|
5superbowls3wins 12-31-2018, 03:01 PM Twitter update
Jay Gruden scheduled to speak in 90 minutes, which about confirms what I’ve heard for a while, he’s the Redskins coach in 2019.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
BigHairedAristocrat 12-31-2018, 03:11 PM Because we have Bruce Allen.
I'd take Bob's Big Boy as our GM over Bruce Allen.
These scenarios all assume Bruce is no longer involved. I think that’s a given.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
KI Skins Fan 12-31-2018, 03:12 PM Twitter update
Jay Gruden scheduled to speak in 90 minutes, which about confirms what I’ve heard for a while, he’s the Redskins coach in 2019.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
It confirms that Jay Gruden is about to speak. That is all it confirms.
CRedskinsRule 12-31-2018, 03:16 PM Twitter update
Jay Gruden scheduled to speak in 90 minutes, which about confirms what I’ve heard for a while, he’s the Redskins coach in 2019.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I am more frustrated that Gruden is staying then Allen. But just as frustrating is all the fan talk like something is going to change in the FO structure. This structure (or something similar with different names).
I basically agree with MTK that this is the Skins, but I don't agree with the 7-9/9-7 range. A good coach that can recognize in game adjustments, and not get stuck holding on to personnel/coaches/schemes instead of adjusting to the talent on the field. Injuries should not have given Gruden a pass, when he got the pass last year for them. Other than AS/CM breaks, most of the injuries were by players with some history (even Scherff), and in a lot of cases - even Guice's - an effective replacement was put in place. Further the defense didn't suffer major personnel injuries, and it was Gruden's DC who watched the implosion of a top run defending line to a porous defense carved up by every type of offense.
SFREDSKIN 12-31-2018, 03:20 PM It confirms that Jay Gruden is about to speak. That is all it confirms.
That quote came from NBC sports JP Finlay.
BigHairedAristocrat 12-31-2018, 03:21 PM I am more frustrated that Gruden is staying then Allen. But just as frustrating is all the fan talk like something is going to change in the FO structure. This structure (or something similar with different names).
I basically agree with MTK that this is the Skins, but I don't agree with the 7-9/9-7 range. A good coach that can recognize in game adjustments, and not get stuck holding on to personnel/coaches/schemes instead of adjusting to the talent on the field. Injuries should not have given Gruden a pass, when he got the pass last year for them. Other than AS/CM breaks, most of the injuries were by players with some history (even Scherff), and in a lot of cases - even Guice's - an effective replacement was put in place. Further the defense didn't suffer major personnel injuries, and it was Gruden's DC who watched the implosion of a top run defending line to a porous defense carved up by every type of offense.
I don’t think anyone is pleased with Gruden - he’s just likely our best realistic option. There are a ton of head coaching vacancies and ours has got to be at, or near the bottom, of most candidates lists.... and it’s an extremely weak market for coaches. There is no one out there and available whom would constitute a clear upgrade over Gruden.
Additionally we’re essentially going to operating under kind of a “salary cap penalty” next year due to Alex’s contract. It is highly unlikely we will have a good record - no matter whose coaching. So we’re better off sticking with Jay, and letting the new GM evaluate him over the next year. If we make a head coaching change, next year will he the year to do it.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
KI Skins Fan 12-31-2018, 03:26 PM Why are they trotting out Gruden to speak?
Perhaps to announce changes to his staff?
It doesn't take 90 minutes to write "I resign" and you don't announce your own firing.
I'll bet that Mr. Oblivious Snyder isn't even going to acknowledge the fans' issues with his GM and HC.
SFREDSKIN 12-31-2018, 03:27 PM I don’t think anyone is pleased with Gruden - he’s just likely our best realistic option. There are a ton of head coaching vacancies and ours has got to be at, or near the bottom, of most candidates lists.... and it’s an extremely weak market for coaches. There is no one out there and available whom would constitute a clear upgrade over Gruden.
Additionally we’re essentially going to operating under kind of a “salary cap penalty” next year due to Alex’s contract. It is highly unlikely we will have a good record - no matter whose coaching. So we’re better off sticking with Jay, and letting the new GM evaluate him over the next year. If we make a head coaching change, next year will he the year to do it.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I also think Norman returns next year at $14m/year. Too many holes to fill and not enough $$$, we’ll see.
http://www.espn.com/nfl/story/_/id/25655400/josh-norman-says-retire-one-super-bowl-win
KI Skins Fan 12-31-2018, 03:30 PM I also think Norman returns next year at $14m/year. Too many holes to fill and not enough $$$, we’ll see.
Damn, right! That should teach Norman a lesson: Screw around with DWTS and ballet and we'll punish you by keeping you on our roster.
CRedskinsRule 12-31-2018, 03:31 PM I don’t think anyone is pleased with Gruden - he’s just likely our best realistic option. There are a ton of head coaching vacancies and ours has got to be at, or near the bottom, of most candidates lists.... and it’s an extremely weak market for coaches. There is no one out there and available whom would constitute a clear upgrade over Gruden.
Additionally we’re essentially going to operating under kind of a “salary cap penalty” next year due to Alex’s contract. It is highly unlikely we will have a good record - no matter whose coaching. So we’re better off sticking with Jay, and letting the new GM evaluate him over the next year. If we make a head coaching change, next year will he the year to do it.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Your post is rational, reasonable, and absolutely a non-starter for the Skins because:
1) we aren't going to have a new GM - maybe a few position name changes but even that's not likely
2) next year our qb play will be subpar and the AS salary cap will pop up as the new excuse for keeping Gruden
3) the injury excuse will still be in play for JG as well since the team will not stop keeping injured talent way past the point they should have been let go
4) it's the Redskins and DS has gone from hyper quick to fire in the early years to holding on too long now.
|