Offseason starts now: A Redskins players thread

Pages : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 [8] 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26

skinsfan69
01-03-2019, 08:39 AM
Mason Foster is a bum. How is he still in the league? He can't get off blocks, can't cover anyone and is slow. To me he's not even a backup. I would have rather kept Spaight. Not really impressed w/ Dion Hamilton either. He played like shit against the Eagles.

We don't have the LB's to run a 3-4. I'd rather have our d-line getting up field and attacking. Let them be the playmakers of the defense.

BigHairedAristocrat
01-03-2019, 10:07 AM
Charges dropped against Reuben foster

http://m.tmz.com/#!2019/01/03/reuben-foster-domestic-violence-charge-dropped/


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

dmek25
01-03-2019, 10:19 AM
im with skinsfan69 here. lets go back to a base 4-3. thats the strength of our team right now. and neither smith or kerrigan can cover me. and im 57

GridIron26
01-03-2019, 10:22 AM
https://247sports.com/nfl/washington-redskins/Article/Redskins-reserve-future-contracts--127207513/

I remember saw an article stating that we also signed Marquis Flowers to future contract, I can't find the article.

TheMalcolmConnection
01-03-2019, 10:26 AM
1.75M per OTC. If a new DC comes in and Jay thinks he can handle it, I'd keep Mason. Again, assuming there's a new DC that can bring the better out of him, which IMO is a valuable smart and tough vet. If Manusky stays MF obviously needs to be gone, but in that scenario I don't see anybody on that D playing to their full potential.

Honestly, I'll take ANY proven DC right now. We keep doing this in-house bullshit and it's making me bananas. Bowles is RIGHT there for the taking.

KI Skins Fan
01-03-2019, 11:09 AM
Mason Foster was so bad that he led the team in tackles - and the player with the next highest number of tackles wasn't even close. So let's just throw out all that production and replace him with someone with "potential" since Jay Gruden likes potential so much [sarcasm].

skinsfan69
01-03-2019, 11:17 AM
Mason Foster was so bad that he led the team in tackles - and the player with the next highest number of tackles wasn't even close. So let's just throw out all that production and replace him with someone with "potential" since Jay Gruden likes potential so much [sarcasm].

This is a classic case of stats being misleading. Just watch the last game and tell me if you think he is a starter. He is so damn slow.

TheMalcolmConnection
01-03-2019, 11:26 AM
This is a classic case of stats being misleading. Just watch the last game and tell me if you think he is a starter. He is so damn slow.

He's not fast, but I put 99% of the blame on Manusky's schemes. He's so worried of getting beat deep, the LBs and DBs play off a billion yards.

KI Skins Fan
01-03-2019, 11:39 AM
This is a classic case of stats being misleading. Just watch the last game and tell me if you think he is a starter. He is so damn slow.


Why do you heap abuse on a player who was productive and available (16 games) rather than point out the real liabilities on the team, specifically players with little or no production and/or availability?

You're not the only one. People here are constantly on Ryan Kerrigan's case because he's only an excellent player when he supposedly should be great player, I guess. Every year we get 16 games worth of very good play from Ryan. Hell, if everyone on the team played their positions as well as he plays his, we'd win the Super Bowl.

We don't need to eliminate productive and available players, we need to get rid of the real turds - you know, the ones who are said to have potential year after year after year but never deliver results and those who can't stay well enough to get on the field.

We also need coaches who know how to best use their players.

FrenchSkin
01-03-2019, 11:44 AM
Mason Foster was so bad that he led the team in tackles - and the player with the next highest number of tackles wasn't even close. So let's just throw out all that production and replace him with someone with "potential" since Jay Gruden likes potential so much [sarcasm].Yeah Mason Foster is quite underrated but he has his share of responsibility in it: he's slow, there's no arguing that, but when he plays well he makes up for his lack of speed, he's smart enough to be a really good covering LB, and he's a solid tackler.
And of course there's Mason on a bad day who's just slow, out of position and scared to make any decision.
I don't think we have another player displaying such different levels of play game to game.

Envoyé de mon SM-J320FN en utilisant Tapatalk

EZ Archive Ads Plugin for vBulletin Copyright 2006 Computer Help Forum