How much have we improved player personnel?

He was drafted to be the right tackle. As mentioned earlier Williams, he was the best player in the entire draft (according to 90% of draft pundints)

Why not move Moses to guard? And Scherff to Tackle?
He was a left tackle in college we drafted him 5th overall to play guard? I don't dislike the pick I am not saying it is a bad pick. I am saying we could have traded down(ya ya the phones stopped ringing when the lb was taken) and got scherff in the late 20's possibly in the 2nd round. I am not sure anyone had him as the best left tackle in the draft.

Again I like the player love what the o-line looks like now I could stand to see an upgrade at center.

Imo the tackles are the best players on the other line 1st left 2nd right 3rd Center 4th left guard 5th right guard. We have the #5 overall player in the draft starting at right guard. Does anyone in the league have the 5th overall or better starting at rg? The right tackle that beat him out was drafted in the 3rd round. Scherff started training camp out at RT wasn't doing great they gave Moses a shot and he took full advantage of it.

5th overall pick for a right guard should be perennial pro bowler type player. (Scherff can definitely be that guy.......time will tell)

The player that 90% of pundits, who have never drafted a single player, said we should pick, came in out of shape:

Jets' Leonard Williams says he wasn't in good enough shape to thrive vs. Cleveland Browns | NJ.com (http://www.nj.com/jets/index.ssf/2015/09/jets_leonard_williams_says_he_wasnt_in_good_enough .html)

And his excuse was that coaches really focused on conditioning in college and players have to condition themselves more in the NFL.

HE IS A PROFESSIONAL ATHLETE, WAS DRAFTED 6TH, PAYED MILLIONS, AND CAME IN OUT OF SHAPE.

McLovin probably believes trivial things like work ethic an character are just as important as raw talent. Skinzman is 100% right. The talking heads on television are wrong more than they are right and make these draft rankings like putting together a Madden roster with measurables.

Seriously, when was the last time a guy on ESPN said a player's lazy reputation will hurt their draft stock.

"IMO" stands for "in my opinion" and not "in McLovin's opinion" because he seems to care not for your Scherff is too good to play RG BS.

McLovin drafted him as a good football player. Like he has mentioned in countless interviews, you worry about how to get good players on the field after you have them on the team.

Cravens is a great example and similar to Scherff. Nobody knows if he is a LB or a SS. Nobody cares because he is a good player.

And, player personnel has improved a lot.

... late to the party ...

I do apologize for hijacking the thread. I am new to the site. I did sign up during the draft was recently given permission to post.

Overall....Bro, no apologies necessary, great post. So much to respond to...

Quickly on the Leonard Williams vs Scherff and BPA.

I definitely see where you're coming from. From the positional importance a similarly graded DE trumps a OG. But at the time it was a question of a 'clean' OT(RT) prospect vs a great DE prospect but with medical questions with his shoulder (had post season surgery and didn't bench at combine). That medical question might have (or not who knows?) been the difference in their grade that made Scherff the BPA on their board.

I'm not saying Scherff is a bad pick, I don't think you are either(?). He helped solidify the line and is tough dude that sets a good example. But at the time I would have went Williams and given that Scherff is playing OG I think LW would have been the better pick.

Get to the rest of your (quite comprehensive) post laters...

:food-smil
Good analysis 30gut -- and consistent with what I've read & what Joe Barry was saying. We seemed to do decent on short runs but got gashed for long runs ---> and those long runs are more the LB and safety play on the second level.

Here's a great film breakdown / videos to demonstrate this, ie. comparison between possible run defense w Su'a Cravens vs. Trent Robinson (http://nflbreakdowns.com/sua-cravens-strong-safety-defense/). Thanks, I made an effort to drill down on the run D in another thread (new look defense) and those were my conclusions. For me the state of the run D is a question of how we use the personnel. During rookie mini-camp Cravens started off at ILB but I still believe in base defense he'll play SS and that should boost the run D. IF he plays ILB in base I don't think he'll have the same issues that Compton had with run fits and taking on blockers.

I can't wait to see what Stephen Daniels does in camp. Dude is the definition of a 34 ILB thumper.

Meanwhile, the Eagles' personnel situation continues to amuse: Sproles avoiding OTAs after Eagles fielded trade calls - NFL.com (http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap3000000663136/article/sproles-avoiding-otas-after-eagles-fielded-trade-calls)

I love the fact that they've become the face of dysfunction in our division.

i heard sproles was just out of state with his family and he'd be there for mandatory stuff when it started. so might be nothing.

Overall
My biggest hole is Center I hope Reiter or Long can make a move at Center similar to what Moses did at RT. Maybe even an udfa can upgrade the position.....

......All other spots on the roster I am comfortable with and even if the season started today I would be OK with Lichty at center and hope the d-line can remain healthy.Although the personnel hasn't been upgraded I think the OL will be better. Last year in conjunction with the scheme they were a good pass blocking unit and with continuity I see improvement or at the very least status quo of a solid unit.

For me Lauvao and Licht are candidates for release. I think Long is more then ready to take over at LG or could take over at Center and be imo an upgrade. Although Le Rib isn't a world beater I think he's equal if not better then Kory (especially in the run game). Then there's the Alabama kid who could challenge for Center or challenge for LG if they move Long to center.

Next hole is DT. Maybe ionnodis (spelling) can improve here maybe even Gallete and the Corner play can also buy another half second or full second to get some added pressure.I don't think the DL has improved. But, I don't think they lost a lot. From my research I think the DL was better, especially in the run game then people give them credit for. Baker, was stout when Knighton was out (although I read somewhere that he does not want to play NT [source?]). My boy, Hatcher was basically a pass rusher only while Ricky Jean was solid against the run. I don't think we've lost much in terms of run stopping.

My question is replacing Hatcher's interior pass rush. This could come from several places. The best bet is a healthy Stephen Paea who is historically a good interior rusher. Other options are a return to form Kendell Reyes.

Early on I assumed that Matt Ionniddis would play 5-tech in base and 3-tech in sub/nickel 4-man line. But, I've heard Jay and/or Scott say that he could play NT.

I could actually see Matt have success at NT in this scheme because its not based 2-gap scheme. AND being a rookie that 'I don't want to play NT' factor is not existent. From what I've read his mentality is right for NT and plus he's a rook and will be eager to perform in any role.

Base front could be something like:

RDE-Paea/Ricky NT-Ionniddis/Golston LDE-Baker/Reyes

Although the personnel hasn't been upgraded I think the OL will be better. Last year in conjunction with the scheme they were a good pass blocking unit and with continuity I see improvement or at the very least status quo of a solid unit.

For me Lauvao and Licht are candidates for release. I think Long is more then ready to take over at LG or could take over at Center and be imo an upgrade. Although Le Rib isn't a world beater I think he's equal if not better then Kory (especially in the run game). Then there's the Alabama kid who could challenge for Center or challenge for LG if they move Long to center.

I don't think the DL has improved. But, I don't think they lost a lot. From my research I think the DL was better, especially in the run game then people give them credit for. Baker, was stout when Knighton was out (although I read somewhere that he does not want to play NT [source?]). My boy, Hatcher was basically a pass rusher only while Ricky Jean was solid against the run. I don't think we've lost much in terms of run stopping.

My question is replacing Hatcher's interior pass rush. This could come from several places. The best bet is a healthy Stephen Paea who is historically a good interior rusher. Other options are a return to form Kendell Reyes.

Early on I assumed that Matt Ionniddis would play 5-tech in base and 3-tech in sub/nickel 4-man line. But, I've heard Jay and/or Scott say that he could play NT.

I could actually see Matt have success at NT in this scheme because its not based 2-gap scheme. AND being a rookie that 'I don't want to play NT' factor is not existent. From what I've read his mentality is right for NT and plus he's a rook and will be eager to perform in any role.

Base front could be something like:

RDE-Paea/Ricky NT-Ionniddis/Golston LDE-Baker/Reyes

to the bolded part, I completely disagree . . . IMO, "Le Rib" was a much better pass blocker than Luovo, but Luovo moves much better and was far better in the run game . . . the Skins running game fell apart after he got hurt

...RB- I like Marshall better the Jones. Jones has to hold on to the ball. I like both just love the speed Marshall has.

WR- I think is the strongest deepest position on the team. Last year we skipped a beat with d- Jack out Doctson allows one of the starters to go down and us not skip a beat. I think the tandem moving forward is Doctson and Jackson. My personal favorite of the group is Garcon.

TE- Reed and Davis will be extremely hard to cover at the same time I only think Davis has 1 good year left in him hopefully he has more with being somewhat 2nd string maybe more of a insurance deal if reed can't stay healthy. Be interesting who all makes the team. I look to see Reed Davis Carrier to make the team depending on recovery time. Not a big fan of Niles paul.I think the receiving corps got a huge bump with the addition of Josh Doctson and Vernon Davis.

Doctson was my favorite WR prospect in the entire draft. I think he'll compete/challenge and he'll play. Imo he's good enough to challenge Garcon and Crowder for reps immediately. And my guess will be they will gradually fade the offense away from Garcon and more to Doc.
Net-net. Going from DeSean, Garcon and Crowder to DeSean, Garcon, Crowder and Docston makes a 4 deep WR group that compares well against most teams top 4 wideouts.

Having Reed on the field together with Davis allows the offense to disguise run/pass better then last year and provides 2 TE targets that can attack the seams.

Olb- Between these guys and the corners the are the best this defense has. Can't wait to see Kerrigan and Gallete play opposite each other. Could be 30 sack combo with just them 2. For the past 2 seasons we've been teased with the chance to have 2 very good pass rushing OLB paired with 2 good interior pass rushers. Someone has always managed to get hurt Gallette or Paea. Now we lost an interior rusher in Hatcher. But, I'm thinking on passing downs you kick Preston Smith inside with Paea and have Junior and Ryan bring the heat from the edges. I'm excited to see these dogs hunt this year.

Ilb- this unit is also could use an upgrade Compton and foster did play well down the stretch getting Riley back from an injury may help a little possibly the lb we drafted last year that go injured in training camp will make a move to get in the lineup. Marcus.Imo this unit was a major culprit in the poor run defense. Mason Foster based on his run defense alone seems like he deserves an ILB spot. For me the other ILB spot should be manned by another solid run stopper. Riley or rookie Stephen Daniels (who was tackling machine in college) for me are better fits then Compton in this regard.

DBs- this position could have gone from weakest to strongest in 2015 to 2016....... Safety is also a ? Hall and cravens is who I see starting at safety Ihenacho was playing well before he got hurt will be interesting to see who does start of those 3.I wouldn't count out David Bruton either. Whether its Cravens or Bruton, tackling from the SS improves automatically over Dashon. Hall looks to be making a successful transition from CB to FS. I'm looking forward to the new S tandem. My guess to start the season in base: Hall + Bruton then eventually Hall + Cravens. 'Big nickel' Sub package: Hall + Bruton +Cravens @ nickel S for a LB.

Defense has the potential to be top 10 if they are top 5 I would be extremely suprised.Yards or points or both? I'm bullish on the pass defense but the run game needs fixed.

I don't think there's any question that the Redskins have improved personnel on offense. Let alone having Cousins another year experience in the system. I think the big question mark is on the defense side of the ball. Every year we always hear that they improved the defense and every year they look terrible. I feel like I'm encouraged, but want to see the proof on the field.

I don't think there's any question that the Redskins have improved personnel on offense. Let alone having Cousins another year experience in the system. I think the big question mark is on the defense side of the ball. Every year we always hear that they improved the defense and every year they look terrible. I feel like I'm encouraged, but want to see the proof on the field.

I agree with this. I would guess that we will see only modest improvement -- (1) adding Norman and Breeland with another year of experience ought to make for a much better CB situation, (2) safety is still a work in progress, although Cravens and a healthy Ihenacho are encouraging steps in the right direction, (3) our ILB situation is basically the same (which is not encouraging), unless Spaight can have an impact (please), (4) our OLB situation ought to be better with Gallette in the fold, and (5) the DL has perhaps taken a step back without replacements for Hatcher (who was moderately effective; not sure Murphy is ready to step into those shoes) and Knighton (who was just OK). So better in the CB and OLB positions but likely worse at DL and uncertain as to the other positions. Not expecting big improvement.