What would it take?

No no, the entertaining part is watching the bleeding hearts freak out.
Lotsa good you tube stuff.

I guess they are accurate as far as him doing amazing things. An amazing job. Lol.
The point is that if someone had asked him what he did or if he has ever spoken to him Trump would have had to think about it! Lol. Neither him nor Spicer had any idea - he is being recognized more by who? People who have been on the fence about equal rights for blacks??? "I notice ". Wtf does that mean? I hope you "notice ". Lol. You have had since 1895 to do so!
No excuses whatsoever.

It's an obtuse argument. He was recognizing the African-American Museum. GUESS WHAT MUSEUMS HELP PEOPLE DO. Learn more and more about the things/people/history that the museum built to honor.

I feel like we need a 7th grade teacher to help libs diagram sentences or learn listening and reading comprehension. I'll try my best to help:

I am very proud now that we have a museum on the National Mall
What he is talking about

where people can learn about Reverend King, so many other things.
why is he proud - so people can learn

Frederick Douglass is an example of somebody who’s done an amazing job and is being recognized more and more,
an example of where the new museum is helping it's visitors learn more about and recognize historical figures amazing accomplishments.

I notice -- Harriet Tubman, Rosa Parks, and millions more black Americans who made America what it is today.
more recognition

Big impact.
Trump emphasis

Note that what the person who asked the question did
-- "When President Trump said "Frederick Douglass was being recognized more and more", do you know what he was specifically referring to?"

Now, be honest, if you read the paragraph it's not really hard to know what Pres Trump was referring to, right?

And by taking the 8 words out of that context, it is misleading at best.

and for the grammar police, yes Trump's who's done, would have been better phrased as "who did", not who has done.

more to the point, the media took what was a positive statement about the new African American museum made at a breakfast celebrating African Americans, and turned it into Donald Trump sounding ignorant and racist. And does the rest of the media say, no, Donald Trump was praising the museum's impact. No, they do not. They run with the false characterization and repeat it enough so that is the "truth".

Sorta like the missing MLK bust...

more to the point, the media took what was a positive statement about the new African American museum made at a breakfast celebrating African Americans, and turned it into Donald Trump sounding ignorant and racist. And does the rest of the media say, no, Donald Trump was praising the museum's impact. No, they do not. They run with the false characterization and repeat it enough so that is the "truth".

Sorta like the missing MLK bust...

2017
The Year of fake news.

Yes I edited it.
:doh:

2017 lol

Im not debunking, I just feel the need to point out these accusations of the media being biased are certainly true. its a witchhunt. Unfortunately this generation we are raising believes everything its told...Im serious. Its a generation of "if the internet says it and/or if people "like" or gives it "thumbs up" then that's all the validation I need."



So when a major news organization says the President threatens Mexico with Troops...come'on



Let's reserve the term "witch hunt" for the innocent who are being attacked for no reason. Like I said forget the bias from fox or cnn or anyone else. There are plenty of things he has done or said that are more than enough to warrant protesting or witch hunts or straight up disdain for the man.
Fake news is just a ploy to deflect anyone who disagrees with him or takes umbrage with something he said.
Those things being deflected happened. He tweeted it. He said it. It is on record, on video. More than enough garbage has legitimately come out of the mans mouth. Who cares if there is made up shit thrown on top? It does not delegitimize the real news.

Let's reserve the term "witch hunt" for the innocent who are being attacked for no reason. Like I said forget the bias from fox or cnn or anyone else. There are plenty of things he has done or said that are more than enough to warrant protesting or witch hunts or straight up disdain for the man.
Fake news is just a ploy to deflect anyone who disagrees with him or takes umbrage with something he said.
Those things being deflected happened. He tweeted it. He said it. It is on record, on video. More than enough garbage has legitimately come out of the mans mouth. Who cares if there is made up shit thrown on top? It does not delegitimize the real news.

:doh::doh::doh::doh::doh:

It's an obtuse argument. He was recognizing the African-American Museum. GUESS WHAT MUSEUMS HELP PEOPLE DO. Learn more and more about the things/people/history that the museum built to honor.



I feel like we need a 7th grade teacher to help libs diagram sentences or learn listening and reading comprehension. I'll try my best to help:







Note that what the person who asked the question did

-- "When President Trump said "Frederick Douglass was being recognized more and more", do you know what he was specifically referring to?"



Now, be honest, if you read the paragraph it's not really hard to know what Pres Trump was referring to, right?



And by taking the 8 words out of that context, it is misleading at best.



and for the grammar police, yes Trump's who's done, would have been better phrased as "who did", not who has done.



Im glad it took a museum in 2017 to make Trump notice Frederick Douglas. Smfh. It is really simple to see how moronic his statement was. You can dissect it all you want CRed.
As for seventh graders isnt that when most Americans "notice" what a great job Frederick Douglass did? Lmao.

:doh::doh::doh::doh::doh:

http://www.familysecuritymatters.org/imgLib/20140821_whatdifferencedoesitmake.jpg

:doh::doh::doh::doh::doh:



Chico if you see and hear the man say something vile with your own eyes and ears about women , and than the next day some bogus news source reports that he also said Santa Claus is a bitch does that mean he didn't say what you heard with your own ears? Why is that "doh". Who gives a fuck about Santa (sending troops to Mexico), when he called out women (mexicans are going to pay for the wall, rapists , etc)?