Name Reveal 2.2.22

Get a quarterback and win. That is all. HTTC.

They should have put Summo in charge. He’d have come up with something better in like 5 minutes. Sheesh - disappointing to me. Not a fan of any aspect of this.

I wonder if a new owner would come in and change it all - if ownership changed, of course. Would be rather comical for that to happen on a dime after all this.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

The jerseys suck.

Look did anyone think we were gonna be happy about something Dan fuckin Snyder was in charge of?

But you know what? If they win everything about this will be better. And honestly lets see them in action - maybe will look better than we think? Idk. Idc.
I just want to win. I will never give douche Snyder credit for anything even if we do.

It has already been pointed out that the logo is kind of wrong - it points to the year we won Superbowls, not the season (eg, 1992 instead of 1991). Amateur hour.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

They should have put Summo in charge. He’d have come up with something better in like 5 minutes. Sheesh - disappointing to me. Not a fan of any aspect of this.

I wonder if a new owner would come in and change it all - if ownership changed, of course. Would be rather comical for that to happen on a dime after all this.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I bet there is nine million things that have to come in to consideration when designing the logo.

Its human nature to resist change, yes i wish we could be the Redskins but considering who is in charge this could have been way worst.

Now imagine Watson in this uniform and all the angry melts away.

I am usually negative Nancy but i kind of like all of it and i definitely wear a black Coms jersey with Way/Watson on the back.

I don’t quite agree - I think a change to a better name, logo and unis would have made me excited about this. The only thing I like about the unis is that the face mask is burgundy which is cool. But the rest is pretty boring.

Summo - show us how it’s done, man!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

It has already been pointed out that the logo is kind of wrong - it points to the year we won Superbowls, not the season (eg, 1992 instead of 1991). Amateur hour.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Technically it's correct. It was the 91/92 season, but the game was played in 92, try googling 1992 Super Bowl and see what results come up.

I bet there is nine million things that have to come in to consideration when designing the logo.

Its human nature to resist change, yes i wish we could be the Redskins but considering who is in charge this could have been way worst.

Now imagine Watson in this uniform and all the angry melts away.

I am usually negative Nancy but i kind of like all of it and i definitely wear a black Coms jersey with Way/Watson on the back.

Yes everyone hates change and coming from this owner, people were going to be even more inclined to hate whatever change was coming. Totally understandable.

It has already been pointed out that the logo is kind of wrong - it points to the year we won Superbowls, not the season (eg, 1992 instead of 1991). Amateur hour.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

People just being stupid and over the top picky about shit now. Those were the years they actually won the Super Bowl, so I don't see anything wrong with that at all. If they named the Super Bowls by the actual year, instead of in Roman Numeral order, that is exactly what they would be, just like the Pro Bowls...

The 2022 Pro Bowl is coming up, or should we be calling it the 2021 Pro Bowl, or the post-2021 Pro Bowl? No.