|
|
sdskinsfan2001 03-01-2022, 11:05 AM If we sign any of the second rate guys, we absolutely better draft a QB at 11, and no later than round 2.
Very interested to see how Carson Strong's medicals go. He is a stud, if his knee can hold up for 5+ years, I wouldn't mind going BPA at 11 and trading back up into the 1st to get him. Or trade down from 11, get extra picks, and then pick him.
njant 03-01-2022, 12:00 PM go get wilson orwatson
If we sign any of the second rate guys, we absolutely better draft a QB at 11, and no later than round 2.
Very interested to see how Carson Strong's medicals go. He is a stud, if his knee can hold up for 5+ years, I wouldn't mind going BPA at 11 and trading back up into the 1st to get him. Or trade down from 11, get extra picks, and then pick him.
Don't even bother signing a vet like MT if we draft someone like Willis high. You have to get the rookie ready to play right away and devote 90% of the snaps to him in practice.
BaltimoreSkins 03-01-2022, 12:34 PM Don't even bother signing a vet like MT if we draft someone like Willis high. You have to get the rookie ready to play right away and devote 90% of the snaps to him in practice.
Agree if not you get what happened to Justin Fields in Chicago
sdskinsfan2001 03-01-2022, 12:44 PM Don't even bother signing a vet like MT if we draft someone like Willis high. You have to get the rookie ready to play right away and devote 90% of the snaps to him in practice.
My theory has always been the best man plays. Even snaps to start and whoever plays better the 1st day, few days, camp, etc., gets more reps the next time until the other guy starts playing better.
We also need to win football games. If the veteran is playing better and gives us the best chance to win, week 1, he should play. The other guys want to win. The NFL isn't for making rookies feel good.
Edit - the veteran is likely to be signed well before the draft too, I would think.
Ruhskins 03-01-2022, 12:54 PM I hate to say but, if the big three are not available and it is likely the top two QBs won't be available at 11, I would roll with a FA QB, try like hell to trade down and get assets for 2023, and draft a mid-round QB.
To me, the worst case scenario is rolling with TH again.
My theory has always been the best man plays. Even snaps to start and whoever plays better the 1st day, few days, camp, etc., gets more reps the next time until the other guy starts playing better.
We also need to win football games. If the veteran is playing better and gives us the best chance to win, week 1, he should play. The other guys want to win. The NFL isn't for making rookies feel good.
Edit - the veteran is likely to be signed well before the draft too, I would think.
Then you don't take a QB first round. You can't take a QB high and say we're going to let the rookie and a vet battle it out. That's a very poor plan and it will get Ron fired. You go all in with the rookie or you don't take him.
punch it in 03-01-2022, 01:06 PM Then you don't take a QB first round. You can't take a QB high and say we're going to let the rookie and a vet battle it out. That's a very poor plan and it will get Ron fired. You go all in with the rookie or you don't take him.
Totally agree with this because it is year 3. Would have been ok in year 1 or 2 but not now.
I hate to say but, if the big three are not available and it is likely the top two QBs won't be available at 11, I would roll with a FA QB, try like hell to trade down and get assets for 2023, and draft a mid-round QB.
To me, the worst case scenario is rolling with TH again.
Agree, I can't take another year of gentle spirals floating over WR's heads.
punch it in 03-01-2022, 01:23 PM Gentle spirals. Lololol
|