|
sdskinsfan2001 05-06-2020, 06:19 AM https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/trump-seeks-delay-accuser-s-lawsuit-after-she-requests-his-n1131841
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2019/oct/24/summer-zervos-trump-sexual-assault-claims-documents-evidence
https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/assault-allegations-donald-trump-recapped
Republicans ignored them all before ,correct?
You are literally incapable of having honest dialogue. Anytime someone post something you don't agree with, you ignore that post completely, and post somewhere between 1 and 100 posts about other things, while ignoring the original point. I'm actually dumbfounded you're 50ish+. Grow the fuck up. Also Giants suck!!! I'd wager to bet that even people that are clearly more on the left here just let you be absurd to not have to deal with your non sense.
Even if you argued more on my side I'd trade you immediately for a 7th round flyer. You are either a phony or liar.
sdskinsfan2001 05-06-2020, 06:49 AM Giantone basically hijacks all Warpath threads that discuss politics. Redskins are the better franchise and obviously have the better fan site. Can't you go ruin their website? Eli must have banhammereed you. Probably talked about the Redskins too much.
SunnySide 05-06-2020, 10:42 AM After reiterating the allegations against Biden, Carlson said, “But there is evidence on the other side as well, and we feel honor-bound to tell you about it. Just last year, Tara Reade told a very different story about what happened with Joe Biden. In 2019, she said he touched her inappropriately on the neck and shoulders. She said not that she was fired for complaining about harassment, much less being penetrated by Joe Biden. She then said she was fired because she refused to serve drinks at an event.”
Carlson then pointed out that Reade was a Bernie Sanders supporter, and questioned the timing and motive behind her allegations against Biden.
There’s the question of Reade’s politics,” Carlson said. “We normally wouldn’t get into that because it’s not germane. But keep in mind this story is unfolding during a presidential campaign. And it’s also playing out against the backdrop of fierce infighting within the Democratic Party.” Carlson later went on to add, “It’s notable that before Joe Biden started beating Bernie Sanders in the primary, Tara Reade wasn’t attacking Joe Biden, instead she had effusively positive things to say about him. In 2017, Tara Reade repeatedly praised Joe Biden for his work against sexual assault.”
https://www.yahoo.com/entertainment/tucker-carlson-questions-timing-tara-reade-allegations-against-joe-biden-081305195.html
I think one objective difference is that kavanuagh was going through a SCOTUS vetting process with hearings which allowed a large visible platform for his accusers vs Reid who has only done a handful of interviews and there are no vetting or investigative hearings going on re Biden.
I don’t know where sdskinsfan stands re the Kavanaugh’s accusers but ... I would imagine any conservative who didn’t believe kavanaughs accuser bc her accusation was decades later or she didn’t know specificities ... then now can’t claim with a straight face the Reid accusation must be taken seriously.
Shouldn’t the conservatives who blank dismissed kavanaughs accuser now must dismiss Biden accuser?
Wouldn’t that be ironic, don’t ya think?
Giantone 05-06-2020, 10:59 AM .................................................. ............................ I'm actually dumbfounded you're 50ish+. Grow the fuck up. Also Giants suck!!! I'd wager to bet that even people that are clearly more on the left here just let you be absurd to not have to deal with your non sense.
................... you're needed at the drive thru...................
Giantone 05-06-2020, 11:02 AM I'll see myself back out. I imagine by the time I wake up tomorrow, I'm going to regret saying anything.
.............so are we.
sdskinsfan2001 05-06-2020, 11:15 AM After reiterating the allegations against Biden, Carlson said, “But there is evidence on the other side as well, and we feel honor-bound to tell you about it. Just last year, Tara Reade told a very different story about what happened with Joe Biden. In 2019, she said he touched her inappropriately on the neck and shoulders. She said not that she was fired for complaining about harassment, much less being penetrated by Joe Biden. She then said she was fired because she refused to serve drinks at an event.”
Carlson then pointed out that Reade was a Bernie Sanders supporter, and questioned the timing and motive behind her allegations against Biden.
There’s the question of Reade’s politics,” Carlson said. “We normally wouldn’t get into that because it’s not germane. But keep in mind this story is unfolding during a presidential campaign. And it’s also playing out against the backdrop of fierce infighting within the Democratic Party.” Carlson later went on to add, “It’s notable that before Joe Biden started beating Bernie Sanders in the primary, Tara Reade wasn’t attacking Joe Biden, instead she had effusively positive things to say about him. In 2017, Tara Reade repeatedly praised Joe Biden for his work against sexual assault.”
https://www.yahoo.com/entertainment/tucker-carlson-questions-timing-tara-reade-allegations-against-joe-biden-081305195.html
I think one objective difference is that kavanuagh was going through a SCOTUS vetting process with hearings which allowed a large visible platform for his accusers vs Reid who has only done a handful of interviews and there are no vetting or investigative hearings going on re Biden.
I don’t know where sdskinsfan stands re the Kavanaugh’s accusers but ... I would imagine any conservative who didn’t believe kavanaughs accuser bc her accusation was decades later or she didn’t know specificities ... then now can’t claim with a straight face the Reid accusation must be taken seriously.
Shouldn’t the conservatives who blank dismissed kavanaughs accuser now must dismiss Biden accuser?
Wouldn’t that be ironic, don’t ya think?
Its not about belief or not. I get absolutely zero benefit/enjoyment out of what Biden is going thru. I wouldn't wish sexual harassment charges on anyone, without proof of guilt. I didn't dismiss Kavanaugh accusers. I also didn't just take the ball and run with it with hearsay evidence. Kavanaugh was guilty immediately. These same people that said believe all women, which means the men they accuse are automatically guilty, are no where to be found with Biden. Do we believe all women or not? If so, then the same way Kavanaugh shouldn't have been confirmed, Biden needs to drop out of the race. Or does the political views of the accused become the determining factor? Sure looks to be the latter.
It's about the assumed guilt 1 person dealt with, vs. the assumed innocence Biden gets. It's not been handled the same same and its clear as day why. Accusations against someone should be handled way closer to how it being handled for Biden, than how it was handled for Kavanaugh, for everyone. But that's not the case.
I think everyone can see the difference. Whether people will admit it or not, thats another conversation.
Chico23231 05-06-2020, 11:33 AM Ford had zero people who corroborate her account for Kavenaugh who also went through an FBI investigation
That’s the difference with the two allegations...Reade has 6-7 folks as well as her mom calling into to Larry King asking his advice...which is hysterical.
The “me too” back track is hilarious...now instead of “believe all women” aka the slogan repeated by dems and activists against Kavanuagh NOW its, due process and some women lie. The coverage is a farce. There isn’t an argument
In my own heart, I think Ford was lying or misremembering..I think Reade from what I read, I think Joe was being Joe...touchy, feely creep, but I don’t know if I believe all the other stuff. But like I’ve stated, it’s not about whether it happened or not, it’s the utter hypocrisy by the dems, media, and me too movement...there is no argument.
SunnySide 05-08-2020, 06:28 PM Kimmel 100% stepped in it with the intentionally edited pence empty box video. I kinda like pence but his religious ideology seemingly being his political compass holds me back.
SunnySide 06-20-2020, 05:00 PM Sdskinsfan ... since you asked in the non political WTF thread. Honestly I don’t see the point in pointing out trumps hypocrisies or incompetence to trump supporters because there is no point. No matter what it doesn’t change their opinions. But to feed your “liberals scream at the sky” appetite
Trumps White House hypocrisy in lying or not getting everyone on the same page to lie.
1. WH spokesperson McEnany says Barr ordered the forceful removal of protestors in DC for the church photo shoot.
Barr says he didn’t.
Attorney General William Barr says law enforcement officers were already moving to push back protesters from a park in front of the White House when he arrived there Monday evening, and he says he did not give a command to disperse the crowd, though he supported the decision.
Earlier in the week, White House spokeswoman Kayleigh McEnany told reporters it was Barr who made the decision to push back the security perimeter outside the White House on Monday morning. McEnany said that when Barr arrived at Lafayette Park later that day to survey the security situation, he was surprised to see that action had not yet been taken.
2. Barr puts out press release that the SDNY atty has resigned. (The guy looking into Giuliani)
SDNY says he didn’t and only learned about it when he saw Barr’s press release.
Barr says Trump fires him.
Trump says he did not.
Attorney General William Barr informed the District Attorney for the Southern District of New York (SDNY) Saturday that President Trump has removed him from his post, a day after the federal prosecutor refused to step down.
That's all up to the Attorney General," Trump said when asked about Berman's firing. "Attorney General Barr is working on that. That's his department, not my department."
"We have a very capable Attorney General so that's really up to him," Trump said before leaving for his first rally since March. "I'm not involved."
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/william-barr-trump-fired-sdny-federal-prosector
Honestly what’s the point in pointing this stuff out anymore ....
sdskinsfan2001 06-20-2020, 05:50 PM Sdskinsfan ... since you asked in the non political WTF thread. Honestly I don’t see the point in pointing out trumps hypocrisies or incompetence to trump supporters because there is no point. No matter what it doesn’t change their opinions. But to feed your “liberals scream at the sky” appetite
Trumps White House hypocrisy in lying or not getting everyone on the same page to lie.
1. WH spokesperson McEnany says Barr ordered the forceful removal of protestors in DC for the church photo shoot.
Barr says he didn’t.
Attorney General William Barr says law enforcement officers were already moving to push back protesters from a park in front of the White House when he arrived there Monday evening, and he says he did not give a command to disperse the crowd, though he supported the decision.
Earlier in the week, White House spokeswoman Kayleigh McEnany told reporters it was Barr who made the decision to push back the security perimeter outside the White House on Monday morning. McEnany said that when Barr arrived at Lafayette Park later that day to survey the security situation, he was surprised to see that action had not yet been taken.
2. Barr puts out press release that the SDNY atty has resigned. (The guy looking into Giuliani)
SDNY says he didn’t and only learned about it when he saw Barr’s press release.
Barr says Trump fires him.
Trump says he did not.
Attorney General William Barr informed the District Attorney for the Southern District of New York (SDNY) Saturday that President Trump has removed him from his post, a day after the federal prosecutor refused to step down.
That's all up to the Attorney General," Trump said when asked about Berman's firing. "Attorney General Barr is working on that. That's his department, not my department."
"We have a very capable Attorney General so that's really up to him," Trump said before leaving for his first rally since March. "I'm not involved."
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/william-barr-trump-fired-sdny-federal-prosector
Honestly what’s the point in pointing this stuff out anymore ....
I added an edit to my WTF post. I was just joking around. In hindsight I shouldn't have posted that there. Sounds like they aren't giving Barr the memos.
|