|
FrenchSkin 03-19-2018, 10:13 PM Just keep Cravens and let him bounce backIf his play and attitude can earn the trust of the locker room back, then he's definitely worth more than two late round picks!
Envoyé de mon SM-J320FN en utilisant Tapatalk
SkinzWin 03-19-2018, 10:29 PM https://247sports.com/nfl/washington-redskins/Bolt/Report-Broncos-made-multiple-trade-offers-for-Redskins-S-Sua-Cravens-116459518
If Denver wants him bad enough they’ll eventually make an offer worth considering. Until then he’s a part of this team.
Schneed10 03-22-2018, 12:22 PM I usually don't post unfounded bullshit, but my brain came up with this little crazy conspiracy theory this morning.
1) Redskins and Broncos have been discussing Su'a Cravens. Su'a hired Peter Schaffer, a Denver based agent. No trade has been consummated yet.
2) Broncos have the 5th pick in the draft. They definitely could look at QB. But they did just sign Keenum.
3) Redskins are unabashedly discussing their desire to solve the RB position in this draft.
Could it be, just could it be, that Cravens has been discussed as a possible part of a trade to be consummated on draft day, such that if Saquon Barkley makes it to 5 where the Broncos will be on the clock, then the Redskins will ship Cravens and the 13th plus whatever else to Denver, for the right to move up to 5 and take Saquon.
Reminder this is unfounded bullshit. Do not take this seriously as anything more than spit in the wind. I'm not even sure I'd want this deal, I just found it curious that Cravens has been discussed and that we're basically broadcasting that we intend to do something at RB.
skinsfaninok 03-22-2018, 12:23 PM I usually don't post unfounded bullshit, but my brain came up with this little crazy conspiracy theory this morning.
1) Redskins and Broncos have been discussing Su'a Cravens. Su'a hired Peter Schaffer, a Denver based agent. No trade has been consummated yet.
2) Broncos have the 5th pick in the draft. They definitely could look at QB. But they did just sign Keenum.
3) Redskins are unabashedly discussing their desire to solve the RB position in this draft.
Could it be, just could it be, that Cravens has been discussed as a possible part of a trade to be consummated on draft day, such that if Saquon Barkley makes it to 5 where the Broncos will be on the clock, then the Redskins will ship Cravens and the 13th plus whatever else to Denver, for the right to move up to 5 and take Saquon.
Reminder this is unfounded bullshit. Do not take this seriously as anything more than spit in the wind. I'm not even sure I'd want this deal, I just found it curious that Cravens has been discussed and that we're basically broadcasting that we intend to do something at RB.
I would love barkley, but I just don't see them getting that for Cravens and the 13.. It would prob have to include a 1st next yr or our 2nd this yr.
Schneed10 03-22-2018, 12:25 PM I would love barkley, but I just don't see them getting that for Cravens and the 13.. It would prob have to include a 1st next yr or our 2nd this yr.
Reading is fundamental, you respond so quickly that you don't even finish reading.
I said 'plus whatever else'.
I usually don't post unfounded bullshit, but my brain came up with this little crazy conspiracy theory this morning.
1) Redskins and Broncos have been discussing Su'a Cravens. Su'a hired Peter Schaffer, a Denver based agent. No trade has been consummated yet.
2) Broncos have the 5th pick in the draft. They definitely could look at QB. But they did just sign Keenum.
3) Redskins are unabashedly discussing their desire to solve the RB position in this draft.
Could it be, just could it be, that Cravens has been discussed as a possible part of a trade to be consummated on draft day, such that if Saquon Barkley makes it to 5 where the Broncos will be on the clock, then the Redskins will ship Cravens and the 13th plus whatever else to Denver, for the right to move up to 5 and take Saquon.
Reminder this is unfounded bullshit. Do not take this seriously as anything more than spit in the wind. I'm not even sure I'd want this deal, I just found it curious that Cravens has been discussed and that we're basically broadcasting that we intend to do something at RB.
Imagine getting Barkley? Pretty sure my head would explode
GridIron26 03-22-2018, 12:38 PM I usually don't post unfounded bullshit, but my brain came up with this little crazy conspiracy theory this morning.
1) Redskins and Broncos have been discussing Su'a Cravens. Su'a hired Peter Schaffer, a Denver based agent. No trade has been consummated yet.
2) Broncos have the 5th pick in the draft. They definitely could look at QB. But they did just sign Keenum.
3) Redskins are unabashedly discussing their desire to solve the RB position in this draft.
Could it be, just could it be, that Cravens has been discussed as a possible part of a trade to be consummated on draft day, such that if Saquon Barkley makes it to 5 where the Broncos will be on the clock, then the Redskins will ship Cravens and the 13th plus whatever else to Denver, for the right to move up to 5 and take Saquon.
Reminder this is unfounded bullshit. Do not take this seriously as anything more than spit in the wind. I'm not even sure I'd want this deal, I just found it curious that Cravens has been discussed and that we're basically broadcasting that we intend to do something at RB.
This is interesting scenario.. I really don't like the idea of trading to move up but then I don't watch college football much so I don't know Barkley that much other than what everyone is saying. I suppose it depends on what we give up, after all, we still need to resolve LG and D-line issue.
skinsfaninok 03-22-2018, 12:41 PM Reading is fundamental, you respond so quickly that you don't even finish reading.
I said 'plus whatever else'.
I know, that's why I said plus a 2nd or a 1 next yr. Either way it would be great to get him.
skinsfaninok 03-22-2018, 12:43 PM This is interesting scenario.. I really don't like the idea of trading to move up but then I don't watch college football much so I don't know Barkley that much other than what everyone is saying. I suppose it depends on what we give up, after all, we still need to resolve LG and D-line issue.
He's got potential but there have been so many RB bust over the years, it is tough to trade a lot for one.
|