Cousins has arrived

Pages : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 [35] 36 37 38 39 40

Hog1
01-12-2016, 09:35 PM
I think McCoy comes back and someone is drafted.

Hope he does! like that kid........

MTK
01-12-2016, 10:44 PM
If you draft a QB, OR pick up an undrafted QB, could that potentially play towards a quarterback controversy if Kirk has rough spots next year? Or do you think they stick with Kirk next year no matter what? What i want to see is the team have patience with KC. I know Jay Gruden will to a point, but i still worry about un-needed extra crap on the team. I think it should be KC, then McCoy as backup, then if they absolutely must have a 3rd string guy, bring in an old veteran guy like Matt Hasselbeck or someone like that who can still go for a game or two if absolutely needed


If you give KC big money, he's not going to be looking over his shoulder with a late round or undrafted QB. They stuck by him all this year, why would that change?

Come on now.

And if you have McCoy, you don't need Hasslebeck.

punch it in
01-12-2016, 10:45 PM
If McCoy comes back, he IS the journeyman vet depth.



I am fine with also drafting a QB with promise, to develop him.


Yeah I meant...another

punch it in
01-12-2016, 10:46 PM
If you draft a QB, OR pick up an undrafted QB, could that potentially play towards a quarterback controversy if Kirk has rough spots next year? Or do you think they stick with Kirk next year no matter what? What i want to see is the team have patience with KC. I know Jay Gruden will to a point, but i still worry about un-needed extra crap on the team. I think it should be KC, then McCoy as backup, then if they absolutely must have a 3rd string guy, bring in an old veteran guy like Matt Hasselbeck or someone like that who can still go for a game or two if absolutely needed


Exactly....

CRedskinsRule
01-12-2016, 10:49 PM
If you draft a QB, OR pick up an undrafted QB, could that potentially play towards a quarterback controversy if Kirk has rough spots next year? Or do you think they stick with Kirk next year no matter what? What i want to see is the team have patience with KC. I know Jay Gruden will to a point, but i still worry about un-needed extra crap on the team. I think it should be KC, then McCoy as backup, then if they absolutely must have a 3rd string guy, bring in an old veteran guy like Matt Hasselbeck or someone like that who can still go for a game or two if absolutely needed
If they pay the expected contract KC will be the undisputed starter for the next 4 years

Sent from my S6 Edge

punch it in
01-12-2016, 10:52 PM
If you give KC big money, he's not going to be looking over his shoulder with a late round or undrafted QB. They stuck by him all this year, why would that change?

Come on now.

And if you have McCoy, you don't need Hasslebeck.


Something like the Eagles with three vets, except ours are better. Alot of teams have three vets with one being the younger one on the rise.

MTK
01-12-2016, 10:53 PM
Seems like a waste to me, usual setup is a 3rd stringer is inactive. You don't need a vet for that.

punch it in
01-12-2016, 11:06 PM
Seems like a waste to me, usual setup is a 3rd stringer is inactive. You don't need a vet for that.


100% imo whoever the rogue third string body is he would be inactive. I mean u cannot gameplan on losing two qb's in the same game. I just think the bigger waste would be a pick when we need to win now and win thru the draft. I think i just have so much faith in SM that I think he can pluck 7 contributors out of one draft. Lol. Hey like i said if there is some qb sitting there at any spot and it is absolutely shocking he is still there than snatch him up. Im with Snake though I dont want to mess with KC's psyche even though I think it is strong. He just went thru so much with Griff n the pressure of proving himself to the organization. Whatever happens I got faith in this FO and staff though.

MTK
01-12-2016, 11:09 PM
I wouldn't draft one either. UDFA all the way.

NC_Skins
01-12-2016, 11:23 PM
If you don't pay Kirk a 4yr/85-90mil contract .


Correction on this. I meant to put 5yr/85-90mil. Kirk definitely isn't in a position yet to demand 20+mil a year. I think the contract hits about 17-18mil/yr with us being able to get out after that second year. (if it's structured properly)

EZ Archive Ads Plugin for vBulletin Copyright 2006 Computer Help Forum