Fitzmagic Thread

Lol love the internet


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

If Heinicke is the guy then he will beat out Fitz. If he can't beat out Fitz then he clearly isn't the guy.

Also we still may be in play for drafting someone. I think this move just adds another durable guy w/ experience who can be a backup or starter. Obviously he isn't the long term solution.

The off season isn't over yet as we will see what happens in the draft.

Really not sure why anyone dislikes this move.

Concur on competition. Hope so on drafting. It is a decent amount of money that could be spent better elsewhere that does nothing to address the long term need at the position. Did you see the Packers signing stopgaps after Favre retired? No, they drafted until they found their guy. As observed in original post, we should be adding players with long-term potential. When you look at long term potential at the position, we may have the worst QB situation in the NFL. The proper approach would have been to not sign Fitz and draft 1-2 QBs and let them compete.

I must admit my first reaction was to vote "meh", didn't hate it but wasn't that impressed either, but now am coming around to it a bit. I didn't like the interceptions he makes but in hindsite that is because he is pushing the ball further down the field.... Alex Smith on the other hand hardly ever threw interceptions because he wouldn't push the ball downfield. With AS in there I had little confidence that WFT could mount a scoring drive when it was really required. Whether you don't like his age or reputation I don't think you can argue that Fitzgerald isn't better than the QBs we have lined up for the last two years, I think WFT would have had a winning record last year if he was playing

Funny meme alert 👇🏻 IDK why but I can’t ever get an image from the internet to show up in this forum correctly.

https://ibb.co/svQNgQT

Has Fitz ever played on Christmas Eve? Kudos to him for doing that AND getting around all those houses later the same night.

Concur on competition. Hope so on drafting. It is a decent amount of money that could be spent better elsewhere that does nothing to address the long term need at the position. Did you see the Packers signing stopgaps after Favre retired? No, they drafted until they found their guy. As observed in original post, we should be adding players with long-term potential. When you look at long term potential at the position, we may have the worst QB situation in the NFL. The proper approach would have been to not sign Fitz and draft 1-2 QBs and let them compete.

Err, the Packers already had Rodgers on the roster before Favre retired?

Not thinking about the Jests are you? I mean, it's not like their QB search has gone any better than ours since then...

Has Fitz ever played on Christmas Eve? Kudos to him for doing that AND getting around all those houses later the same night.



Dude gets no love and does so much not only for fans but children around the world. Smfh.

Favre won one SB on stacked teams. He lost countless playoff games with horrible picks. The problem is Fitz isn't as talented as Favre.

Who is saying he is?

Alls I'm saying is Fitzpatrick is inconsistent, he's gonna have games where he looks really good, and games where he looks really bad. It's been the trend his entire career.

Fitz is the best QB we've had since Kirk, is he great? Hell no but he's way better than Haskins, Keenum , Smith etc were.

Smith is a better game manager of course but he's not the passer Fitz is.

He's like a Romo, he will make some boneheaded plays and he'll make some crazy fun plays, with our defense you can take chances like that. He was actually going to retire but wanted to play for a good team so that says alot about his goals in DC

I had my rant yesterday in regards to Fitz, new day i've moved on i support the WFT i'm now on board in RR we trust.

Well... he will probably be the most interesting if not flamboyant QB we've had since Billy Kilmer.

The potential downsides seem minimal. A good provisional get.