skinsfan69
04-25-2018, 12:12 PM
If we draft Edmunds where would he play?
With the 13th Pick the Washington Redskins select...skinsfan69 04-25-2018, 12:12 PM If we draft Edmunds where would he play? Schneed10 04-25-2018, 12:28 PM If we draft Edmunds where would he play? ILB in base. In nickel, hybrid safety / LB. Would match him up against Zach Ertz man on man without hesitation. Schneed10 04-25-2018, 12:29 PM That percentage drops to 54% when you factor in the 3 first round picks we used to get RG3. Exactly my point. And I'd remove RG3 as a pro bowl "hit". He obviously was a bust overall, despite making that pro bowl in the one season. punch it in 04-25-2018, 12:35 PM Vita effing Vea. We simply cannot afford to get gashed up the middle anymore. It will make the entire front seven better. Payne would be my second choice. Second round trade down and get our third back. Schneed10 04-25-2018, 01:10 PM Vita effing Vea. We simply cannot afford to get gashed up the middle anymore. It will make the entire front seven better. Payne would be my second choice. Second round trade down and get our third back. Need based drafting :rolleyes: BigHairedAristocrat 04-25-2018, 01:13 PM Vita effing Vea. We simply cannot afford to get gashed up the middle anymore. It will make the entire front seven better. Payne would be my second choice. Second round trade down and get our third back. You’re forgetting that we had a very good run defense last year until Ionitas and Allen got hurt. They’re both back and healthy and we can hopefully rotate Phil Taylor in there. Using the 13th pick on a player who can’t rush the passer and would only play about 50% of snaps would be very very stupid of Bruce Allen. We need to use the pick on a playermaker who will play close to 100 percent of snaps. At least one of Derwin James, Tremaine Edmunds, Roquan Smith, or Minkah Fitzpatrick will be there at 13. I’ll be extremely disappointed if we don’t take one of them. EARTHQUAKE2689 04-25-2018, 01:39 PM Sorry? No disrespect intended. All good, I was messing, too many big words just gonna call him Vita. EARTHQUAKE2689 04-25-2018, 01:40 PM Exactly my point. And I'd remove RG3 as a pro bowl "hit". He obviously was a bust overall, despite making that pro bowl in the one season. I agree just thought it was an interesting stat. punch it in 04-25-2018, 01:58 PM Need based drafting [emoji57] I do not expect Barkley or anyone of that caliber to be available at 13 and would argue he is one of the top 15 guys available no doubt. How is that need based? Sounds like a perfect combination of need and bpa to me. Dude is an athletic freak for his size. He is going to be the pick if he is available so y’all better come around and hop on the V-train now. [emoji2] punch it in 04-25-2018, 02:03 PM You’re forgetting that we had a very good run defense last year until Ionitas and Allen got hurt. They’re both back and healthy and we can hopefully rotate Phil Taylor in there. Using the 13th pick on a player who can’t rush the passer and would only play about 50% of snaps would be very very stupid of Bruce Allen. We need to use the pick on a playermaker who will play close to 100 percent of snaps. At least one of Derwin James, Tremaine Edmunds, Roquan Smith, or Minkah Fitzpatrick will be there at 13. I’ll be extremely disappointed if we don’t take one of them. Allen got hurt in his fifth game. Of those 5 games the Chiefs gashed us for almost 200 yards and Oakland had 120. So to say we had a very good run defense before he got hurt is just not true at all. Furthermore when you got a guy like Vea eating up the middle of an offensive line is going to allow for the rest of the front 7 to better get to the passer. Since when is a NT’s number one job to rush the passer and there is no way he would play 50% of downs. https://www.sfgate.com/49ers/article/Washington-s-Vita-Vea-will-devour-steaks-QBs-12861846.php |
|
EZ Archive Ads Plugin for vBulletin Copyright 2006 Computer Help Forum