|
|
skinsfan69 11-19-2019, 10:51 AM The best way to get better quickly is the QB. Put Mahomes on the Redskins and he could take this POS, trash, garbage, unmotivated, sloppy ass team and they'd win 7 or 8 games. Or at least we'd be in every game. A d-linemen can't do that. A LT can't do that.
Look at Murray? If you put Rosen back on that team they're not even competitive. Plug in Murray and they're taking one of the best teams in the league to OT. That isn't a real good team and they're in just about every game cause of him.
A real tough decision needs to be made going into the draft next year.
skinsfan69 11-19-2019, 10:52 AM Trade the Bengals Haskins, Trent Williams, and whatever else they want to get Burrow.
No one is going to make that trade. You're in fantasy land.
BigHairedAristocrat 11-19-2019, 11:06 AM No one is going to make that trade. You're in fantasy land.
So the Bengals would not take a 2019 first round QB, elite LT, and something else, such as additional picks, to trade down one spot, where they could get Chase Young?
While I agree Haskins and Williams both being part of the deal would be unlikely, I do think there is a package of players or picks that could motivate the Bengals to trade down one spot - especially since they can still grab an elite player at 2.
BigHairedAristocrat 11-19-2019, 11:08 AM The best way to get better quickly is the QB. Put Mahomes on the Redskins and he could take this POS, trash, garbage, unmotivated, sloppy ass team and they'd win 7 or 8 games. Or at least we'd be in every game. A d-linemen can't do that. A LT can't do that.
Look at Murray? If you put Rosen back on that team they're not even competitive. Plug in Murray and they're taking one of the best teams in the league to OT. That isn't a real good team and they're in just about every game cause of him.
A real tough decision needs to be made going into the draft next year.
I don't think it would be a tough decision to draft BPA, especially if that player is a QB.
skinsfan69 11-19-2019, 11:48 AM So the Bengals would not take a 2019 first round QB, elite LT, and something else, such as additional picks, to trade down one spot, where they could get Chase Young?
While I agree Haskins and Williams both being part of the deal would be unlikely, I do think there is a package of players or picks that could motivate the Bengals to trade down one spot - especially since they can still grab an elite player at 2.
The Redskins aren't trading Haskins cause they're not going to admit failure after one year. The Bengals aren't trading for Haskins cause the more he plays the more his value goes down. He was obviously overdrafted.
As far as Trent is concerned the only teams that are going to most likely interested are contending, win now type of teams, not a team in full rebuild.
Chico23231 11-19-2019, 12:06 PM Snyder isn’t gonna trade Haskins. Nobody is gonna tell him he was wrong about Haskins this early
Number44 11-19-2019, 12:27 PM There is a chance now that Tua decides not to come out. If he stays at Alabama, he's got a good shot at being #1 the following year, and getting a much bigger contract than he is likely to see if he enters the draft this year due to the injury. Go BPA and if Haskins doesn't pan out, perhaps we get the overall #1 in 2021 and grab Tua.
I still like the idea of possibly trading down from 1.1 or 1.2 to 1.3 or 1.4 if a team has the hots for Young, Burrows, or maybe even Herbert. Maybe we get a 2nd rounder and still draft Thomas at 1.3 or 1.4.
sdskinsfan2001 11-19-2019, 01:05 PM Offense:
WR: McLaurin
WR: Harmon
Slot: Sims or Quinn
LT: New Starter Needed
RT: Re-sign Flowers (or new starter needed if we don't)
C: New Starter Needed
RG: New Starter Needed (Scherff has been terrible, not paying him 13 million)
RT: New Starter Needed (Moses is a bum and I think he brings the team down)
TE: New Starter Needed (and also another TE to go with Sprinkle as backups)
RB: Guice (Hopefully Love as 3rd down back)
QB: Haskins
Defense:
CB: Dunbar
SS: Collins
FS: New Starter Needed
CB: New Starter Needed
OLB: Sweat
ILB: New Starter Needed or Foster if healthy (keep 2 of the current guys as backups)
ILB: New Starter Needed (Don't think any of our ILBs are quality starters)
OLB: Kerrigan (although I would think about cutting him, especially if we draft Young)
DE: Payne
NT: Ioannidis
DE: Allen
I count 9 new starters needed in an ideal world, and possibly 10 if we cut Kerrigan. Not realistic to replace 9 guys usually, so a few of the guys I think should be replaced will still be here.
skinsfaninok 11-19-2019, 01:15 PM Joe Burrow is having an incredible season, I've been on his bandwagon since week 1 but he's not the answer to our issues, Haskins also had 3 Big time throws while having 0 turnover worthy throws Sunday, meaning he put the ball in tight windows as accurate as u can. The Int was on Quinn no Haskins.
Why are u guys already giving up on him? Because we are losing? Sorry but Mahomes wouldn't be that great in DC, we don't have his OL and WR/TE talent
Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
BigHairedAristocrat 11-19-2019, 02:02 PM The Redskins aren't trading Haskins cause they're not going to admit failure after one year. The Bengals aren't trading for Haskins cause the more he plays the more his value goes down. He was obviously overdrafted.
As far as Trent is concerned the only teams that are going to most likely interested are contending, win now type of teams, not a team in full rebuild.
This statement presumes Bruce is still here next year. I genuinely believe he gets fired, or at least moved to a role outside of football ops. I think Snyder goes after a big name and that big name is going to insist on total control as a condition of accepting the job.
Meaning all bets are off. And from the Bengals side, they would be fools not to consider offers to trade down one spot. They're in a rebuild mode, so they need all the help they can get.
|