Media Bias

like I stated before in a post to Moobs...I shouldn't have to explain the intersecting lines between this 2 industries. There isn't any connection in anyways? We don't live in that world anymore.




That could be turned around on you! There are "opinion shows" and then there is the news.Many Americans can tell the difference.just as their are "opinion pieces in Newspapers,people new it was a "columnist who wrote it and their opinion .Now you have people on the internet tell the world that some Joe Smo's blog is news becuase they can provide a link to it and then others call that the MSM,No,it's cheap and it's lazy to blame the media for everything and it is most definitely lazy to call all media the "liberal media" ,you act like FOX Media doesn't exists.

The Tangerine President is going to start a effing war sooner or later!

Donald Trump refuses to certify Iran nuclear deal (http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2017/10/13/donald-trump-expected-promise-tough-action-iran-landmark-speech/)



So he wants Iran deal gone even though they are complying and he won't Implement the Russian Sanctions,wonderful!


Is Trump dragging his feet on Russian sanctions? | MSNBC (http://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow-show/trump-dragging-his-feet-russian-sanctions)

I think its fairly naïve and lazy not to acknowledge facts. Media is biased and liberal.

Like I said, when these clowns in Hollywood tell you how to think and vote, point and laugh. That's what most of the country has done.

Yes, Fox News, Breitbart, and The Blaze are all biased and liberal. Like I said, media is an all-encompassing term. Being specific only helps your cause.

Just remember folks, when Matt Damon, Ben Affleck, Meryl Streep are telling you who to vote for, how you should act, etc. You just look at them and laugh...they know very little of the real world. Its proven.

So what is the difference when Politicians are telling you who to vote for,I mean don't they have a vested interest in swaying your vote?I have said this before but entertainers have always been political Bob Hope,Frank Sinatra etc but to me the best example was during Vietnam with Bob Dylan, Peter Paul and Mary, the Byrds,Phil Ochs,Woody and Arlo Guthrie and Pete Seeger,Crosby Stills and Nash(and Young).Like it or not they did help shorten the Vietnam war(conflict)

Entertainers have a platform not many people get so they use it to the best they can,so what? It's up to you and I to either like and or agree or disagree with them.That is America.

So what is the difference when Politicians are telling you who to vote for,I mean don't they have a vested interest in swaying your vote?I have said this before but entertainers have always been political Bob Hope,Frank Sinatra etc but to me the best example was during Vietnam with Bob Dylan, Peter Paul and Mary, the Byrds,Phil Ochs,Woody and Arlo Guthrie and Pete Seeger,Crosby Stills and Nash(and Young).Like it or not they did help shorten the Vietnam war(conflict)

Entertainers have a platform not many people get so they use it to the best they can,so what? It's up to you and I to either like and or agree or disagree with them.That is America.

There is a big difference between constructing art to send an effective message versus grandstanding, talking about things they cannot to relate too or being a hypocrite for causes from which their own platform is built upon don’t practice it. Clear as fuck examples when talking about Hollywood and the media: gender equality when it comes to pay and sexual assault and rape in the workplace.

These people are clowns...don’t tell the rest of the country how to live when when you allow this type of behavior in your workplace.

Yes, Fox News, Breitbart, and The Blaze are all biased and liberal. Like I said, media is an all-encompassing term. Being specific only helps your cause.

Mooby for like the tenth time...I’m talking about mainstream media which reaches most folks...nbc, abc, cbs, cnn and yes Fox I’ll put in there.

I’m not including msnbc, huffington, breibart, blaze, etc...these are established biased, gossip, and....opinion-based NOT fact-based so-called news orgs.

There is a big difference between constructing art to send an effective message versus grandstanding, talking about things they cannot to relate too or being a hypocrite for causes from which their own platform is built upon don’t practice it. Clear as fuck examples when talking about Hollywood and the media: gender equality when it comes to pay and sexual assault and rape in the workplace.

These people are clowns...don’t tell the rest of the country how to live when when you allow this type of behavior in your workplace.





LOL, don't look now but you just describe our political leaders. The people you seem to like to bash have the same rights you do and use them the same way you do.

Chico ,as has been said before,you seem to like to bash the messenger ,not the message.

LOL, don't look now but you just describe our political leaders. The people you seem to like to bash have the same rights you do and use them the same way you do.

Chico ,as has been said before,you seem to like to bash the messenger ,not the message.

I’m mostly bashing packaging/presentation of the message. You can manipulate that piece to change it to what you like. I work in business control and quality operations...so it’s natural for me to sift through information and separate

Mooby for like the tenth time...I’m talking about mainstream media which reaches most folks...nbc, abc, cbs, cnn and yes Fox I’ll put in there.

I’m not including msnbc, huffington, breibart, blaze, etc...these are established biased, gossip, and....opinion-based NOT fact-based so-called news orgs.

If you didn't that's how I'd know you're full of shit lol, fucking Fox News is the go-to for every right winger in this nation.

Also, I'm sure you don't check out MSNBC, but if you do you'll see that 90% of their content is just reposting other people's articles. Yes they're guilty of reposting op-eds too and trying to present them like they're actual news, but anybody with half a brain can read the article and realize it's just some other dumbass presenting his/her opinion on the subject.

Also you want to know the most hilarious part? I've seen Fox News articles reposted on MSN. Literally. I will go get you proof if you think I'm lying.

‘Beautiful Girls’ Scribe Scott Rosenberg On Harvey Weinstein | Deadline (http://deadline.com/2017/10/scott-rosenberg-harvey-weinstein-miramax-beautiful-girls-guilt-over-sexual-assault-allegations-1202189525/)

This is the single best piece of writing I've read about the Weinstein allegations. Sums it up quite nicely.