 11:23 PM
Surely the pr people who let him walk in front of the presser weren't oblivious either. It's clear they are trying to figure out a way to re-engage the fan base and if it means keeping commanders they're going to struggle for a long time in my opinion.

edit: Also the people who are selling that shirt are going to make money where the Washington doesn't, Or vice versa if they are selling it through a third party and trying to gauge interest My brother JoeRedskin already bought that shirt, nd he hasn't bought Washington gear since the any of the changes, so I have a feeling it's going to have more interest than anything the Washington Commander sells

Sent from my SM-G781U using Tapatalk


Me either, (any non redskins stuff anyway) ..... and I'd buy that shirt.

Chief X_Phackter
05-14-2024, 11:35 PM
People in the military have worn feathers on their uniforms before. Those shirts are awesome. You're crazy.

https://tile.loc.gov/storage-services/service/pnp/ppmsca/67600/67684r.jpg

:D

:food-smil

nonniey
05-15-2024, 12:00 AM
I used to argue the etymology thesis, then came around to the simple realization that the days of one race using another race as a mascot are over.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

That is not what the discussion was about. What kicked this off was a claim that Redskins is a derogatory term. It's not and I provided enough evidence that shows it is not.

CRedskinsRule
05-15-2024, 02:08 AM
That is not what the discussion was about. What kicked this off was a claim that Redskins is a derogatory term. It's not and I provided enough evidence that shows it is not.no, you chose to argue that one point from a larger discussion of the name. most members said your point was irrelevant to the name argument and not worth revisiting. Ultimately, this whole discussion is off of the thread topic and could have been dropped, but the name issue still burns a lot of fans.

Sent from my SM-G781U using Tapatalk

MTK
05-15-2024, 09:17 AM
I used to argue the etymology thesis, then came around to the simple realization that the days of one race using another race as a mascot are over.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

That's what it boils down to, wild to me some still think anything NA related would actually fly as a potential new name.

I think new ownership is hoping for a quick turnaround, nothing will distract from the name like winning and an exciting young star QB. I also think a revamp of the uniforms is much more likely than another full re-branding.

mooby
05-15-2024, 09:28 AM
That's what it boils down to, wild to me some still think anything NA related would actually fly as a potential new name.

I think new ownership is hoping for a quick turnaround, nothing will distract from the name like winning and an exciting young star QB. I also think a revamp of the uniforms is much more likely than another full re-branding.

I would happily settle for a stud team and a uniform revamping. Honestly think the whole rebranding thing was mailed in, that whole "fan suggestions" thing was bs and Snyder liked Commanders from day one. The uniforms gotta be the most uninspiring look ever. Burgundy and gold was iconic and there wasn't a damn thing wrong with the colors.

If we get a competitive team and the uniforms are re-done I'll drop the name change argument.

nonniey
05-15-2024, 09:51 AM
no, you chose to argue that one point from a larger discussion of the name. most members said your point was irrelevant to the name argument and not worth revisiting. Ultimately, this whole discussion is off of the thread topic and could have been dropped, but the name issue still burns a lot of fans.

Sent from my SM-G781U using Tapatalk

And as I said I'll always throw the bullshit flag when that one (false) point is made. And anyone that knows that point is BS should always confront it when it is made.

calia
05-15-2024, 10:43 AM
That is not what the discussion was about. What kicked this off was a claim that Redskins is a derogatory term. It's not and I provided enough evidence that shows it is not.


This is pure opinion, not fact. And you’re shouting at clouds anyway - the name is gone and not coming back. It makes no sense to argue about any of this. We should be discussing the rookie minicamp, the upcoming schedule, Newton’s surgery, how Jacoby continues to get screwed by the HOF - basically anything related to football instead of rehashing this nonsense.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Redskin Jim
05-15-2024, 10:47 AM
This is pure opinion, not fact. And you’re shouting at clouds anyway - the name is gone and not coming back. It makes no sense to argue about any of this. We should be discussing the rookie minicamp, the upcoming schedule, Newton’s surgery, how Jacoby continues to get screwed by the HOF - basically anything related to football instead of rehashing this nonsense.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

The name is not “fine”. It’s easily the weakest/stupidest name in the NFL, mirroring the clown who foisted it on us.

BaltimoreSkins
05-15-2024, 11:28 AM
https://media.giphy.com/media/v1.Y2lkPTc5MGI3NjExdG9rYzVhYjMxM29mNDZlcnJiMnBkODd lMTQxM3B6Z2Z5Z2dhY2VnMiZlcD12MV9pbnRlcm5hbF9naWZfY nlfaWQmY3Q9Zw/3oEjHGZQS3Xvo94aty/giphy.gif

EZ Archive Ads Plugin for vBulletin Copyright 2006 Computer Help Forum