Fitzmagic Thread

Pages : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 [9] 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27

SkinzWin
03-16-2021, 05:33 PM
Hienicke, Allen, Fitz > Derp Haskins, Allen, Smith

I’ll take it

I see what you did there with putting Heinicke first in QB order. 😉

sdskinsfan2001
03-16-2021, 05:41 PM
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

Hello!!

https://twitter.com/BleacherReport/status/1371664674064719874?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5 Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1371664674064719874%7Ctwgr% 5E%7Ctwcon%5Es1_c10&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fbleacherreport.com%2Fwashing ton-football-team

Chico23231
03-16-2021, 05:42 PM
I see what you did there with putting Heinicke first in QB order. 😉

Ha...good eye! I think Fitz is the starter but interesting that John Clayton and a couple others have mentioned, Skins still in for Darnold of price comes down

Chief X_Phackter
03-16-2021, 05:44 PM
Dianna Russini:

I spoke to a source in Washington about the possibility of the WFT trading with the Jets for QB Sam Darnold.

I was simply told “don’t waste your time”

GridIron26
03-16-2021, 05:47 PM
I think the only way we are still interested in Darnold is if he is available for 3rd day pick.

nonniey
03-16-2021, 06:08 PM
The thing I don't get is I saw someone type Fitz could throw 4td's or 4int's he'll be exciting but then they say NO to Winston. I hope I'm proved wrong. I've always been overly optimistic with this team but I can't be for this. I hope our defense plays lights out.

Well the problem with Winston is he's that type that can throw 4 TDs and/or 6 ints.

Chico23231
03-16-2021, 06:34 PM
Dianna Russini:

I spoke to a source in Washington about the possibility of the WFT trading with the Jets for QB Sam Darnold.

I was simply told “don’t waste your time”

Hopefully this is right, others disagreeing tho

Scalper
03-16-2021, 06:58 PM
Fitzpatrick is a student of the Brett Favruh school of quarterbacking, he's high risk and high reward. You either get 4 td's or 4 int's.

Favre won one SB on stacked teams. He lost countless playoff games with horrible picks. The problem is Fitz isn't as talented as Favre.

NYCskinfan82
03-16-2021, 07:06 PM
Well the problem with Winston is he's that type that can throw 4 TDs and/or 6 ints.

When is the last time Fitz threw for 5,000 yards. Agree they both throw int's.

Scalper
03-16-2021, 07:06 PM
C- grade signing. He is a 38 year old QB with a career losing record and a very low career QB rating. I understand the logic, better than trading draft picks or signing a similar above average but not great QB to a long term deal, and conventional but incorrect thinking is you need a dependable guy to bridge until you find a long-term answer. So we now have two stopgaps on roster, Fitz and Allen, who are NOT long term answers. If we draft a QB and cut Allen, this move looks a lot better, but we should be looking for long-term solutions. If we go into season with Heinecke, Fitz, and Allen at QB that is atrocious as only one QB is potential long term answer. What keeps this grade from being a D or F is that there are very limited options in free agency. Fitz is not leading us to a SB, we should be looking for QBs with potential to be long-term franchise SB winners. The proper move is to draft 1 QB and go with Heinecke, Allen, rookie, or ideally 2 rookies and Heinecke, and use $10M to resign Allen and others long term. Is our goal to win the participation trophy of an early playoff exit, or find a franchise QB that can win the big one? This is the problem with coach as GM, short term thinking. This is NOT the move Smith would have made if still GM. He would have drafted QBs.

So we have now spent $28M on Scherff and Fitz, while Allen isn't extended. F-ing brilliant. A competent FO would have locked up Allen first.

The single most important thing a GM or FO can do is get QB right. Our FO has not as of yet. We also read that Fitz is now the de facto starter. Sure there will be competition, but we need to be favoring younger players who could be long-term answer. I would much rather go 7-9 with Heinecke and know he isn't the answer, or go 7-9 with Heinecke and know he is the answer, than waste a year with a 38 year old QB who has never won a SB and is never going to win one for us. What may happen is that we start Fitz and never get a good enough look at Heinecke to see if he is the future, meaning next year we're right back in the exact same spot. This is a case study in why you don't give coach GM powers. All we are doing is sacrificing long-term for the short. It would actually be smarter to start Heinecke all year and if he isn't the answer you draft top 5 and get a franchise QB.

EZ Archive Ads Plugin for vBulletin Copyright 2006 Computer Help Forum