WFT Quarterback Thread - Post SEASON 2021


AnonEmouse
01-18-2021, 07:37 PM
RG3 is available again.

Hmm, nah.

Warthog
01-19-2021, 10:28 AM
So are most of you saying Stafford over Watson? Watson is younger and has more upside. Getting either QB jets us into 10+ games won per season. Our defense went from the cellar in 2019 to a #4 rated defense this year. We can move even HIGHER with the addition of a couple of FA this off-season (LB, DB) and resign Allen and Payne. Sweat & Young will be even better next year!

It’s the offense that needs to improve. We draft heavily for the left side of the OL (OT, OG); we bring on a very good or better FA - WR burner to play oppose MacLaurin. We hire a FA TE. With WATSON or STAFFORD this offense goes from the bottom into the top 10 instantly.

We offer our #1 this season AND the #1 AND #2 next year. It’s going to take that much to get either of these elite QB. We also have Heinicke as a GREAT backup QB.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

AnonEmouse
01-19-2021, 12:54 PM
If the Dolphins want to pull the trigger on the suggested trade of picks plus Tua, they have greater capitol, as do other teams closer to the #1 pick. I have to think that we'd have to offer more than 2 1's and a 2, not least because our draft position would likely be worse than 19th next year too.

Ruhskins
01-19-2021, 01:02 PM
So are most of you saying Stafford over Watson? Watson is younger and has more upside. Getting either QB jets us into 10+ games won per season. Our defense went from the cellar in 2019 to a #4 rated defense this year. We can move even HIGHER with the addition of a couple of FA this off-season (LB, DB) and resign Allen and Payne. Sweat & Young will be even better next year!

It’s the offense that needs to improve. We draft heavily for the left side of the OL (OT, OG); we bring on a very good or better FA - WR burner to play oppose MacLaurin. We hire a FA TE. With WATSON or STAFFORD this offense goes from the bottom into the top 10 instantly.

We offer our #1 this season AND the #1 AND #2 next year. It’s going to take that much to get either of these elite QB. We also have Heinicke as a GREAT backup QB.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I think Stafford is the QB that is more likely to be available. Who knows what will happen with Watson.

Chico23231
01-19-2021, 01:12 PM
Watson isn’t coming here available if not. We can’t put together an attractive enough package versus Miami or Jets. Also think teams like San Fran or Carolina would put together better deals.

MTK
01-19-2021, 01:14 PM
So are most of you saying Stafford over Watson? Watson is younger and has more upside. Getting either QB jets us into 10+ games won per season. Our defense went from the cellar in 2019 to a #4 rated defense this year. We can move even HIGHER with the addition of a couple of FA this off-season (LB, DB) and resign Allen and Payne. Sweat & Young will be even better next year!

It’s the offense that needs to improve. We draft heavily for the left side of the OL (OT, OG); we bring on a very good or better FA - WR burner to play oppose MacLaurin. We hire a FA TE. With WATSON or STAFFORD this offense goes from the bottom into the top 10 instantly.

We offer our #1 this season AND the #1 AND #2 next year. It’s going to take that much to get either of these elite QB. We also have Heinicke as a GREAT backup QB.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I think most are saying Stafford because it's a more realistic scenario.

AnonEmouse
01-19-2021, 01:18 PM
I'd say Stafford because he costs us lest than Watson. Much less.

mredskins
01-19-2021, 01:37 PM
RG III released, problem solved. Backup the Brinks.

CRedskinsRule
01-19-2021, 01:41 PM
RG III released, problem solved. Backup the Brinks.

I believe this comment is a bannable offense

Ruhskins
01-19-2021, 01:43 PM
I believe this comment is a bannable offense

I second this motion.

EZ Archive Ads Plugin for vBulletin Copyright 2006 Computer Help Forum