skinsfan69
03-01-2016, 11:43 PM
Eagles really had no choice. What was the alternative? Chase Daniel? QB's that are average...Bradford, Alex Smith, Tannehill and Dalton are all making big money. It's just the way the league is trending. You have to overpay if you have a average starter.
Daseal
03-01-2016, 11:58 PM
John Elway said it best. There's no middle class for the QB. You're likely either going to overpay or have a journeyman. (last sentence was mine).
I think the franchise tag is the right call. If Cousins does it 2 years in a row, something the Redskins havent done for a long time, then let's wrap him up for quite a few years.
Hijinx
03-02-2016, 12:03 AM
Quarterbacks almost never get non-exclusive.* I know it is rare for teams to be willing to pay two 1st rounders , but quarterbacks is a different thing. Is it so unlikely that the Texans(22nd pick) or the Broncos(32nd pick) would give a late 1st this year and next to solve their QB problems?
The Skins paid more than that to move up and get RG3. Is there that much Cap savings in the non exclusive tag?
*Edit- Once in the last decade and that was Matt Cassel whom the Pats didn't even want to keep just used him as trade bait.
FRPLG
03-02-2016, 12:37 AM
You either have a QB that can play well enough for you to win or you're picking in the top ten. That's the name of the game in the NFL now. There's no in between. As others have said if not Cousins, then who? It's an odd phenomenon in the NFL...there's really no such thing as average. You're QB can play and you pay him 15-20 a year or he sucks.
CRedskinsRule
03-02-2016, 02:42 AM
Quarterbacks almost never get non-exclusive.* I know it is rare for teams to be willing to pay two 1st rounders , but quarterbacks is a different thing. Is it so unlikely that the Texans(22nd pick) or the Broncos(32nd pick) would give a late 1st this year and next to solve their QB problems?
The Skins paid more than that to move up and get RG3. Is there that much Cap savings in the non exclusive tag?
*Edit- Once in the last decade and that was Matt Cassel whom the Pats didn't even want to keep just used him as trade bait.
I believe the difference is $5-6 Million, it also changes the bar that the long term deal negotiations start from.
That Guy
03-02-2016, 03:09 AM
I believe the difference is $5-6 Million, it also changes the bar that the long term deal negotiations start from.
no, non exclusive or exclusive, the franchise tag is 19.9m, the transition tag (where he can walk and you get nothing if you don't match another team's deal) is 17.something.
CRedskinsRule
03-02-2016, 03:12 AM
no, non exclusive or exclusive, the franchise tag is 19.9m, the transition tag (where he can walk and you get nothing if you don't match another team's deal) is 17.something.
My understanding is that the exclusive tag would be plus or minus 25.5M, or about 5-6M more. That's what espn980 was saying on the afternoon radio.
Sent from my S6 Edge
Word is KC will sign the deal pretty quickly, and why the hell wouldn't he?
over the mountain
03-02-2016, 09:50 AM
Im a big KC fan but I do have questions of whether:
1. he can execute against top 10 defenses
2. he can execute wout Jordan Reed
If he wants more than 18 mil per, let him play under the tag and prove he is worth the money. Then, in 2017, paying him 25m under the tag isnt too horrible.
That Guy
03-02-2016, 10:21 AM
My understanding is that the exclusive tag would be plus or minus 25.5M, or about 5-6M more. That's what espn980 was saying on the afternoon radio.
Sent from my S6 Edge
dunno what they were talking about, but exclusive or non exclusive franchise tags are both 19.9m for QBs this year from everything i've seen. next year the price goes up a minimum of 20%, which would be 24m, which is also less than whatever they were discussing.