Recount Opinions

The Presidency is one man who sits in an office

For those whose butts are hurt because the "office of the Presidency" has been tarnished, trust me when I tell you the "office of the Presidency" that has seen the likes of Garfield, Tyler, Johnson, Nixon, Bush, and Obama and survived, it will muddle past Trump as well.


Yes the office will survive Trump ,the question is will the country?

I guess a little common decency is too much to ask for from the President. Sad!

:laughing2

Everything That Made Donald Trump ‘Sad’ in 2016, According to His Tweets (http://www.newsweek.com/everything-made-donald-trump-sad-2016-533949)

:laughing2



Everything That Made Donald Trump ‘Sadâ€[emoji769] in 2016, According to His Tweets (http://www.newsweek.com/everything-made-donald-trump-sad-2016-533949)


lol

What's really sad is his vocabulary, someone get this guy a thesaurus

Yes the office will survive Trump ,the question is will the country?

Yes, and likely prosper.

Yes, and likely prosper.

I don't disagree on that, if you deregulate everything and admit you give no shits about the environment there's plenty of money to be made. Luckily with a majority in every branch of gov't and business executives with financial incentives to loosen restrictions in charge of all major gov't departments there's nobody to stop that from happening! It's all a part of his 4 phase plan:

Phase 1: loosen restrictions
Phase 2: Profits go up!
Phase 3:___________
Phase 4: Everyone's lives are better!

Yup, deregulate, cash in, wait for the crash, and leave a big mess for the next guy.

It's easy for people to dismiss but I disagree with how often his opinions change. Two years ago he names Meryl Streep as one of his favorite actors and now she's overrated?

And Cred, your whole thing about him creating discussions by attacking his critics on Twitter is weak. In two weeks, he's the President. Stop being so thin-skinned and focus on the important shit. There are two kinds of people that sees his Twitter attacks, the ones like you who are his fans who just say "he's telling it like it is, and you're just mad because he's defending himself on a public platform, which you're not used to because other politicians don't do it." And then there's us, who are sitting here like "don't you have anything better to be focusing on then responding to whoever your newest critic is on Twitter?" What's next? Is he gonna set aside time every day to challenge his critics through social media as part of his daily routine? Maybe we should all just say nice things about him, because clearly if you are a critic you are dead to him.



Pretty much exactly how I feel. I wanted to mention the whole contradiction thing, but forgot. Glad u did. You could write an entire book of simply contradictions that he has made. Almost anything he says, you can find him saying the exact opposite- two days ago, weeks, years, decades. This guy has been lying cheating and scamming for so long he has no fucking idea what he said or didnt say. He seriously belongs in an institution.

Yes, and likely prosper.



Why because he said so? Lol. Unless you are a fellow billionaire you aint getting any richer.

Great job Congress: The Senate Just Voted to Roll Back Women's Health Care (http://nymag.com/thecut/2017/01/the-senate-just-voted-to-roll-back-womens-healthcare.html?mid=facebook_thecutblog)

I really enjoyed paying for my wife's birth control. Glad I get to do it again...

I don't care which side you're on with this one, gotta' love a religious based repeal.

Editorial - With Trump 'bombshell,' fake news gains new life - Richmond Times-Dispatch: OUR OPINION (http://www.richmond.com/opinion/our-opinion/article_b17151f1-3db1-52f6-bd1c-b51a37939e6e.html)

great take here. Buzzfeed has been educating folks about fake news...of course this became an issue "only" after Hillary loss because we need to blame someone other than the candidate.

So Buzzfeed is upset with false, fake news, but then they turn around an publish fake news. Folks you cant make up this hypocrisy.

"Somebody has been shopping the document around for a while, but reputable news organizations did not report on it because, as New York Times executive editor Dean Baquet explained, its contents are "totally unsubstantiated.""