Chico23231
02-22-2017, 11:08 PM
We can't fuck this up, can we?
Kirk Cousins 365 threadPages :
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
[57]
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
Chico23231 02-22-2017, 11:08 PM We can't fuck this up, can we? sdskinsfan2001 02-22-2017, 11:15 PM Trade Cousins and use the 49ers # 2 overall pick to draft Deshaun Watson and the best defensive player at # 17. We'd basically get a new QB with way more upside at a fraction of the cost, we could use that money to sign other free agents or roll over into the following years cap. I know people don't think as highly as Watson as I do, but I would be down w/ that. And people have already hit on this, there is no way we're giving our # 17 overall pick as part of any Cousins trade. That would be full retard and you never go full retard. skinsfaninok 02-22-2017, 11:26 PM Trade Cousins and use the 49ers # 2 overall pick to draft Deshaun Watson and the best defensive player at # 17. We'd basically get a new QB with way more upside at a fraction of the cost, we could use that money to sign other free agents or roll over into the following years cap. I know people don't think as highly as Watson as I do, but I would be down w/ that. And people have already hit on this, there is no way we're giving our # 17 overall pick as part of any Cousins trade. That would be full retard and you never go full retard. No to Watson, he's not accurate at all and he'd be another one hit wonder. I'd rather use that pick on an impact player from the Start and sign a vet QB for a couple years. Maybe take Watson at 17 but that's pushing it sdskinsfan2001 02-22-2017, 11:43 PM No to Watson, he's not accurate at all and he'd be another one hit wonder. I'd rather use that pick on an impact player from the Start and sign a vet QB for a couple years. Maybe take Watson at 17 but that's pushing it Like I said, I seem to like him more than everyone else. But he is more than a 1 year wonder. He was awesome at Clemson each year he was there, including beating what many people were discussing as one of the better teams of all times in the championship game. He completed over 67% his passes every year for 3 years. I think his accuracy is ok, but he needs to cut down on the INTs. If we didn't pick a QB though, we couldn't go wrong with getting J. Allen from Alabama. SFREDSKIN 02-23-2017, 01:18 AM Fire Allen, problem solved!! Brody81 02-23-2017, 06:30 AM Like I said, I seem to like him more than everyone else. But he is more than a 1 year wonder. He was awesome at Clemson each year he was there, including beating what many people were discussing as one of the better teams of all times in the championship game. He completed over 67% his passes every year for 3 years. I think his accuracy is ok, but he needs to cut down on the INTs. If we didn't pick a QB though, we couldn't go wrong with getting J. Allen from Alabama. RG3 was pretty awesome in College as well. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk MTK 02-23-2017, 09:35 AM Can't believe I'm even asking this but would you rather have Cutler or Romo? Excuse me now while I go and vomit. TheMalcolmConnection 02-23-2017, 09:44 AM Cutler. I've hated Romo so much for so many years, I couldn't bring myself to like him ever. Kope 02-23-2017, 09:54 AM Romo. We tried zero leadership with Jeff George. Besides, I just think how hard I would laugh if Romo won SB w/ skins before Jerry did w/ Dak. Unlikley, I know but worth thinking about.....LOL SmootSmack 02-23-2017, 09:55 AM Can't believe I'm even asking this but would you rather have Cutler or Romo? Excuse me now while I go and vomit. Romo, without question |
|
EZ Archive Ads Plugin for vBulletin Copyright 2006 Computer Help Forum