Media Bias

But shouldnt the media be presenting important information in a neutral manor and let the public decide? This is what the question is...the media should not be influencing the public by pompous sensationalize reporting that is mostly based on opinion and not facts. Plus using non-verified sources or just using anonymous sources seems like it leaves a lot of facts unchecked and assumptions to be made...

It's a fact the mainstream media is staunchly bias in this case.

I stopped reading once I realized its a trash website.

To a trump supporter any site is a "trash site" unless it follows the book of trump so the cult can follow.

But shouldnt the media be presenting important information in a neutral manor and let the public decide? This is what the question is...the media should not be influencing the public by pompous sensationalize reporting that is mostly based on opinion and not facts. Plus using non-verified sources or just using anonymous sources seems like it leaves a lot of facts unchecked and assumptions to be made...

It's a fact the mainstream media is staunchly bias in this case.


I asked this question before and I will ask it again,what "MSM(main stream media) will you accept?Name the "news organization" you will listen to?
I also didn't get an answer about FOX reporting bad news on Trump 52% of the time,HELL .............even they know they can't keep the lies up anymore!

But shouldnt the media be presenting important information in a neutral manor and let the public decide? This is what the question is...the media should not be influencing the public by pompous sensationalize reporting that is mostly based on opinion and not facts. Plus using non-verified sources or just using anonymous sources seems like it leaves a lot of facts unchecked and assumptions to be made...

It's a fact the mainstream media is staunchly bias in this case.

That sounds nice but in reality media organizations exist to make money and as long as that is the case they will pick and choose the angle to report.

Also, we need to start separating credible places like the AP and Reuters from media that tries to pass op-eds off like they're actually news. The lines between news and opinions are being intentionally blurred because they are getting results. Yeah, I get my news from MSNBC, but I stick to articles they are publishing that were written by the AP or another credible company like Reuters.

To a trump supporter any site is a "trash site" unless it follows the book of trump so the cult can follow.

Every single article on the front page was about Trump.
Every single article was a negative article about Trump.
Duh......
Its just web space to have an anti Trump circle jerk, its not news.

Every single article on the front page was about Trump.
Every single article was a negative article about Trump.
Duh......
Its just web space to have an anti Trump circle jerk, its not news.

So what you're saying is, if Trump says something, or signs yet another bill/executive order, that's not news? Or the media shouldn't report it when he signs a bill or does something that directly contradicts something he said when Obama was president?

So what you're saying is, if Trump says something, or signs yet another bill/executive order, that's not news? Or the media shouldn't report it when he signs a bill or does something that directly contradicts something he said when Obama was president?

No, thats not what I'm saying.
I'm saying that wasnt a credible news website.
I dont even know if I'd call it news.
It reads more like a John Podesta/Wolf Blitzer blog.

No, thats not what I'm saying.
I'm saying that wasnt a credible news website.
I dont even know if I'd call it news.
It reads more like a John Podesta/Wolf Blitzer blog.

I'm not gonna defend that website considering I don't consider them a reputable source either. But this convo sounds like the lines are being blurred between that site and the credible ones. But then again, the only credible ones nowadays are the AP/Reuters/maybe a couple others.

No, thats not what I'm saying.
I'm saying that wasnt a credible news website.
I dont even know if I'd call it news.
It reads more like a John Podesta/Wolf Blitzer blog.

Here knock yourself out.The news is the exact same!

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/05/10/us/politics/trump-russia-meeting-american-reporters-blocked.html?_r=0


Trump Bars U.S. Reporters From Meeting With Russian Officials : NPR (http://www.npr.org/2017/05/11/527990596/trump-bars-u-s-reporters-from-meeting-with-russian-officials)


https://www.wsj.com/articles/white-house-denies-trump-gave-classified-information-to-russian-officials-1494890345

Here knock yourself out.The news is the exact same!

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/05/10/us/politics/trump-russia-meeting-american-reporters-blocked.html?_r=0


Trump Bars U.S. Reporters From Meeting With Russian Officials : NPR (http://www.npr.org/2017/05/11/527990596/trump-bars-u-s-reporters-from-meeting-with-russian-officials)


https://www.wsj.com/articles/white-house-denies-trump-gave-classified-information-to-russian-officials-1494890345

Yea yea...saw it on some other websites too.
But thanks for being there for me sweetheart.
And not the first time he's kicked reporters out.
In most cases they deserve it.

Doesnt change anything though, the left driven media sucks monkey ass.