Week 15 around the NFL

NFL salary cap for 2019 projected at $187M-$191.1M (http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap3000000998860/article/nfl-salary-cap-for-2019-projected-at-187m1911m)

Good news for us

When I saw that it made me feel better about the dead cap they will have next year. Still will be a dumpster fire tho.

When I saw that it made me feel better about the dead cap they will have next year. Still will be a dumpster fire tho.

New GM, New Coach, New Year.

Stay positive.

Wentz out this week per espn

New GM, New Coach, New Year.

Stay positive.

I won't believe New GM until it is announced. The time frame to get a GM in place is now, so the coaching search starts the day the season ends. At this point, even I was an Allen supporter, it is a shame he isn't gone. It only slows the whole process down if the end result is him leaving anyways.

I won't believe New GM until it is announced. The time frame to get a GM in place is now, so the coaching search starts the day the season ends. At this point, even I was an Allen supporter, it is a shame he isn't gone. It only slows the whole process down if the end result is him leaving anyways.

Good point. As long as people like Allen are part of this franchise, we will never win anything.

I'd damn near give the Raiders a 4th 1st round pick to take Bruce.

Snyder better wake the fuck up.

https://twitter.com/DP_NFL/status/1073237342369013761

Watch this shit...

Proves Stephen A is nothing more than a talking head for ratings. If this was any other "Analysts" they would be fired.

He literally knows nothing about the game tonight or the teams involved.

https://twitter.com/DP_NFL/status/1073237342369013761

Watch this shit...

Proves Stephen A is nothing more than a talking head for ratings. If this was any other "Analysts" they would be fired.

He literally knows nothing about the game tonight or the teams involved.

Hunter Henry has been out all year...

its ESPN right?....there you go. They network is straight garbage.

Oh here some more media hypocrisy from garbage ESPN:

https://www.outkickthecoverage.com/espn-rips-redskins-for-signing-reueben-foster-while-promoting-greg-hardy/

Included in that article, which finally discusses Hardy’s past NFL issues in the seventh paragraph, is a handy detail on why ESPN might not have brought up Hardy on their most watched television program Monday night: “The Jan. 19 UFC Fight Night will mark the first live event of a five-year deal between the UFC and ESPN.”
So ESPN has no issues at all with ripping the Washington Redskins for signing Reuben Foster, a man accused of domestic violence, but the network itself is fine with promoting Greg Hardy, a man who was found guilty of domestic violence — the charges were later vacated when the alleged victim didn’t appear in court — in an actual event where he’s fighting on their network? (To be fair, at least this time Hardy is fighting a man).


But isn’t this the height of hypocrisy for ESPN?

On Monday night you rip the Redskins to high heaven for employing a domestic abuser on your most watched program of the week and then on Wednesday you ask sports fans to tune in an watch a former NFL domestic abuser — while signing up for ESPN+ too — fight on your network?

What’s more this isn’t just any event, it’s the very FIRST event you’ve ever done with the UFC and your own website is using Hardy’s status as a former NFL player to draw attention to that fight and bring more fans to view the event.

And don’t you think it’s awfully convenient that ESPN didn’t bring up Greg Hardy with Jason Witten at all on their broadcast despite the fact that it’s incredibly relevant to the discussion?
Then two days later they announce Hardy is one of the top draws for the very first event they’re doing with the UFC?



ESPN is in the Greg Hardy business, at the sametime pundits like Jason Witten and other ESPN Garbage criticize the Skins move

Hunter Henry has been out all year...

its ESPN right?....there you go. They network is straight garbage.

Oh here some more media hypocrisy from garbage ESPN:

https://www.outkickthecoverage.com/espn-rips-redskins-for-signing-reueben-foster-while-promoting-greg-hardy/

Included in that article, which finally discusses Hardy’s past NFL issues in the seventh paragraph, is a handy detail on why ESPN might not have brought up Hardy on their most watched television program Monday night: “The Jan. 19 UFC Fight Night will mark the first live event of a five-year deal between the UFC and ESPN.”
So ESPN has no issues at all with ripping the Washington Redskins for signing Reuben Foster, a man accused of domestic violence, but the network itself is fine with promoting Greg Hardy, a man who was found guilty of domestic violence — the charges were later vacated when the alleged victim didn’t appear in court — in an actual event where he’s fighting on their network? (To be fair, at least this time Hardy is fighting a man).


But isn’t this the height of hypocrisy for ESPN?

On Monday night you rip the Redskins to high heaven for employing a domestic abuser on your most watched program of the week and then on Wednesday you ask sports fans to tune in an watch a former NFL domestic abuser — while signing up for ESPN+ too — fight on your network?

What’s more this isn’t just any event, it’s the very FIRST event you’ve ever done with the UFC and your own website is using Hardy’s status as a former NFL player to draw attention to that fight and bring more fans to view the event.

And don’t you think it’s awfully convenient that ESPN didn’t bring up Greg Hardy with Jason Witten at all on their broadcast despite the fact that it’s incredibly relevant to the discussion?
Then two days later they announce Hardy is one of the top draws for the very first event they’re doing with the UFC?



ESPN is in the Greg Hardy business, at the sametime pundits like Jason Witten and other ESPN Garbage criticize the Skins move

Holy Shit, I completely agree with you!!!

Hunter Henry has been out all year...

its ESPN right?....there you go. They network is straight garbage.

Oh here some more media hypocrisy from garbage ESPN:

https://www.outkickthecoverage.com/espn-rips-redskins-for-signing-reueben-foster-while-promoting-greg-hardy/

Included in that article, which finally discusses Hardy’s past NFL issues in the seventh paragraph, is a handy detail on why ESPN might not have brought up Hardy on their most watched television program Monday night: “The Jan. 19 UFC Fight Night will mark the first live event of a five-year deal between the UFC and ESPN.”
So ESPN has no issues at all with ripping the Washington Redskins for signing Reuben Foster, a man accused of domestic violence, but the network itself is fine with promoting Greg Hardy, a man who was found guilty of domestic violence — the charges were later vacated when the alleged victim didn’t appear in court — in an actual event where he’s fighting on their network? (To be fair, at least this time Hardy is fighting a man).


But isn’t this the height of hypocrisy for ESPN?

On Monday night you rip the Redskins to high heaven for employing a domestic abuser on your most watched program of the week and then on Wednesday you ask sports fans to tune in an watch a former NFL domestic abuser — while signing up for ESPN+ too — fight on your network?

What’s more this isn’t just any event, it’s the very FIRST event you’ve ever done with the UFC and your own website is using Hardy’s status as a former NFL player to draw attention to that fight and bring more fans to view the event.

And don’t you think it’s awfully convenient that ESPN didn’t bring up Greg Hardy with Jason Witten at all on their broadcast despite the fact that it’s incredibly relevant to the discussion?
Then two days later they announce Hardy is one of the top draws for the very first event they’re doing with the UFC?



ESPN is in the Greg Hardy business, at the sametime pundits like Jason Witten and other ESPN Garbage criticize the Skins move

Yep, that's why the company is trash now a days, SAS is a clown but this just confirms he knows nothing of what he talks about.