sdskinsfan2001
11-22-2021, 12:39 PM
The little racist motherfucker wouldn’t have been bothered if he lived in DC, and people were rioting, looting, and damaging property there. Neither would most of the people defending him. Because those were white people. White people who had no good reason to be there whatsoever. It didn’t start as something good. It was never something with good intentions. But i hear zero about rioting or looting or a fuckin insurrection of our government from the people who are so concerned about the buildings in Kenosha. Please.
Im not talking about you SD, i know you have a problem with that too. And had some anti trumper marched in there with a gun full vigilante id have a problem with them too.
Saw the 1st part and was about to say whoa now, saw the 2nd part and say...
https://www.snopes.com/tachyon/2019/07/91ApW1z.gif
punch it in
11-22-2021, 12:52 PM
https://media3.giphy.com/media/gVoBC0SuaHStq/giphy.gif
His vested interest is his community not being destroyed for zero reason. None. People were fed up. He had a right to be there.
Stop, you're being ridiculous. Unless he was protecting family or his own private property, a minor with a gun had zero business being there. Bad idea right from the start. And the end result (two dead) proves the point.
Chico23231
11-22-2021, 01:30 PM
Stop, you're being ridiculous. Unless he was protecting family or his own private property, a minor with a gun had zero business being there. Bad idea right from the start. And the end result (two dead) proves the point.
You might think it’s ridiculous, but he had a right just as anyone else to be there. It’s completely unacceptable to think a person has a right to commit violence, burn, loot, and destroy things thinking they can’t be harmed in the process. Kyle would be home if the rioters woulda stayed home.
You understand he was attacked right? And if he wasn’t attacked those 2 convicted violent felons would still be alive.
Justice was served and Kyle rightly was found innocent.
You might think it’s ridiculous, but he had a right just as anyone else to be there. It’s completely unacceptable to think a person has a right to commit violence, burn, loot, and destroy things thinking they can’t be harmed in the process. Kyle would be home if the rioters woulda stayed home.
You understand he was attacked right? And if he wasn’t attacked those 2 convicted violent felons would still be alive.
Justice was served and Kyle rightly was found innocent.
Yes it's ridiculous to me you think it was a good idea for a kid, a minor child, to show up to an already volatile situation with a gun. Absolutely fucking ridiculous. Again, he wasn't protecting family or property. He stuck his nose in where it didn't belong and two people are dead because he's an idiot.
Chico23231
11-22-2021, 01:45 PM
No his community is his business and people in the area were doing their best to defend from violent rioters. He was coordinating with others to defend local businesses that were under threat. Again, he was attacked…he is allowed to be there regardless of your opinion.
Remember the rioters had zero reason to be there, Jacob Blake was justifiable shot. Rioters should have been at home and not living out some bullshit woke riot fantasy attacking property and people.
MTK will have to disagree on this one.
No his community is his business and people in the area were doing their best to defend from violent rioters. He was coordinating with others to defend local businesses that were under threat. Again, he was attacked…he is allowed to be there regardless of your opinion.
Remember the rioters had zero reason to be there, Jacob Blake was justifiable shot. Rioters should have been at home and not living out some bullshit woke riot fantasy attacking property and people.
MTK will have to disagree on this one.
If you had a kid would you let him go into that situation with a gun?
If the rioters had no reason to be there than neither did Rittenhouse. 2 wrongs don't make a right.
nonniey
11-22-2021, 02:04 PM
The entire chain of events leading up to him killing 2 people just blows me away. What parent would drive their kid across state lines with a gun to a place where there is civil unrest? A gun he bought because he thought it looked cool, but he wasn't there looking for trouble? Ok. Have to think this opens up a can of worms for the future. Any idiot with a gun will now feel empowered to show up to a protest to just "help out" and then claim self defense when things get dicey and they decide to start playing Call of Duty for real.
Damn this is a perfect example of people still believing and repeating inaccurate information.
Case in point.
"What parent would drive their kid across state lines with a gun to a place where there is civil unrest?"
SunnySide
11-22-2021, 02:05 PM
https://i.ytimg.com/vi/qsVP0vEgPvY/hqdefault.jpg
nonniey
11-22-2021, 02:18 PM
Inaccurate things I've read or heard (on the radio) on the case since Friday.
1) Ritterhouse killed 3 black men.
2) He chased down and shot his first victim.
3) He was randomly shooting into the crowd.
4) He was a member of a white supremacist militia.
5) His mother drove him to the protest/riot.
6) He transported a gun across state lines.
7) It was illegal for him to have that gun at the riot since he was only 17.
I think it would help everyone if just facts were used when discussing this case.