Media Bias


SunnySide
06-29-2021, 11:36 AM
Tucker Carlson: Abolishing the suburbs is major part of Biden administration's infrastructure plan
'This isn’t about racism, stop with that—this is about power.'

The goal is to eliminate suburbs. So rather than improve the lives of people who live in crappy places, the goal is to destroy the lives of people who live in nice places. Why would you want to do that? There’s a very clear political reason. Suburbs are typically purple politically. Republicans win as often as Democrats. If your goal was to make America a one-party state, you’d Republicans can win just as Democrats can but if your goal is to make the country a one-party state, you want to change this. You want to make suburbs into cities and if you did that, you’d win every time.

https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/tucker-carlson-abolishing-suburbs-biden-infrastructure

Low income people are being pushed out of cities they lived generations in because of gentrification and big money builders buying up low income land, tearing it down and building these huge mixed use development condos with Wegmans and Starbucks on the street level and million dollar yuppie condos above.

Low income people were and are forced to the burbs to find affordable housing.

BUT .. Obama and all these democrat cities like Washington DC WANT the low income city residents to not be displaced to the burbs but to stay in the city .. thats why DC gave the Wharf developers incentives in to include affordable housing units.

Cities are TRYING to retain their generational residents ... not have them be displaced by big money developers who look to serve the gentrified starbuck sippers.

Anyone who buys the BS tucker carlson spits out is a fucking idiot.

He just looks to flame the "white rage" flame.

This is noting but pure dog whistle race identity politics ...

Chico23231
06-29-2021, 11:58 AM
Tucker Carlson: Abolishing the suburbs is major part of Biden administration's infrastructure plan
'This isn’t about racism, stop with that—this is about power.'

The goal is to eliminate suburbs. So rather than improve the lives of people who live in crappy places, the goal is to destroy the lives of people who live in nice places. Why would you want to do that? There’s a very clear political reason. Suburbs are typically purple politically. Republicans win as often as Democrats. If your goal was to make America a one-party state, you’d Republicans can win just as Democrats can but if your goal is to make the country a one-party state, you want to change this. You want to make suburbs into cities and if you did that, you’d win every time.

https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/tucker-carlson-abolishing-suburbs-biden-infrastructure

Low income people are being pushed out of cities they lived generations in because of gentrification and big money builders buying up low income land, tearing it down and building these huge mixed use development condos with Wegmans and Starbucks on the street level and million dollar yuppie condos above.

Low income people were and are forced to the burbs to find affordable housing.

BUT .. Obama and all these democrat cities like Washington DC WANT the low income city residents to not be displaced to the burbs but to stay in the city .. thats why DC gave the Wharf developers incentives in to include affordable housing units.

Cities are TRYING to retain their generational residents ... not have them be displaced by big money developers who look to serve the gentrified starbuck sippers.

Anyone who buys the BS tucker carlson spits out is a fucking idiot.

He just looks to flame the "white rage" flame.

This is noting but pure dog whistle race identity politics ...

Setting identity politics aside, should the federal government be able to force zone law changes on municipalities using road/highway construction funds as leverage?

Absolutely not. It’s bad faith, big federal government overreach.

SunnySide
06-29-2021, 01:58 PM
Setting identity politics aside, should the federal government be able to force zone law changes on municipalities using road/highway construction funds as leverage?

Absolutely not. It’s bad faith, big federal government overreach.

What if I told you that this all started bc Westchester applied to federal Community Development Block grants and lied when they said they satisfy the "fair housing" requirement to receive the funds?

And that a lawsuit was brought against Westchester under the false claims act. A lawsuit that Westchester agreed to settle.

but you know ... a predominantly white already well developed neighborhood applying and lying for Federal grants designed to improve worn down neighborhoods doesnt fit the "democrats want to destroy the suburbs to steal votes" rhetoric.

fuck tucker carlson and the idiots who slurp his fluids up

Somehow carlson turns rich people trying to steal money for poor people into ... democrats want drug addicted vagrants on your suburban streets ... democrats bad, republicans will preserve your fragile white lily Andy Griffith life

---------------

https://casetext.com/case/cnty-of-westchester-v-us-dept-of-hous-urban-dev-3

http://www.antibiaslaw.com/westchester-case

https://www.pschousing.org/news/westchester-county-ny-still-fails-comply-court-order

https://www.justice.gov/sites/default/files/crt/legacy/2010/12/15/westchester_pr.pdf

---------

tucker lie #1 :

"the Obama administration withheld more than $20 million in federal funds from Westchester County."

- this is a lie. Obama didnt with hold funds. Instead the govt found out that Westchester had been lying on their grant applications for years collecting over 50 million through the block development program. The govt stopped granting their applications in 2010.

trucker lie #2:

"To its credit, Westchester fought back, because it could afford good lawyers, and eventually won in court."

- this is a lie. They lost very quickly and Westchester promised to cure the fair housing requirement to receive the block development grant money but took them 9 years to actually do it and multiple times Westchester lied from 2010 to 2019 and HUD would check and find out they were lying.
------------------


Why would Tucker Carlson so blatantly lie?

its fucking weird

Chico23231
06-29-2021, 10:40 PM
What if I told you that this all started bc Westchester applied to federal Community Development Block grants and lied when they said they satisfy the "fair housing" requirement to receive the funds?

And that a lawsuit was brought against Westchester under the false claims act. A lawsuit that Westchester agreed to settle.

but you know ... a predominantly white already well developed neighborhood applying and lying for Federal grants designed to improve worn down neighborhoods doesnt fit the "democrats want to destroy the suburbs to steal votes" rhetoric.

fuck tucker carlson and the idiots who slurp his fluids up

Somehow carlson turns rich people trying to steal money for poor people into ... democrats want drug addicted vagrants on your suburban streets ... democrats bad, republicans will preserve your fragile white lily Andy Griffith life

---------------

https://casetext.com/case/cnty-of-westchester-v-us-dept-of-hous-urban-dev-3

http://www.antibiaslaw.com/westchester-case

https://www.pschousing.org/news/westchester-county-ny-still-fails-comply-court-order

https://www.justice.gov/sites/default/files/crt/legacy/2010/12/15/westchester_pr.pdf

---------

tucker lie #1 :

"the Obama administration withheld more than $20 million in federal funds from Westchester County."

- this is a lie. Obama didnt with hold funds. Instead the govt found out that Westchester had been lying on their grant applications for years collecting over 50 million through the block development program. The govt stopped granting their applications in 2010.

trucker lie #2:

"To its credit, Westchester fought back, because it could afford good lawyers, and eventually won in court."

- this is a lie. They lost very quickly and Westchester promised to cure the fair housing requirement to receive the block development grant money but took them 9 years to actually do it and multiple times Westchester lied from 2010 to 2019 and HUD would check and find out they were lying.
------------------


Why would Tucker Carlson so blatantly lie?

its fucking weird

I don’t know the story but if any local government lied to get federal money than that’s wrong under any rule. I really don’t think race had anything to do with it..it’s a liberal county, votes blue. I think it’s more a population density or just a nimby issue.

But I really do think think the federal government doesn’t have any business forcing re zoning laws to build high rise or lots of apartments…It’s more of an eye sore, traffic and population density issues.

Ill never forget I worked with a super liberal who knows Tim Kaine…the amount of hell she raised when an abandon mall project was to install affordable housing near her. All those progressives bitched and complained, finally stopped it. NIMBY always with the libs

Giantone
06-30-2021, 04:45 AM
I don’t know the story but if any local government lied to get federal money than that’s wrong under any rule. I really don’t think race had anything to do with it..it’s a liberal county, votes blue. I think it’s more a population density or just a nimby issue.

But I really do think think the federal government doesn’t have any business forcing re zoning laws to build high rise or lots of apartments…It’s more of an eye sore, traffic and population density issues.

Ill never forget I worked with a super liberal who knows Tim Kaine…the amount of hell she raised when an abandon mall project was to install affordable housing near her. All those progressives bitched and complained, finally stopped it. NIMBY always with the libs

Ahhhhhhh, chico and his hear say friends,..........again .drunk uncle at it again!

Giantone
06-30-2021, 04:48 AM
What if I told you that this all started bc Westchester applied to federal Community Development Block grants and lied when they said they satisfy the "fair housing" requirement to receive the funds?

And that a lawsuit was brought against Westchester under the false claims act. A lawsuit that Westchester agreed to settle.

but you know ... a predominantly white already well developed neighborhood applying and lying for Federal grants designed to improve worn down neighborhoods doesnt fit the "democrats want to destroy the suburbs to steal votes" rhetoric.

fuck tucker carlson and the idiots who slurp his fluids up

Somehow carlson turns rich people trying to steal money for poor people into ... democrats want drug addicted vagrants on your suburban streets ... democrats bad, republicans will preserve your fragile white lily Andy Griffith life

---------------

https://casetext.com/case/cnty-of-westchester-v-us-dept-of-hous-urban-dev-3

http://www.antibiaslaw.com/westchester-case

https://www.pschousing.org/news/westchester-county-ny-still-fails-comply-court-order

https://www.justice.gov/sites/default/files/crt/legacy/2010/12/15/westchester_pr.pdf

---------

tucker lie #1 :

"the Obama administration withheld more than $20 million in federal funds from Westchester County."

- this is a lie. Obama didnt with hold funds. Instead the govt found out that Westchester had been lying on their grant applications for years collecting over 50 million through the block development program. The govt stopped granting their applications in 2010.

trucker lie #2:

"To its credit, Westchester fought back, because it could afford good lawyers, and eventually won in court."

- this is a lie. They lost very quickly and Westchester promised to cure the fair housing requirement to receive the block development grant money but took them 9 years to actually do it and multiple times Westchester lied from 2010 to 2019 and HUD would check and find out they were lying.
------------------


Why would Tucker Carlson so blatantly lie?

its fucking weird

1) It's FOX..............
2) It's Tucker (I sold my soul) Carlson
3) It's FOX

punch it in
06-30-2021, 09:25 AM
I don’t know the story but if any local government lied to get federal money than that’s wrong under any rule. I really don’t think race had anything to do with it..it’s a liberal county, votes blue. I think it’s more a population density or just a nimby issue.

But I really do think think the federal government doesn’t have any business forcing re zoning laws to build high rise or lots of apartments…It’s more of an eye sore, traffic and population density issues.

Ill never forget I worked with a super liberal who knows Tim Kaine…the amount of hell she raised when an abandon mall project was to install affordable housing near her. All those progressives bitched and complained, finally stopped it. NIMBY always with the libs


“I don’t know the story……” but….
Lol

SunnySide
06-30-2021, 09:48 AM
I don’t know the story but if any local government lied to get federal money than that’s wrong under any rule. I really don’t think race had anything to do with it..it’s a liberal county, votes blue. I think it’s more a population density or just a nimby issue.



I never heard of this HUD Community Block Development Grant before Tucker Carlson and i think its a good program (help low to moderate communities develop) but I was amazed at how much Tucker Carlson just out right lied and made stuff up.
-------------------
In early 2009, the Obama administration made a surprising, probably unprecedented accusation against Westchester County, New York—a pretty liberal place. According to the Obama administration, Westchester was an instrument of white supremacy — not the good liberals who live in Westchester, Bill and Hillary Clinton and Alexandria Ocasio Cortez, many others. No one accused them of being bigots. The problem was the buildings they lived in. All those single-family homes — row upon leafy row, set back from the street, well-tended lawns and mailboxes — were examples of racism — literally "structural racism." The only solution, the Obama people announced, was much greater density: more subsidized housing complexes in Westchester, more hi-rise apartment buildings, maybe some drug-addicted vagrants living on the sidewalk, begging for change. Only if Westchester became more like the Bronx could it become non-racist.

https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/tucker-carlson-abolishing-suburbs-biden-infrastructure
-------------------------------

"According to the Obama administration, Westchester was an instrument of white supremacy .."

This is just straight dog whistle word salad to rile up the Tucker Carlson fan base ...

This program was started in the 70s under Ford, not Obama

This program requires 70% of the grant money to be used towards developing low to moderate income housing .. so if your exclusively single family only zoning, you cant use 70% of the grant money to help low to moderate income bc you have no low to moderate income.

Obama wasnt forcing communities to build high rises etc. Westchester was taking money they should have never received by intentionally committing fraud on their grant application forms.

People who watched Carlsons show think Obama is forcing white communities to have "drug addicted vagrants living on their streets" .... when this is not true, not even close to true

im just amazed at the level Carlson will lie and his viewers take it as gospel.

This took 2 minutes of googling to fact check

Stunning example of Tucker Carlson being an absolute untrustworthy source of information .. fake news, misinformation ....

Chico23231
06-30-2021, 10:02 AM
But the question remains, should the federal government force local municipalities to change zoning laws in order to receive funding for roads, bridges, etc?

No, it’s big government over reach and federal government doesn’t know the people, places better than local citizens

The brain worm thought it must be racists to not want high rise built in single family homes neighborhoods is laughable.

I guess the hypocrisy of democrat run city partnering with developers to gentrify parts of the city is just a ok. People should read up on San Francisco, Los Angeles and Brooklyn. There is actual evidence there of pushing out minorities.

SunnySide
06-30-2021, 10:22 AM
But the question remains, should the federal government force local municipalities to change zoning laws in order to receive funding for roads, bridges, etc?

No, it’s big government over reach and federal government doesn’t know the people, places better than local citizens

The brain worm thought it must be racists to not want high rise built in single family homes neighborhoods is laughable.

I guess the hypocrisy of democrat run city partnering with developers to gentrify parts of the city is just a ok. People should read up on San Francisco, Los Angeles and Brooklyn. There is actual evidence there of pushing out minorities.

Huh .. youre just repeating carlsons lie here.

Westchester wasnt forced to do anything. This was a grant for the specific purpose of helping communities maintain and develop low to moderate income housing. If you dont have low to moderate housing .... great but dont apply for grant money and lie on the forms saying you do.

Want to remain as a high income single family community? Great good for you ... but dont apply for low to moderate grant programs and play victim when you get caught.

Chico .. you dont have any kids but on your tax forms you claim a dependent child. IRS finds out a few years later .. I guess you and tucker carlson would start crying saying Obama made you have a baby.

Youre my boy chico but tucker carlson was 100% full of shit on this one to try and twist so much around just so he could say "obama bad" .. democrats want to destroy your white suburbs .. democrats want to steal votes

your better than this ... no one can defend tucker carlson here

EZ Archive Ads Plugin for vBulletin Copyright 2006 Computer Help Forum