|
CRedskinsRule 09-07-2018, 04:24 PM Nice speech, but your spin isn't very good....you can't blame me for ruining anything .Yes the cult,trumpettes the trump supporters what ever category you choose to be associated with is what ruins the discussion and as far as I am concerned the country. By refusing to acknowledge any of trumps wrong doings to even worse brushing them to the side.You say you agree ....but support him anyway,........can't have it both ways. I admit to you and will say to all ...you're being nice when you say I have a bias about trump ,I do not. I down right hate(yes that word) hate him .My knowledge of the man goes back to the 70's and friends who worked in Atlantic City for him.Many ,many people got hurt and lost jobs and business's ,some lost it all!Do I expect you to understand ,no but he has been a lying cheating son S.O.B for years and I see him doing to this country what he did to people I knew so pardon me if I don't see things in your way. To ignore the way he has wrecked the image of this country around the World and for him to assume that this country wasn't great,fuck him. The worst thing is when people like the cult sit there and think he is right ,they are all just saying fuck you America.
didn't make 2 sentences :(
you ruin it by repetitively answering with non-answers.
you hate the guy- got it.
...stop filling these threads with your drivel.
Giantone 09-07-2018, 04:42 PM didn't make 2 sentences :(
you ruin it by repetitively answering with non-answers.
you hate the guy- got it.
...stop filling these threads with your drivel.
I didn't think you would most of his people have the same attention level he does.
Giantone 09-07-2018, 04:43 PM The truth will come sooner than later...No way NYT would run it unless it was inner circle high ranking white house official...Im gonna say Id lean Kelly.
If its not a high ranking, top 15 senior official, then this whole thing is a farce.
Holy SHIT.....................................we agree . Sept 7,2018 mark it down.:doh:
Chico23231 09-13-2018, 04:47 PM https://money.cnn.com/2018/09/13/media/google-leaked-video-trump/index.html
Leaked Google video fuels conservative claims of political bias from tech giants
Naw, im sure its nothing...
Chico23231 09-25-2018, 11:52 AM Looks like Google trying to limited access to information and push liberal bias with a political agenda. President is right again:
Google Workers Discussed Tweaking Search Function to Counter Travel Ban
https://www.wsj.com/articles/google-workers-discussed-tweaking-search-function-to-counter-travel-ban-1537488472
Google staff discussed ways to tweak search results to counter Trump's travel ban
https://www.cnbc.com/2018/09/21/google-staff-discussed-tweaking-search-results-after-trump-travel-ban.html
https://money.cnn.com/2018/09/13/media/google-leaked-video-trump/index.html
Leaked Google video fuels conservative claims of political bias from tech giants
Naw, im sure its nothing...
Does reporting this make CNN less bias?
Chico23231 09-25-2018, 01:37 PM Does reporting this make CNN less bias?
When its buried in the CNNMoney section, no.
Especially at a time when Tech companies are big news makers when it comes to spreading fake news, Russian interference, protecting customer information....all these are front page, headline-type news.
Plus this company has been accused many times of bias within its products...seems like hard evidence backing these confirming this biased would be news...the problem is CNN which supports the same political agenda buries the story.
So sure reporting it is fine...but you think this is honest coverage? You think Don Lemon or Anderson will do a panel on it tonight?
This should be moving the needle...Im sure if a CEO and its board came out and crushed Hillary Clinton or Bernie Sanders as evil socialists who should pass regs to hurt its business...on stage at a townhall...would be more news worthy and the position of the CNNs covering it would be faux outrage.
Im just trying to get people think evenly about the coverage of the country by the media and social media companies.
I think Google and Facebook are starting to make the case for Regulations.
Chico23231 10-02-2018, 03:18 PM 1. https://money.cnn.com/2018/10/02/media/new-york-times-kavanaugh-tweet/index.html
"New York Times says it was a mistake to enlist writer who posted anti-Kavanaugh tweet to report on him"
2. https://money.cnn.com/2018/09/14/media/nikki-haley-new-york-times-curtains/index.html?iid=EL
New York Times amends report that improperly pinned pricey curtains on Nikki Haley
The initial story written by reporter Gardiner Harris carried the headline, "Nikki Haley's View of New York Is Priceless. Her Curtains? $52,701."
But the original story included a comment from a spokesperson for Haley who said plans to purchase the curtains were made during the end of the Obama administration and that Haley had no say in the purchase.
The story drew significant backlash on social media, prompting editors to review it. Following review, The Times concluded that the story had "created an unfair impression about who was responsible for the purchase in question
Its really ashame and a sham people continue to believe the New York Times is unbiased. Folks the proof is in the pudding...couple more stories of NYT biased and walking back shit
Giantone 10-02-2018, 04:18 PM 1. https://money.cnn.com/2018/10/02/media/new-york-times-kavanaugh-tweet/index.html
"New York Times says it was a mistake to enlist writer who posted anti-Kavanaugh tweet to report on him"
2. https://money.cnn.com/2018/09/14/media/nikki-haley-new-york-times-curtains/index.html?iid=EL
New York Times amends report that improperly pinned pricey curtains on Nikki Haley
The initial story written by reporter Gardiner Harris carried the headline, "Nikki Haley's View of New York Is Priceless. Her Curtains? $52,701."
But the original story included a comment from a spokesperson for Haley who said plans to purchase the curtains were made during the end of the Obama administration and that Haley had no say in the purchase.
The story drew significant backlash on social media, prompting editors to review it. Following review, The Times concluded that the story had "created an unfair impression about who was responsible for the purchase in question
Its really ashame and a sham people continue to believe the New York Times is unbiased. Folks the proof is in the pudding...couple more stories of NYT biased and walking back shit
LOL, so you bitching about a media outlet that admitted to it's mistakes and corrected them? The trump cult at it again folks!
CRedskinsRule 10-19-2018, 12:46 PM I know we mostly all agree that there is bias in CNN/Fox News, but leading up to the election the spin on both sides is not just oozing it's flooding both their front pages.
Samples right now:
assorted CNN front page headlines: 45 bizarre lines from Trumps last speech, Why Trump doesn't want to punish Saudis, Beta O'rourke supports impeaching Trump
not one positive spin headline towards republican or conservatives
assorted Fox front page headlines: Gray Lady Gripes - Unpopular Clinton told to be quiet by NYT board member, Texas Dems accused of asking non-citizens to vote
not one positive spin headline toward democrat or liberals.
Maybe this is just me, but it's frustrating that short of Reuters there just is no balanced news anymore. I mean I watch both sides, and I try to be objective, but I know I'm not. I just wish there were some journalists and media sources that you knew you could trust to be objective and present both sides fairly pro and con.
|