Winning

Pages : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 [47]

Giantone
02-15-2019, 08:30 AM
So trump lost his Wall in Congress and now he will open a "Pandora"s Box calling the wall a "National Emergency".

https://www.yahoo.com/news/president-trump-apos-national-emergency-231644387.html


Politics
President Trump's National Emergency Is a Ploy to Avoid Admitting Defeat on the Wall
Time Brian Bennett,Time 14 hours ago

Mexico refused to pay for it. Congress wouldn’t shell out, either. So President Donald Trump capped a two-month battle over his border wall by deciding to go it alone.

The White House announced Thursday that Trump would sign a spending bill to avoid a second government shutdown over his signature campaign promise, then declare a national emergency in a bid to construct the wall.

“President Trump will sign the government funding bill, and as he has stated before, he will also take other executive action—including a national emergency—to ensure we stop the national security and humanitarian crisis at the border,” said Sarah Huckabee Sanders, the White House press secretary.

The unprecedented move allows Trump to signal to supporters that he’s still fighting to deliver the wall, while also sidestepping a second politically damaging shutdown just weeks after a standoff that shuttered the government for 35 days, cost the economy some $11 billion and briefly dented the President’s approval ratings. But the risky maneuver opens a Pandora’s box of future challenges, both in the courts and in Congress. And Republicans fear it raises the prospect of a future Democratic President wielding national emergencies as a tool to bypass Congress on liberal political priorities like climate change and gun restrictions.

“The precedent that the President is setting here is something that should be met with great unease and dismay by the Republicans,” House Speaker Nancy Pelosi told reporters after the White House announcement, during which she bashed Trump for mounting an “an end run” around Congress’s power of the purse.

Pelosi’s comments came exactly a year after the massacre at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School in Parkland, Fla., which killed 17 students and staff. And the Speaker used the grim anniversary to make explicit her threat. A “Democratic President can declare emergencies as well,” Pelosi said. “If the President can declare an emergency on something that he has created as an emergency, an illusion that he wants to convey, just think of what a President with different values can present to the American people.”

MTK
02-15-2019, 09:10 AM
I think we need to define the word emergency


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Giantone
02-15-2019, 11:23 AM
I think we need to define the word emergency


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Fully agree. To me it's not an emergence becuase a political party lost the majority.


I won't say this often but Pelosi is right! . If this is an "emergency" then when(not if) the next Democratic President comes along and screams about gun related violence being a National emergency then the republicans and NRA better shut the hell up.

mooby
02-15-2019, 05:05 PM
The best part of his emergency declaration speech is the "I didn't need to do this" part. That's gonna be quote #1A in every lawsuit saying an emergency declaration was unnecessary because it's not an emergency.

Giantone
02-15-2019, 05:26 PM
The best part of his emergency declaration speech is the "I didn't need to do this" part. That's gonna be quote #1A in every lawsuit saying an emergency declaration was unnecessary because it's not an emergency.

He is just too stupid to know when to STFU!

mooby
02-15-2019, 08:19 PM
He is just too stupid to know when to STFU!

We gotta be realistic here G1, as much as I hate to admit it now that partisanship has infected the SC (and even though there is prior history to form a legal opinion from) there's a realistic chance the SC votes on party lines and rules in favor of Trump once it reaches them.

Giantone
02-16-2019, 05:45 AM
We gotta be realistic here G1, as much as I hate to admit it now that partisanship has infected the SC (and even though there is prior history to form a legal opinion from) there's a realistic chance the SC votes on party lines and rules in favor of Trump once it reaches them.

I can see that but I will admit in the Courts last decision Roberts did give me some hope.

sdskinsfan2001
02-17-2019, 07:54 PM
https://memeshappen.com/media/created/winning-the-day-like-a-boss-meme-57806.jpg

EZ Archive Ads Plugin for vBulletin Copyright 2006 Computer Help Forum