skinsfaninok
04-03-2019, 11:47 AM
I still believe a trade for a WR could be in play as well. I'd give up a 3rd for AJ Green
With the 15th Pick, the Redskins select...skinsfaninok 04-03-2019, 11:47 AM I still believe a trade for a WR could be in play as well. I'd give up a 3rd for AJ Green los panda 04-03-2019, 12:15 PM I still believe a trade for a WR could be in play as well. I'd give up a 3rd for AJ Green Toe injuries put the fear in me, hopefully he bounces back this year. skinsfaninok 04-03-2019, 12:16 PM Toe injuries put the fear in me, hopefully he bounces back this year. I agree but man he's a great weapon when healthy Irrefutable 04-03-2019, 01:58 PM Green has a $12-15 million dollar cap hit and is a 2020 free agent calia 04-08-2019, 05:03 PM Green has a $12-15 million dollar cap hit and is a 2020 free agent In other words, just the kind of signing we expect from BA. kct1975 04-10-2019, 09:59 AM Daniel Jones QB - redskins reach because Haskins, Murray and Lock are gone. If Lock is not gone then the'll take him. If all 4 are gone then D.K. Metcalf Ole Miss - WR or LB Devin White, LSUI agree with picking Daniel Jones. The Redskins need a young quarterback, and personally I don't want to trade for Josh Rosen. The article below lists some good points as to the reasons why Daniel Jones would be a good fit with the Redskins, and I generally agree with all of them. https://clutchpoints.com/3-reasons-duke-qb-daniel-jones-is-the-perfect-target-for-the-washington-redskins/amp/https://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/20190410/2a42a39a112e705df83668b3ca7db6a6.jpghttps://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/20190410/7e89a13a6c2bdd655f180e6b97a8681d.jpg Sent from my SM-N920P using Tapatalk kct1975 04-10-2019, 10:04 AM Let's draft a new owner [emoji16][emoji115] [emoji115] [emoji115] [emoji115] This! https://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/20190410/046c834d9bc920ff9aa8e52cf2c1ebba.jpg Sent from my SM-N920P using Tapatalk MTK 04-10-2019, 10:18 AM Definitely not a fan of Jones at 1.15 Schneed10 04-10-2019, 10:25 AM Definitely not a fan of Jones at 1.15 I am intrigued enough to be both excited and nervous if they selected him at 15. Pros: big, pretty athletic, played in a pro style offense, showed an ability to read defenses, and the biggest pro of all he throws with anticipation which is critical in Gruden's timing-based scheme. Con, and it's a big one: not a very quick release. Quick release is important if you're trying to throw to a spot where the WR isn't yet, but headed to. Slower release means the DB sees it and may have time to beat the WR to the spot. It reduces your ability to run after the catch, so receivers catch and get hit right away more frequently. He had only 59% completion at Duke but you can easily chalk that up to supporting cast, I don't perceive there to be big inaccuracy issues. But the quick release thing is an issue. Cousins succeeded with Gruden, at least to some degree, because he a) knew the offense, b) could read a defense, c) threw with anticipation and d) got rid of the ball with a release quick enough to keep the DB from jumping the routes. I think Jones will give you a, b and c, but I'm not sure he gives you enough of d. If he can, then he becomes a very intriguing player to me. BigHairedAristocrat 04-10-2019, 10:29 AM I am intrigued enough to be both excited and nervous if they selected him at 15. Pros: big, pretty athletic, played in a pro style offense, showed an ability to read defenses, and the biggest pro of all he throws with anticipation which is critical in Gruden's timing-based scheme. Con, and it's a big one: not a very quick release. Quick release is important if you're trying to throw to a spot where the WR isn't yet, but headed to. Slower release means the DB sees it and may have time to beat the WR to the spot. It reduces your ability to run after the catch, so receivers catch and get hit right away more frequently. He had only 59% completion at Duke but you can easily chalk that up to supporting cast, I don't perceive there to be big inaccuracy issues. But the quick release thing is an issue. Cousins succeeded with Gruden, at least to some degree, because he a) knew the offense, b) could read a defense, c) threw with anticipation and d) got rid of the ball with a release quick enough to keep the DB from jumping the routes. I think Jones will give you a, b and c, but I'm not sure he gives you enough of d. If he can, then he becomes a very intriguing player to me. so, to summarize, you're saying you can't get enough of Daniel Jones' D? |
|
EZ Archive Ads Plugin for vBulletin Copyright 2006 Computer Help Forum