Media Bias

That answers one of my questions.

Smart person wouldn't have needed to ask the question. Plain to see you ignore the message.

https://www.foxnews.com/media/flashback-ted-koppel-predicted-cnn-ratings-toilet-without-donald-trump

Ted Koppel predicted CNN ratings 'would be in the toilet without Donald Trump'
Total-day viewership at CNN down 70 percent since Biden took office

https://nypost.com/2022/08/18/brian-stelter-to-leave-cnn-reliable-sources-program-canceled/

Brian Stelter to leave CNN, ‘Reliable Sources’ program canceled


Lolololololol…carry your ass outta here. Brian Stelter has been fired!

https://www.foxnews.com/media/flashback-ted-koppel-predicted-cnn-ratings-toilet-without-donald-trump

Ted Koppel predicted CNN ratings 'would be in the toilet without Donald Trump'
Total-day viewership at CNN down 70 percent since Biden took office

https://nypost.com/2022/08/18/brian-stelter-to-leave-cnn-reliable-sources-program-canceled/

Brian Stelter to leave CNN, ‘Reliable Sources’ program canceled


Lolololololol…carry your ass outta here. Brian Stelter has been fired!

LOL, without Sean or Tucker where do you think FOX would be? JHC chico you're an idiot!

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Fasw68zWQAMvBuj?format=jpg&name=small

Quality journalism like this will be missed.

Gee, I wonder why Americans have completely lost all trust in the media?

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Fasw68zWQAMvBuj?format=jpg&name=small

Quality journalism like this will be missed.

Gee, I wonder why Americans have completely lost all trust in the media?

LOL, can't take it when they point out how stupid your golden God is? Coming from you this is funny you have no clue what the word hypocrite means do you?

So was watching the local Tucson news station and they were reporting on the 2 AZ abortion laws on the books (SC has to decide if new or old take effect), They described both as total abortion bans that only allow abortions to save the life of the mother and left it at that.

An another way they could have described them is one law allows 98% of abortions that were previously legal but the other is almost a total abortion ban.

Absolutely blatant media bias in how they reported that story. They wanted to give the impression that both were the same, when in reality they were massively different.

Newest law regulates (saving the Life of the Mother) abortions after 15 weeks , while the older law regulates from conception.

So was watching the local Tucson news station and they were reporting on the 2 AZ abortion laws on the books (SC has to decide if new or old take effect), They described both as total abortion bans that only allow abortions to save the life of the mother and left it at that.

An another way they could have described them is one law allows 98% of abortions that were previously legal but the other is almost a total abortion ban.

Absolutely blatant media bias in how they reported that story. They wanted to give the impression that both were the same, when in reality they were massively different.

Newest law regulates (saving the Life of the Mother) abortions after 15 weeks , while the older law regulates from conception.

I dont understand .. outsider looking in

I thought AZ had a 1900s era ban on all abortions. That was put on hold - injunction when roe came down ... now the republican AZ just won in court with a ruling that the old 1900s law is now good law again.

1900s law makes it a crime for anyone to perform an abortion

BUT new AZ law prohibits after 15 weeks ....

Sounds like AZ needs to decide what law is the law

I do see the irritation if you are in the "pro govt making medical decisions for women" camp as the new 15 week one is not a near total ban.

Why would you trust a local news station though? they report the weather and traffic. I wouldnt listen to them for anything of substance. They have to produce a new show every day focusing on daily topcis .. dont have time or knowledge to do deep dive reporting.

Local news trying to do serious reporting .. god bless em.

--------

funny quote I did see

"We applaud the Court for upholding the will of the .... legislature!"

Did AZ have and then pull the idea of allowing the citizens to vote on abortion .. after "we the people" spoke with their votes in Kansas?

Ducey contends it will supersede the territorial statute. But Sen. Nancy Barto, R-Phoenix, who wrote the new legislation, said it specifically did not repeal the more stringent territorial law.

The governor said he expects the issue will have to be hashed out in court.

https://tucson.com/news/local/abortion-measure-fails-to-make-arizona-ballot/article_d70ded6e-fdf5-11ec-a3ea-0370c5336edc.html

This is beyond the "media bias" you pointed out .. more like media incompetence imo.

But .. sounds like that old absolute ban is on the books until the courts decide and its chilling effect is that abortion providers in AZ have suspended operations.

real world effect and bottom line --- arizona has an absolute ban on abortions

Sunny, AZ is under the old law until final (full??) court decisions on which law should be applicable. I would think (not being a lawyer) that the new law should take precedence. (Matter of fact I think the ruling she made was based on fact the new law had not taken effect when she ruled - now that it has/was supposed to take effect (1 day after her ruling) one would think that is the new law that should be in place. But there is a major difference between the 2 unlike what the local news startion was implying.

https://www.12news.com/article/news/politics/legal-expert-questions-ruling-that-revived-arizonas-158-year-old-abortion-ban/75-8c2eeedf-75f6-49ce-9feb-05a909a31a44

edit I see you already looked it up.

WTF is Wrong with People?

HuffPost
A Sandy Hook Harasser Desecrated A Child's Grave. Another Threatened To Dig It Up.

https://news.yahoo.com/sandy-hook-harasser-desecrated-childs-211757421.html

HuffPost
A Sandy Hook Harasser Desecrated A Child's Grave. Another Threatened To Dig It Up.
Sebastian Murdock
Tue, October 4, 2022 at 5:17 PM
After conspiracy theorist Alex Jones repeatedly lied that one of America’s most deadly school shootings was staged, parents of one victim said they got letters threatening to desecrate their child’s grave.

One person who sent a letter to Mark and Jackie Barden, whose 7-year-old son Daniel was killed in the 2012 Sandy Hook Elementary School shooting, claimed to have urinated on the child’s grave. In another letter, someone threatened to dig up Daniel’s grave to prove he didn’t exist, his parents testified in Jones’ trial on Tuesday.

Daniel did exist. He died along with 19 other children and six adults in the shooting and is now one of the subjects of a defamation trial against Jones, who used his platform Infowars to spread the sick lie that the kids had never died and that their parents were simply actors.