MTK
04-24-2020, 07:56 AM
Rodgers could play another 3, 4 or even 5 years. Don't see how that pick makes any sense.
NFL Draft Round 1 ThreadMTK 04-24-2020, 07:56 AM Rodgers could play another 3, 4 or even 5 years. Don't see how that pick makes any sense. SkinzWin 04-24-2020, 08:00 AM Not with this offense man, other than Terry, who helps Dwayne?? Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk Michael Pittman Jr Chico23231 04-24-2020, 08:00 AM Dallas ia absolutely loaded Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk I agree on offense, they have a top 5 unit in talent in the league with or without lamb. They are bottom third on the defense side tho and I’m pretty damn happy they didn’t get the DL from South Carolina or the pass rusher from LSU. The Eagles though...man the guy they wanted was Ruggs. He was no1 WR on their board. Eagles would have taken Lamb or Jeudy. They reached big time. Chico23231 04-24-2020, 08:05 AM Rodgers could play another 3, 4 or even 5 years. Don't see how that pick makes any sense. Agree they need help everywhere on offense. Oline, WR, RB, TE...why not for once help Rodgers? The front office has done a fuckin terrible job surrounding him with talent. Look at Dallas...they know Dak isn’t a top ten QB, but they have gone out of there way to give him help MTK 04-24-2020, 08:10 AM Agree they need help everywhere on offense. Oline, WR, RB, TE...why not for once help Rodgers? The front office has done a fuckin terrible job surrounding him with talent. Look at Dallas...they know Dak isn’t a top ten QB, but they have gone out of there way to give him help Seriously, get the guy a WR or one of the top TE's skinsfan69 04-24-2020, 08:21 AM Rodgers could play another 3, 4 or even 5 years. Don't see how that pick makes any sense. In the championship game AR just looked like he didn't want to be there. Not motivating his teammates, just about as aloof as it gets. Just a guess but I believe the Packers felt like after that ( plus he's 36) they needed to have a replacement plan in place. The top organizations always draft QB's. What if GB decided to pass on AR when they had Farve? They definitely wouldn't have someone playing that's better than he is. skinsfan69 04-24-2020, 08:24 AM Not sure I can take another night of the ESPN nonsense. That was brutal last night. MTK 04-24-2020, 08:27 AM In the championship game AR just looked like he didn't want to be there. Not motivating his teammates, just about as aloof as it gets. Just a guess but I believe the Packers felt like after that ( plus he's 36) they needed to have a replacement plan in place. The top organizations always draft QB's. What if GB decided to pass on AR when they had Farve? They definitely wouldn't have someone playing that's better than he is. Difference is when they took Rodgers Favre was already talking about retirement so they had to act... this makes no sense Chico23231 04-24-2020, 08:33 AM Not sure I can take another night of the ESPN nonsense. That was brutal last night. ESPN is unwatchable. I don't know who thought that was a good idea...too many people. I watched ABC(?)...I believe that who broadcast nationally. OnceWeWereKings 04-24-2020, 08:44 AM Difference is when they took Rodgers Favre was already talking about retirement so they had to act... this makes no sense Maybe that's just who they had as the best available at the time...dont we always talk about how good teams draft bpa, and bad teams draft for need? Just spitballin here. Oe possibly theres other issues with ar that only people behind the scenes know. Iono | |
EZ Archive Ads Plugin for vBulletin Copyright 2006 Computer Help Forum