|
nonniey 08-06-2024, 09:53 PM I do not understand how somebody could go from voting for Kamala Harris and then she makes a VP pick that is in line with her views and you switch to Trump. Sitting out I understand, switching to Trump - no because they're two diametrically opposed opponents. In short I don't believe you're too colleagues we're going to vote for Kamala they were probably just saying that but we're going to vote for Trump no matter what. Of course I don't understand how anyone is voting for Trump or Harris at this point so I'm just stuck in the middle with no one to vote for or to represent me.
Sent from my SM-S711U using Tapatalk
I think they were hoping (praying) she wouldn't go full bore Progressive if she won, but by picking Walz she is demonstrating she is going to go full bore progressive which for those two (and me) killed our long shot hopes. (Plus for one of them he really liked Kelley - he is our Senator).
sdskinsfan2001 08-07-2024, 01:44 AM A requirement to be a democrat voter is to a habitual, degenerate liar. If you expect a democrat to be politically honest, you're naive or stupid.
Chief X_Phackter 08-07-2024, 02:22 AM I think they were hoping (praying) she wouldn't go full bore Progressive if she won, but by picking Walz she is demonstrating she is going to go full bore progressive which for those two (and me) killed our long shot hopes. (Plus for one of them he really liked Kelley - he is our Senator).
It's definitely an interesting pick to say the least. I feel like if she had picked Shapiro she probably wins somewhat comfortably in November. Especially if she never puts herself in a position where she has answer a question about her past or her plans for the future.
It's probably the worst choice for her chances, right? Does adding him to the ticket entice the moderates or the independents? I don't think so. Those 'lefter' than left are in the bag, though... but they already were. It's just so curious to me.
They are calling him Tampon Tim... SMH
sdskinsfan2001 08-07-2024, 03:35 AM It's definitely an interesting pick to say the least. I feel like if she had picked Shapiro she probably wins somewhat comfortably in November. Especially if she never puts herself in a position where she has answer a question about her past or her plans for the future.
It's probably the worst choice for her chances, right? Does adding him to the ticket entice the moderates or the independents? I don't think so. Those 'lefter' than left are in the bag, though... but they already were. It's just so curious to me.
They are calling him Tampon Tim... SMH
There isn't a more self-loathing group of humans on earth than a liberal jew in the U.S. Shapiro sold out God for his own gain, but didn't actually gain anything, then had to promote Walz in his own home state.
Giantone 08-07-2024, 06:06 AM There isn't a more self-loathing group of humans on earth than a liberal jew in the U.S. Shapiro sold out God for his own gain, but didn't actually gain anything, then had to promote Walz in his own home state.
There it is, , there is the maga we all know!!!!!!!!
Giantone 08-07-2024, 06:19 AM I think they were hoping (praying) she wouldn't go full bore Progressive if she won, but by picking Walz she is demonstrating she is going to go full bore progressive which for those two (and me) killed our long shot hopes. (Plus for one of them he really liked Kelley - he is our Senator).
I liked Kelly I thought he was a good choice but so is this guy
https://news.yahoo.com/4-takeaways-fromtim-walzs-first-campaign-speech-as-kamala-harris-running-mate-003450106.html
To sit out or vote trump becuase Kelly wasn't picked is acting like a petulant little kid. Arizona needs to keep Kelly if for no other reason then to shut up Kerri Lake!
Why Walz?
https://news.yahoo.com/why-did-harris-pick-walz-180127763.html
CRedskinsRule 08-07-2024, 08:03 AM There it is, , there is the maga we all know!!!!!!!!
Can someone explain to me why G1 is allowed to continue to be a member. He constantly stalks certain posters, his posts add zero to any disqussion, and often verges on harassment if not just actual harassment and character assaults. I get that he bashes conservatives so therefore he's got more leeway but unlike Chico, for whom a similar case could be made, G1s not a Washington fan and he doesn't contribute much in the sports side of the forum.
In fact, a strong case can be made that any thread that G1 starts posting in is going to die because nobody wants to interact with him.
Sent from my SM-S711U using Tapatalk
Giantone 08-07-2024, 08:41 AM Can someone explain to me why G1 is allowed to continue to be a member. He constantly stalks certain posters, his posts add zero to any disqussion, and often verges on harassment if not just actual harassment and character assaults. I get that he bashes conservatives so therefore he's got more leeway but unlike Chico, for whom a similar case could be made, G1s not a Washington fan and he doesn't contribute much in the sports side of the forum.
In fact, a strong case can be made that any thread that G1 starts posting in is going to die because nobody wants to interact with him.
Sent from my SM-S711U using Tapatalk
First and Foremost I have always respected the Football forums Giant Fan or Not so let's be clear on that from the start. As for "bashing conservatives" no, Maga, yes! The three posters I interact with have done 10 times worse to me then I have ever done to them. All MTK has to do is tell me, I will do whatever he says . Stalks is a bit of a stretch , go back to the posts when trump was elected and look at the shitt talking going on by the posters you defend. Then look at their made up BS when Biden went in. I give to that poster what I get from that poster. I will end with this say what you want and that is fine but again I have always respected the Washington Team and Fans on this site's Football forums,always.
Giantone 08-07-2024, 08:42 AM Can someone explain to me why G1 is allowed to continue to be a member. He constantly stalks certain posters, his posts add zero to any disqussion, and often verges on harassment if not just actual harassment and character assaults. I get that he bashes conservatives so therefore he's got more leeway but unlike Chico, for whom a similar case could be made, G1s not a Washington fan and he doesn't contribute much in the sports side of the forum.
In fact, a strong case can be made that any thread that G1 starts posting in is going to die because nobody wants to interact with him.
Sent from my SM-S711U using Tapatalk
First and Foremost I have always respected the Football forums Giant Fan or Not so let's be clear on that from the start. As for "bashing conservatives" no, Maga, yes! The three posters I interact with have done 10 times worse to me then I have ever done to them. All MTK has to do is tell me, I will do whatever he says . Stalks is a bit of a stretch , go back to the posts when trump was elected and look at the shitt talking going on by the posters you defend. Then look at their made up BS when Biden went in. I give to that poster what I get from that poster. I will end with this say what you want and that is fine but again I have always respected the Washington Team and Fans on this site's Football forums, always.
CRedskinsRule 08-07-2024, 08:59 AM First and Foremost I have always respected the Football forums Giant Fan or Not so let's be clear on that from the start. As for "bashing conservatives" no, Maga, yes! The three posters I interact with have done 10 times worse to me then I have ever done to them. All MTK has to do is tell me, I will do whatever he says . Stalks is a bit of a stretch , go back to the posts when trump was elected and look at the shitt talking going on by the posters you defend. Then look at their made up BS when Biden went in. I give to that poster what I get from that poster. I will end with this say what you want and that is fine but again I have always respected the Washington Team and Fans on this site's Football forums, always.I really try my hardest not to interact with you but Every thread you start getting involved in dies because you don't know limits and you don't understand back and forth you only understand bashing. You have little if any logical cohesiveness to your arguments and ultimately you just resort to name calling and shutting down the threads.
It makes civil discussion fairly impossible. Are there others who probably could have a similar statement yes. BUT discussions don't come to a screeching halt because of Chico or SD skins or others. They do when you get involved.
Sent from my SM-G781U using Tapatalk
|