Trent Williams holding out for new deal


Pervis_Griffith
06-04-2019, 06:17 PM
Don't trade him ... but don't pay him either.

He has two years left on his contract. Make him honor it. At least one year of it.

Scherff is more of a priority right now.

itvnetop
06-04-2019, 06:26 PM
Trent may miss a few games a season, but he also plays when he’s not even close to healthy (moreso than playing with the normal dings that come with pro football). A 70 percent Trent is still better than most left tackles. Dude doesn’t give up sacks and he’s running down field and pancaking defenders on runs. Plus he can swing inside in a pinch. Trent is the best player we have on the team. Linemen can often perform at high levels longer than other position players. He’s timed the demand perfectly in his favor.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Chico23231
06-04-2019, 06:32 PM
Don't trade him ... but don't pay him either.

He has two years left on his contract. Make him honor it. At least one year of it.

Scherff is more of a priority right now.

This is exactly how I’m feeling.

skinsfan69
06-04-2019, 06:39 PM
Trent looked at Flowers as backup and saw $$$$$

Sent from my SM-G973U using Tapatalk

Not only that but Ty is gone and knows there's literally nothing behind him. Christian didn't show much last year and we're going to be playing a rookie QB. Trent holds all the cards if you ask me.

skinsfan69
06-04-2019, 07:08 PM
You aren't going to get back to you what he's worth to your team currently. Nobody is giving up much for an oft injured LT, who's 30 years of age. You'd be lucky as hell to get a 3rd rounder for him at this point.

True.

DYoungJelly
06-04-2019, 07:53 PM
I would put out trade offers and see what we can get for him. We need to start doing business like the Patriots. He has two years left on his deal, he's 30 and never healthy. I'm fine w/moving on from him a year early over a year too late. It sucks but it's business.Agree 100.

Love him but the league is a business.

Sent from my SM-G920V using Tapatalk

mooby
06-04-2019, 07:54 PM
You know what they say, the best ability is availability. I'm not sure that statement completely applies when you're talking about a player of his caliber, and what he brings to the field when he is available, but he's missed something like 13 or 14 games in the last 3 years. Couple that with the fact that hes 31, I do think they have to be careful about how much they pay him, if they do give him a new contract. It does suck though, because where does that leave us if they can't get it done, with Erick Flowers? He has some leverage here, just hope it doesn't put the team in a bind... I suppose it could cause them to rethink the idea of releasing Norman...

This is the best argument I've ever seen in favor of paying Trent lol.

Aside from that, he's a team leader, he's always worked hard, and played through injury, and is amongst the best at his position. It's easy to see pay the man, but I'd give him a new contract with an out clause after 3 or so years because we know we're not getting 16 games a year out of him anymore.

DYoungJelly
06-04-2019, 08:15 PM
There is only one analysis that matters when deciding to pay him top money.

How many games do we win this year with him, without him?

(If you respond, please give the number of games you think he plays as well.)

Sent from my SM-G920V using Tapatalk

Meks
06-04-2019, 08:52 PM
If they can make the numbers work I'm all for paying him. He's a top LT. Anyone who says otherwise is a moron. But if there's a legit trade offer you'd have to consider it.

What would you consider a legit offer? I would hate to see him go, but like you said the numbers have to be right, or the offer has to be right.

Meks
06-04-2019, 08:53 PM
It's a smart time for him to do this with the investment the team just made that they expect him to protect for another 3-4 years....

EZ Archive Ads Plugin for vBulletin Copyright 2006 Computer Help Forum