Democratic Primary Push for White House

I believe that is a moot point. You have to be 35 to be president of the USA, she is only 30, so that has to disqualify her as a VP candidate, I would think. Correct me if I am wrong.I didn't know she is only 30

Sent from my SM-G973U using Tapatalk

Can u believe Pete is winning? I was told by Bernie bros...this could be a win by 10%.

Not a good start for Biden.

I’m a Klobuchar fan...I like Gabbard too, mostly because she a spitfire smoke show and she sued Hillary.

I actually can based on what I was hearing. Very pragmatic probably the most moderate/conservative of all candidates. Former military guy. Not sure if America will elect a gay man. I really love me some Gabbard, military vet, reaches across the aisle, progressive, plus she values sustainability which priority one for me got to stop passing the buck to the next generation part of the reason we are in this deficit mess.

yes!!! been waiting for it.

NBC news has now linked Trump to the Iowa caucus debacle...

https://www.nbcnews.com/tech/security/clog-lines-iowa-caucus-hotline-posted-online-encouragement-disrupt-results-n1131521


LOL, and here comes Shelia!

Democratic Rep. Sheila Jackson Lee of Texas suggested Wednesday that the Russians were behind the vote-reporting app crashing during Monday’s Iowa Democratic caucuses.

https://thefederalist.com/2020/02/06/democrat-congresswoman-blames-iowa-caucus-disaster-on-russia/

Lol the Iowa conspiracy theorist out in full force today. What a complete shit show that keeps getting better.

https://mobile.twitter.com/ChuckRossDC/status/1225661051506585602

Rachel Maddow pushing conspiracy theory and disinformation that 4chan to blame...amazing.

So you dont think 4chan didnt repeatedly post the DNC number and encourage members to call in?

You dont think people called in to clog the lines?

Are you saying the above 2 things didnt happen? We could argue that DNC should have been prepared, tactics like that are par for the course nowadays etc ... but are you saying these 2 things above did not happen and is being completely made up?

Its not a big deal to me, we could argue about the scale or effectiveness .. but are you saying this is all completely made up? That 4cahn didnt post the number repeatedly, didnt encourage people to call in and that no one called in to clog the lines?

Just trying to see where the line is at. I personally dont think it is a big deal and should be expected nowadays. But im sure 4chan did do it and im sure its members did call in.

So you dont think 4chan didnt repeatedly post the DNC number and encourage members to call in?

You dont think people called in to clog the lines?

Are you saying the above 2 things didnt happen? We could argue that DNC should have been prepared, tactics like that are par for the course nowadays etc ... but are you saying these 2 things above did not happen and is being completely made up?

Its not a big deal to me, we could argue about the scale or effectiveness .. but are you saying this is all completely made up? That 4cahn didnt post the number repeatedly, didnt encourage people to call in and that no one called in to clog the lines?

Just trying to see where the line is at. I personally dont think it is a big deal and should be expected nowadays. But im sure 4chan did do it and im sure its members did call in.

First and foremost from an operations perspective you better expect high volume if there is a major issue like a tech...and they ran into it. So you didn't inspect therefore you failed. So you weren't prepared "in case of an emergency"...contingency plan? business continuity? Laughable and 1000% unacceptable from the DNC.

Second, this conspiracy theory of clogged lines was reported with no facts. No evidence of outside interference. Per the Bloomberg fake news "It is unclear how many prank calls the hotline received or how much they contributed to the delays". In others word, zero facts or evidence to base a report on.

3rd, the phone number could be found on google. So its public knowledge and there wasn't a nefarious act which sought to uncover the number for the purpose of sabotage.

4th, From people investigate what amounts to a thread on a message board, people looking stated out of the 2000 post thread, there were ONLY 3 post which made reference to prank this number.


To put this all on trump and trump supporters...its laughable, conspiracy theory bullshit. DNC fuck this up from day 1

First and foremost from an operations perspective you better expect high volume if there is a major issue like a tech...and they ran into it. So you didn't inspect therefore you failed. So you weren't prepared "in case of an emergency"...contingency plan? business continuity? Laughable and 1000% unacceptable from the DNC.

Second, this conspiracy theory of clogged lines was reported with no facts. No evidence of outside interference. Per the Bloomberg fake news "It is unclear how many prank calls the hotline received or how much they contributed to the delays". In others word, zero facts or evidence to base a report on.

3rd, the phone number could be found on google. So its public knowledge and there wasn't a nefarious act which sought to uncover the number for the purpose of sabotage.

4th, From people investigate what amounts to a thread on a message board, people looking stated out of the 2000 post thread, there were ONLY 3 post which made reference to prank this number.


To put this all on trump and trump supporters...its laughable, conspiracy theory bullshit. DNC fuck this up from day 1

I agree, the number was easily found on google, I agree that there should be back up plans to the back up plans.

Sounds like we also agree - 4chan did post the number and urge people to clog the lines, people did call with the intent of clogging the lines.

Up for debate is how many people actually called and what, if any, effect it had on the lines. So its not a "conspiracy theory" as we agree it happened but the debate is how much of an impact, if any, it had.

Bridging the divide .. cheers.

Lol yeah agreeing the phone number was posted on 4chan is not the same as saying folks clogged up phones line which is the conspiracy theory claim. Pushing a false narrative is a specialty by the left. Next I’m sure Susan Rice will be pushed out onto the Sunday news shows ala Benghazi event to tell the American public this happened because of a YouTube video.

Maybe you also agree with dem congresswoman Sheila Jackson that the Russians were behind the app going down.

Lol yeah agreeing the phone number was posted on 4chan is not the same as saying folks clogged up phones line which is the conspiracy theory claim. Pushing a false narrative is a specialty by the left. Next I’m sure Susan Rice will be pushed out onto the Sunday news shows ala Benghazi event to tell the American public this happened because of a YouTube video.

Maybe you also agree with dem congresswoman Sheila Jackson that the Russians were behind the app going down.

ya see man .. I was trying to find the small things we could at least agree on and then perhaps work our way from there. Honestly, I dont know what "benghazi" has to do with this.

We agree 4chan did it.

We agree we dont know the extent of it.

We agree the DNC should have been better prepared.

ya see man .. I was trying to find the small things we could at least agree on and then perhaps work our way from there. Honestly, I dont know what "benghazi" has to do with this.

We agree 4chan did it.

We agree we dont know the extent of it.

We agree the DNC should have been better prepared.

It really is hard to find those small points of agreement. I didn't look into any of it, so I will happily agree and move on.

I am far more interested to see how the Democratic Party resolves the moderate vs socialist split. Seems like a 3 way race at this point, Socialist Bernie vs Pete the Moderate vs Bloomberg the rich. I think Pete has the best chance to win the general election, but will the whole party back him.